Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But it would increase the options and variety of attack assets, taking advantage of its mountainous geography to hide the IRBM force.Which would mean a higher cost... for deployment of 3000km+ range IRBMs that can be fired from silos or TELs near the Afghan or Pak borders....

There have been many eyewitnesses claiming drones came from Azerbaijan. It shouldn’t be ignoredOil is already known fact, but involvement in direct destructive operation against Iran, if it's true, must be adequate addressed by Iran...they went too far...
Is this so-called ceasefire just a rush to see who re-arms first? Israel to replenish air defense and missiles, or Iran to build the bomb?
Neither China nor Russia is thinking about anything other than appeasing the United States; they will never sell useful weapons to Iran.
North Korea was in the same position. However, without making excuses, they have developed everything themselves, from nuclear weapons to giant drones and large submarines. At the same time, they have placed all their bases underground. Despite being a poor, small country with no resources and a population of only 20 million.
Iran lacks only the resolve of its leaders.
That is the root cause of all its weakness.
Israel just proved otherwise.Obviously, Hamas, Hezbollah, prayer to Allah (!), faith and firing 10-30 missiles per day while the enemy is targeting your launchers are the ultimate deterrence according to the Grand Ayatollah.
Nukes and jet fighters are useless. And the US has lost every war they have fought since WWII!
Do you use Chinese equipment? Which ones? As far as I know, only MANPADS.What could we do last month when subjected to a similar attack from India? And desperately tried retaliation with Chinese weaponry?
How did that go for us?
Have you checked the Persian Gulf missile? It was Iran's first ASBM.This missile may have the capacity to hit mobile targets, which could be part of Iran's anti-ship ASBM, but Iran needs to increase its ISTAR capacity to designate targets in real time, which is an asymmetry in the face of American naval power.
If it is an anti-ship IRBM, it would be even better for Iran, as it would provide an anti-access and maritime denial area at greater ranges and prevent US Navy aggression.
No, you are wrong! The Grand Ayatollah has finally sent us a video message from some bunker where he claims that the Zionist regime was crushed, thanks to God.Israel just proved otherwise.
Yes, but its range is 300 km. Iran needs to extend its anti-access range to the range of its MRBM missiles and then move on to IRBMs, which would be the only asymmetric strategy capable of countering a US Navy threat, but even then it would depend on a broad and comprehensive ISTAR capability to designate targets.Have you checked the Persian Gulf missile? It was Iran's first ASBM.
![]()
Persian Gulf (missile) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Obviously, Hamas, Hezbollah, prayer to Allah (!), faith and firing 10-30 missiles per day while the enemy is targeting your launchers are the ultimate deterrence according to the Grand Ayatollah.
Nukes and jet fighters are useless. And the US has lost every war they have fought since WWII!
Iran doesn’t want anything from neither of the two no? Evidently…….or it would have bought it no?Neither China nor Russia is thinking about anything other than appeasing the United States; they will never sell useful weapons to Iran.
North Korea was in the same position. However, without making excuses, they have developed everything themselves, from nuclear weapons to giant drones and large submarines. At the same time, they have placed all their bases underground. Despite being a poor, small country with no resources and a population of only 20 million.
Iran lacks only the resolve of its leaders.
That is the root cause of all its weakness.
Iran's deterrence was lost in 2020 when Trump assassinated Gen. Soleimani and all we did was a symbolic, coordinated response.Well, the proxies and the threat of the Iranian missiles were proven deterrence for decades.
I believe Iran has prevailed in the recent conflict but Iran wouldn't have suffered so many losses and humiliation had the proxies existed as potently AND the spies/saboteurs not wrecked Iran from within.
I don't think you understood his sarcasmIsrael just proved otherwise.