BigMela2onin
Registered Member
The only good aspect of the ceasefire was that it stopped the killing of civilians. Otherwise, the enemy can resupply way faster than Iran can and is only using the ceasefire to rearm interceptors before they relaunch the war, they have openly said so.I don’t understand your stance, are you for or against ceasefire? Did you want us to be more aggressive or was it good that we held back?
Iran has been way too reluctant towards conflict and that has brought the war slowly to our own door. I don't think I've ever advocated for restraint. If we had hit back harder after Soleimani, the Damascus embassy attack, the first jew attack on Iran, things would likely be different now.
What good have the reformists done for Iran? Are sanctions gone? Do we still have the JCPOA? You did manage to unfilter WhatsApp which the jews used to target scientists, congratulations. Even now they advocated for diplomacy when the enemy said they used diplomacy as a ruse and are not interested in making a deal. They will demand our missiles so they can bomb and kill us like they do in Syria and Lebanon, and reformists would give those up if they could. But they don't deserve all the blame, Khamenei is also a gullible, naive idiot who led us to become a highly sanctioned nation without nuclear weapons and without allies.Proof , zero
By the way according to mr. Hajizadeh it was at the time of your precious ahmadinejad in 1388 that irgc had sell lands to get the money they needed to research develope drone and missile not reformist and at the time of Mr. Rouhani (you may consider him reformist but he actually was a moderate) he increased the budget of irgc each year so not only the never had to resort to such measures for research and development but the had enough to spend 50miliard on resistance axis .
But who cares enemies and foreigners said blame reformist so let blame reformist for such things
Last edited:








