US1956
Registered Member
In 2008, president Bush invited President Hu JinTao to join the US to create a 2G, but president HU JINTAO turned down the offer. In 2008, China was quite weak compare to now. What kind of benefits can Chinese get?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People like Trump uphold the typical rules of the jungle, and he's always thinking that a few big guys should work together to bully other little guys. But Chinese culture is not like that, and we know very well that Trump's approach is extremely short-sighted, and will only lead to the corruption and degeneration of the big guys, eventually dragging the entire human civilization down with him. What you say about having China replace the US is also impossible, we can't afford to pay the price of maintaining the entire world order. If we force this, we will inevitably get the same end as the US. A multi-polar world is the only correct answer, and only a multi-polar world will allow human civilization to continue to grow and develop.
People like Trump uphold the typical rules of the jungle, and he's always thinking that a few big guys should work together to bully other little guys. But Chinese culture is not like that, and we know very well that Trump's approach is extremely short-sighted, and will only lead to the corruption and degeneration of the big guys, eventually dragging the entire human civilization down with him. What you say about having China replace the US is also impossible, we can't afford to pay the price of maintaining the entire world order. If we force this, we will inevitably get the same end as the US. A multi-polar world is the only correct answer, and only a multi-polar world will allow human civilization to continue to grow and develop.
otonet.fun
LOL..China is living in a world shaped by its own ambitions and worldview.SCO and BRIC, everything india touches turn into shit and become worthless.
India was only invited because of russia, so if Russia insist they need this shit we will start a new alliance group without russia as well.
In a Vietnamese forum recently, there is an article about Chinese art of war (written by America-China watcher) which talks about how superior the Chinese army is compared to the US army now (electric welfare, satellite, radar etc.), i.e. Chinese can basically crush the US army whenever it wants.
But the probkem is that, China does not want to handle the mess because of the vacuum left after the collapse of the US, so it must keep the US functioning as long as possible.
Trang 24 | Theo dõi diễn biến nóng khu vực Châu Á: sự đối đầ...
Trang 24 | Chúc mừng năm mới và vol mới, em đang post thì thấy vol cũ khóa, mạn phép các cụ mở vol mới để tiếp tục chém gió Link nhà cũ đây ạ ...otonet.fun
It expresses people' opinion in a civilized way. Most members of this forum are highly educated..That forum is basically an anti-US, pro-China/Russia echo chamber that glorifies the kind of state-run capitalism disguised as communism. Forums like that are designed to attract very specific type of users who have buried themselves in rigid ideological bubbles and shaped their entire worldview around those biases. It's anything but neutral, and definitely not the kind of space you would turn to for objective analysis.
this forum has very diverse viewpoints, sometimes shockingly so. With regards to objective analysis, I doubt you can find a spot on the internet for that. Objective analysis in media has already proven a myth.That forum is basically an anti-US, pro-China/Russia echo chamber that glorifies the kind of state-run capitalism disguised as communism. Forums like that are designed to attract very specific type of users who have buried themselves in rigid ideological bubbles and shaped their entire worldview around those biases. It's anything but neutral, and definitely not the kind of space you would turn to for objective analysis.
That forum is basically an anti-US, pro-China/Russia echo chamber that glorifies the kind of state-run capitalism disguised as communism. Forums like that are designed to attract very specific type of users who have buried themselves in rigid ideological bubbles and shaped their entire worldview around those biases. It's anything but neutral, and definitely not the kind of space you would turn to for objective analysis.
It expresses people' opinion in a civilized way. Most members of this forum are highly educated..
You might not, but I believe I have every right to question an echo chamber like that, both literally and figuratively. I remember you once said voz is uneducated. Maybe that's true if you are strict about what counts as civilized discourse. But these days, even the pro-US members there openly criticize and defame Trump and MAGA day and night. That's the difference. And in the international forums I have been reading for a few years now, like Singapore's HardwareZone and Malaysia's Lowyat, there's plenty of open debate as well.And where do you can find anything truly neutral on earth, except in natural sciences.
They were deliberate about which sources they translated, choosing only those that aligned with their agenda. And yes, even the highly educated aren't immune to this.Anyway, what was posted and discussed seems to be translated from a foreign source.
I didn't say anything about PDF. That's why I'm still active here.this forum has very diverse viewpoints, sometimes shockingly so. With regards to objective analysis, I doubt you can find a spot on the internet for that. Objective analysis in media has already proven a myth.
Yes, but that doesn't make that forum isn't an echo chamber.Position is like motion, it is relative.
Most people take their own position as the middle ground and then go on to position others.
Well done China......
China is in different league. It should not be grouped with India, Brazil and Russia, unless a group of alliance (then India is at odd). China is even in different league to the US.
Does this mean no more BRICS currency? I always thought that was a dumb idea. What's wrong with just trading in RMB among the BRICS members?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.