That may well be the case, but then there goes your entire doctrine of keeping under the "threshold". As I've already described, your policy of "punishing Pakistan" for your own security failures is idiotic and doomed to fail. After every attack in Kashmir you've escalated, the attacks will not stop in Kashmir and your attacks will not deter Pakistan from supporting the Kashmiri Freedom fighters. You'll have to escalate after each attack until you will be forced to breach that threshold. The only end game in sight is a full blown war, in which case it's anyone's guess what will happen.
That was the gist of most discussions on the previous iteration of this forum. If you disagree then, you are most welcome because it would turn into my word against your’s.
The issue with Parveen, is that he has to find faults with each and everything done by the government. Had they done what he is demanding, then he is likely to have criticised that too. That’s why no one listens to him anymore. He could be right or wrong, but I find him a nuisance because of this trait of his. Parveen has to display better line of thinking rather than one of always saying 180 deg opposite of what Indian government does or says. There are adequate number of professionals this side, who can analyse things pragmatically. Parveen is not the last word on these matters.
You cant attack a sovreign nation and 3 months later still provide not 1 ounce of proof of proof the reason why. You cant kill children of the Pakistan soil and not expect a befitting response. You then get a bloody nose and ask the USA for a cease fire.
What is that “threshold”? When Kargil happened it was supposed to be Indian fighters crossing that side. That’s why Indian fighters were asked to remain our side due to that “threshold”.
That "threshold" is the nuclear threshold that you indians keep barking on about, jumping up and down that you've responded to Pakistan's crying wolf all the time. The fact that you've been forced to escalate each and every time, and yet Pakistan continues to support the Kashmir freedom fighters means you can't deter Pakistan, and the attacks will continue, eventually leading to a full scale war. But that's ok, because you indians believe tantric technology will help you survive a nuclear exchange.
It's not a threshold. It's simply a continuation of your religious pogroms extended access the border to neighboring regions. Seen this before. It's an ancient religious war unlike anything anywhere in the world in recent history. The two day three day conflicts will continue sporadically until the escalation results in the big war.
I am not taking any sides on this.
So we can very well assume a larger false flag by India.. resulting in attack on Pakistan?
Fact that your argument relies on “barking”, “jumping up and down”, “crying wolf” and “Tantric technology” shows that you could be frothing from your mouth while typing your argument.
Well, equally, the fact that you've had to rely on ad homin attacks about conspiracy theories and whatnot would equally suggest you have little to argue about. On the one hand you state all of this is leading to a full scale war, and yet somehow claim that can be achieved without triggering the nuclear threshold between two nuclear armed neighbours, which would certainly be a first in history. There goes your entire doctrine of staying below the nuclear threshold then.
I have no say on the nuclear threshold. It’s just an assumption based on the recent conflicts.
