Chinese Economy: General News, Updates and Discussions

In 2008, president Bush invited President Hu JinTao to join the US to create a 2G, but president HU JINTAO turned down the offer. In 2008, China was quite weak compare to now. What kind of benefits can Chinese get?
 
People like Trump uphold the typical rules of the jungle, and he's always thinking that a few big guys should work together to bully other little guys. But Chinese culture is not like that, and we know very well that Trump's approach is extremely short-sighted, and will only lead to the corruption and degeneration of the big guys, eventually dragging the entire human civilization down with him. What you say about having China replace the US is also impossible, we can't afford to pay the price of maintaining the entire world order. If we force this, we will inevitably get the same end as the US. A multi-polar world is the only correct answer, and only a multi-polar world will allow human civilization to continue to grow and develop.

You will be considered as very naive even in 1970s.
 
People like Trump uphold the typical rules of the jungle, and he's always thinking that a few big guys should work together to bully other little guys. But Chinese culture is not like that, and we know very well that Trump's approach is extremely short-sighted, and will only lead to the corruption and degeneration of the big guys, eventually dragging the entire human civilization down with him. What you say about having China replace the US is also impossible, we can't afford to pay the price of maintaining the entire world order. If we force this, we will inevitably get the same end as the US. A multi-polar world is the only correct answer, and only a multi-polar world will allow human civilization to continue to grow and develop.

In a Vietnamese forum recently, there is an article about Chinese art of war (written by America-China watcher) which talks about how superior the Chinese army is compared to the US army now (electric welfare, satellite, radar etc.), i.e. Chinese can basically crush the US army whenever it wants.

But the probkem is that, China does not want to handle the mess because of the vacuum left after the collapse of the US, so it must keep the US functioning as long as possible.

 
SCO and BRIC, everything india touches turn into shit and become worthless.

India was only invited because of russia, so if Russia insist they need this shit we will start a new alliance group without russia as well.
LOL..China is living in a world shaped by its own ambitions and worldview.

It seeks global status on its own terms, while Russia is determined not to lose the influence it already has.

On the other hand, countries like India, Brazil, and South Africa are trying to maintain a balanced relationship with both sides.

So, blaming India alone doesn't make sense. All five BRICS nations have their own unique national interests, and they're not always aligned.

Expecting this group to suddenly become a powerful and unified force is unrealistic.

We’ve seen many other international alliances—formed on the basis of religion or regional proximity—fail to achieve lasting success, precisely because they couldn’t align their interests or priorities.
 
In a Vietnamese forum recently, there is an article about Chinese art of war (written by America-China watcher) which talks about how superior the Chinese army is compared to the US army now (electric welfare, satellite, radar etc.), i.e. Chinese can basically crush the US army whenever it wants.

But the probkem is that, China does not want to handle the mess because of the vacuum left after the collapse of the US, so it must keep the US functioning as long as possible.


That forum is basically an anti-US, pro-China/Russia echo chamber that glorifies the kind of state-run capitalism disguised as communism. Forums like that are designed to attract very specific type of users who have buried themselves in rigid ideological bubbles and shaped their entire worldview around those biases. It's anything but neutral, and definitely not the kind of space you would turn to for objective analysis.
 
That forum is basically an anti-US, pro-China/Russia echo chamber that glorifies the kind of state-run capitalism disguised as communism. Forums like that are designed to attract very specific type of users who have buried themselves in rigid ideological bubbles and shaped their entire worldview around those biases. It's anything but neutral, and definitely not the kind of space you would turn to for objective analysis.
It expresses people' opinion in a civilized way. Most members of this forum are highly educated..

And where do you can find anything truly neutral on earth, except in natural sciences.

Anyway, what was posted and discussed seems to be translated from a foreign source.
 
That forum is basically an anti-US, pro-China/Russia echo chamber that glorifies the kind of state-run capitalism disguised as communism. Forums like that are designed to attract very specific type of users who have buried themselves in rigid ideological bubbles and shaped their entire worldview around those biases. It's anything but neutral, and definitely not the kind of space you would turn to for objective analysis.
this forum has very diverse viewpoints, sometimes shockingly so. With regards to objective analysis, I doubt you can find a spot on the internet for that. Objective analysis in media has already proven a myth.
 
That forum is basically an anti-US, pro-China/Russia echo chamber that glorifies the kind of state-run capitalism disguised as communism. Forums like that are designed to attract very specific type of users who have buried themselves in rigid ideological bubbles and shaped their entire worldview around those biases. It's anything but neutral, and definitely not the kind of space you would turn to for objective analysis.

Position is like motion, it is relative.

Most people take their own position as the middle ground and then go on to position others.
 
It expresses people' opinion in a civilized way. Most members of this forum are highly educated..
image.png

image.png

They are civilized because most of the members share the same worldview and are shaped by the same political influences. Unlike PDF, which is international, that one is mostly just Vietnamese members, and there are what, like a thousand people tops? This is not even an ordinary Vietnamese forum.

And being highly educated or politically aware doesn't make you immune to bias. You can still lean toward a particular point of view.
image.png

And where do you can find anything truly neutral on earth, except in natural sciences.
You might not, but I believe I have every right to question an echo chamber like that, both literally and figuratively. I remember you once said voz is uneducated. Maybe that's true if you are strict about what counts as civilized discourse. But these days, even the pro-US members there openly criticize and defame Trump and MAGA day and night. That's the difference. And in the international forums I have been reading for a few years now, like Singapore's HardwareZone and Malaysia's Lowyat, there's plenty of open debate as well.
Anyway, what was posted and discussed seems to be translated from a foreign source.
They were deliberate about which sources they translated, choosing only those that aligned with their agenda. And yes, even the highly educated aren't immune to this.
 
this forum has very diverse viewpoints, sometimes shockingly so. With regards to objective analysis, I doubt you can find a spot on the internet for that. Objective analysis in media has already proven a myth.
I didn't say anything about PDF. That's why I'm still active here.
Position is like motion, it is relative.

Most people take their own position as the middle ground and then go on to position others.
Yes, but that doesn't make that forum isn't an echo chamber.
//
Anyway, it's off-topic.
 
Well done China......

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Well done China......

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Interesting to see Pakistan is dropping given the scheme by Imran to plant so many trees?
 
China is in different league. It should not be grouped with India, Brazil and Russia, unless a group of alliance (then India is at odd). China is even in different league to the US.

That's exactly the reason why China has dumped BRICS and created G2 with the US.

US and China are the only great powers of the world.
 
Does this mean no more BRICS currency? I always thought that was a dumb idea. What's wrong with just trading in RMB among the BRICS members?
 
Does this mean no more BRICS currency? I always thought that was a dumb idea. What's wrong with just trading in RMB among the BRICS members?

RMB is already pegged to USD.

Any country who does not have USD could trade in RMB.

Creating a new currency is dumb.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top