China preparing for 'protracted' war, says think tank

Beijingwalker

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
92,062
Reaction score
112,971
Reputation
2,148.0
Country of Origin
Country of Residence

China preparing for 'protracted' war, says think tank

IISS warns of era of insecurity, with Beijing learning from Ukraine war
https%3A%2F%2Fcms-image-bucket-production-ap-northeast-1-a7d2.s3.ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%2Fimages%2F0%2F9%2F3%2F4%2F47274390-3-eng-GB%2FCropped-17078258302022-11-09T092833Z_1826950939_RC25IX9ELKOU_RTRMADP_3_CHINA-AIRSHOW.JPG

A J-20 stealth fighter jet of the Chinese People's Liberation Army. China's development of high-speed weaponry such as hypersonic glide vehicles is driving global military designs. (China Daily via Reuters) © Reuters

RHYANNON BARTLETT-IMADEGAWA, Nikkei staff writer
February 14, 2024 00:45 JST

LONDON -- China is learning from Russia's invasion of Ukraine and starting to prepare for a "protracted" war in the Indo-Pacific region by making legal changes that will help integrate military and civilian mobilization, an analyst at the International Institute for Strategic Studies said on Tuesday.

Recent moves by China to ease any return of reservists and veterans to their former units as well as give the military access to civilian infrastructure and fuel stocks show Beijing's thinking about how to fight a conflict in the Indo-Pacific, said Meia Nouwens, senior fellow for Chinese security and defense policy at the IISS.

These changes suggest Beijing thinks an Indo-Pacific conflict might not be "a short, quick, swift victory after a surprise attack, but actually acknowledging that potential conflict might be protracted, and a war of attrition," she told Nikkei Asia at the launch of the IISS Military Balance 2024, an annual report.

Beijing is studying Russia's moves to cope with the war in Ukraine, she said. Moscow had thought it would conquer Ukraine in days, but fighting continues nearly two years later.

With the Hamas-Israel war in Gaza threatening to become a wider conflict, as well as coups in Niger and Gabon, Azerbaijan retaking the Nagorno-Karabakh region and China's belligerence over Taiwan and the South China Sea, the London-based think tank warned of an "era of insecurity" in its Military Balance.

The report expects global defense spending this year to surpass the record $2.2 trillion for 2023, itself a 9% increase over the year before.

Chinese defense spending increased 5.4% in local currency terms to 1.55 trillion yuan in 2023 ($219.5 billion), according to figures from the Military Balance, for a 29th consecutive year of growth. This is equivalent to $407.9 billion, taking into account purchasing power parity.

Beijing's assertive actions are prompting substantial defense budget increases in East Asia. Taiwan's spending rose 24.2% in 2023, while Japan began its planned multiyear growth with a 10.5% increase in 2023.

The report noted "the current military-security situation heralds what is likely to be a more dangerous decade." Robert Wall, editor of the report, said it is no longer Russia but China that is "driving the designs" of modernizing capabilities.

Though Moscow "talks a lot," it does not have much to show on the field, Wall said. In contrast, "the Chinese are developing new weapons, they're advanced weapons, they're increasingly interesting in design approach, and they're actually starting to get them out there," he said, referring particularly to high-speed weaponry such as hypersonic glide vehicles.

"Washington is not obsessing about what Moscow is doing in terms of weapons capability. It is very much focused on what Beijing is doing," Wall said.

The report also found that Russia now spends more than 30% of its national budget on the military. Since beginning its full-scale invasion of Ukraine two years ago, Russia has lost around 3,000 of its main battle tanks, roughly what it held in active inventory.

But the IISS estimated that given the scale of its stored equipment, "Moscow could potentially sustain around three more years of heavy losses and replenish tanks from stocks, even if at lower technical standard, irrespective of its ability to produce new equipment."
 
Good luck with that, especially against someone like Taiwan.

Taiwan is a lot more prepared than Ukraine ever was. Not to mention that there's a whole body of water between China and Taiwan which'll make things a lot more difficult.

Then there's the issue of S. Korea, Japan and US, especially the US, jumping in as soon as the conflict starts.

Can China fight multiple opponents at once??

Maybe Australia and India will jump in too at some point. That'll just mean more trouble for China.
 
Good luck with that, especially against someone like Taiwan.

Taiwan is a lot more prepared than Ukraine ever was. Not to mention that there's a whole body of water between China and Taiwan which'll make things a lot more difficult.

Then there's the issue of S. Korea, Japan and US, especially the US, jumping in as soon as the conflict starts.

Can China fight multiple opponents at once??

Maybe Australia and India will jump in too at some point. That'll just mean more trouble for China.
ROC used to have the whole of China, but still got defeated by PRC.
 
ROC used to have the whole of China, but still got defeated by PRC.

That's because ROC was weakened from fighting the Japanese during WW2.

Not to mention that the support given to ROC by US was outmatched by the support given to PRC by the Soviets.

You also forgot that there was a Kuomintang Islamic insurgency against the PRC in Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, Xinjiang, and Yunnan until 1958.
 
That's because ROC was weakened from fighting the Japanese during WW2.
ROC was never strong before or after WW2, it never managed to really bring the whole nation under one centralised rule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dbc
Then there's the issue of S. Korea, Japan and US, especially the US, jumping in as soon as the conflict starts.

Can China fight multiple opponents at once??

Maybe Australia and India will jump in too at some point. That'll just mean more trouble for China.
LOl, they can start by recognizing ROC first, non of them dare so far.
 
ROC was never strong before or after WW2, it never managed to really bring the whole nation under one centralised rule.

You sure?

The Northern Expedition made ROC control all of China until the Civil War started.

1707906851223.png
 
You sure?

The Northern Expedition made ROC control all of China until the Civil War started.

View attachment 18877
I m pretty sure, KMT never fully controlled provincial warlords. In China, everyone knows that, ask any Chinese you know, they also surely know that.

ROC in 1934
an_alternate_warlord_era_of_china_by_adozeneggs_ddsdg5z-pre-jpg.2230
 
In fact, after defeating the KMT, the CCP had enough time to resolve domestic problems because at that time Japan was defeated and the Soviet Union was their supporting ally.
PRC fought US in Korea just months after it was founded.
 
And the United States is a few thousand kilometers away from China, but the Soviet Union is right next door. The United States suffered enormous logistical pressure, but the Soviet Union and the CCP did not.

If the Soviet Union was not China's neighbor, the KMT had enough capacity to destroy the CCP then deal with the remaining local warlords.
Actually Japan was totally under US control and supplied US troops way more sufficiently than Russia to the Chinese communists, Russia's industrial bases were all in Europe and its far east was just some wastelands.
 
It won't take more than a week.
 
China should prepare for a prolonged war as a lesson from Ukraine. Thinking your opponent will simply lay down is dangerously naive.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top