Khorasan Black Flags
Trusted Member
- Thread starter
- #51,541
Not sure how many rats have been perished 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nobody clamed a 99% interception rate. That's a strawman fallacy.Mirandi shares two videos. One clearly shows a missile strike in broad daylight with 100% accuracy — that’s the footage I was referring to. The video also highlights the repeated falsehoods about a so-called 99% interception rate. I'm not sure why he included the footage from Ukraine.
What it has achieved is yet to be determined, but the evidence suggests that they set back Iran's nuclear program by years. As far as the civilian nuclear program on the ground is concerned, it has been obliterated.There's no question that the U.S. inflicted damage — that’s not in dispute. The real question is: what did it achieve? Meanwhile, Israel is concealing the extent of the damage it sustained. All available evidence points to Iran's strikes causing a significant impact.
1) Not anymore. The IAEA experts are returning to Iran and the regime is in talks with the Europeans now. First session to be held tomorrow at the Iranian consulate in Istanbul.Here are the facts:
1) Now there is ambiguity regarding the nuclear program. Even the foreign minister is unaware.
2) The knowledge is there, and it can not be bombed.
3) The US/Israel do not know where the 60% uranium is, and if any of it was destroyed.
4) The sites that were bombed were research centers for the most part. In addition, they contained old-generation centrifuges. When you deal with a narcissist who commands the world's most powerful military, you tell him what he wants to hear. Yes, great president, everything was destroyed with your super duper strikes.
5) Iran proved it has a deterrence capability. Iran can strike back.
6) Iran has the industrial base to build as many centrifuges as it needs.
It is a result of mismanagement. Iran's precipitation average is still twice that of Egypt, yet Cairo doesn't have water and power cuts like we do now. Iran's water crisis is a result of decades of mismanagement and wrong policies in agriculture and population planning.Is the water crisis a result of the regime's mismanagement, or is it due to climate change? It is mainly the climate. https://apnews.com/article/climate-change-drought-syria-iraq-iran-bd1c8458da5fbd2be766b25ecd86e958
The Americans can move to a cheaper country because of the strength of the US dollar and many are doing so. Iranians cannot do that as Iranian currency is worthless these days.You are in fantasy land if you think the inflation crisis is exclusive to Iran. I gave you facts. The job market, and the economy in the US, the biggest economy in the world is bad. You have over 50 million people relying on food banks. That is the government's own data .
Agreed. So, why does the regime continue this needless policy? It seems that both of us agree that it is not our responsibility to fight this war for the Palestinians.Is the regime incompetent? Yes. Has it all been a disaster? No. You need to examine real data sets. You can not compare Iran to Germany. You can not compare Iran with Israel. In 1979, only 25% of the women were literate. How does that look today?
Did the regime need to antagonize world Jewry? No
Is the Palestinian tragedy our fight and our fight alone? No. There are two billion muslims in the world; other than the Axis, no one has taken a stance.
China never asked for this, to be honest. China is not interested in a clash with the US, at least at this point, the Ayatollahs are.Iran can choose to be a patsy of the US, a puppet regime, or hope that China will step in and support it in ways that it supports Pakistan. All roads lead to China. The Ukraine war leads to China. The 12-day war between Iran/ Israel 12 day war leads to China.
We are back to the time of the Qajar era. I will reiterate what I have said times and times again here. The conservative party is full of Russian shills, and the reformist party is full of Western-backed shills. We do not have independents in Iran anymore.I don’t understand the appeals coming from Zarif’s camp, who, in effect, operates as the de facto president. What exactly does Europe have to offer Iran? Iran does not need Europe; it can sell its oil to China and others without relying on European support. Europeans seem to be in a state of ideological decline, Nihilism. Look at the self-destructive policies rooted in white guilt—allowing uncontrolled migration that undermines their national identity. Why should Iran engage seriously with a bloc that offers little of value?
More for 99% intercepted crowd.
Israel is the best. They are number one. You can rest assured, the other missiles just fell in open fields. One cow, a druze child, and an old shed were the only ones damaged.
irrelevant to what I was saying but sureIranian officials never disclosed how many missiles were fired.


View attachment 137024
Israel claims Iran fired 574 missiles at Israel in 12 days
Israel and the US attempted to intercept 258 of these missiles, intercepting 201/258 (78%), with 57 (22%) successful impacts at these highly protected areas
the remainder of the missiles fired by Iran (316) were not intercepted and many of these impacted in what Israel calls 'unpopulated' areas, such as military bases (see below). though many likely missed and hit open areas too.
View attachment 137026
57 + 316 = 373 missiles impacted in Israel / 574 missiles fired = 65% overall missile penetration rate (35% interception rate)
the problem is not penetration or quantities, it is accuracy and reliability. this is what is needed to convert missile impacts into achieving military objectives.
@ShapurII
Excellent analysis by someone who has the credentials to make the claims in the video.
Yes, my 44% interception rate was based on similar calculations, but initially they claimed Iran had fired 600 missiles.View attachment 137024
Israel claims Iran fired 574 missiles at Israel in 12 days
Israel and the US attempted to intercept 258 of these missiles, intercepting 201/258 (78%), with 57 (22%) successful impacts at these highly protected areas
the remainder of the missiles fired by Iran (316) were not intercepted and many of these impacted in what Israel calls 'unpopulated' areas, such as military bases (see below). though many likely missed and hit open areas too.
View attachment 137026
57 + 316 = 373 missiles impacted in Israel / 574 missiles fired = 65% overall missile penetration rate (35% interception rate)
the problem is not penetration or quantities, it is accuracy and reliability. this is what is needed to convert missile impacts into achieving military objectives.
@ShapurII
missile launch rate did drop dramatically in the final daysYes, my 44% interception rate was based on similar calculations, but initially they claimed Iran had fired 600 missiles.
Overall, they intercepted 40% of the missiles, give or take 5%.
If we had continued to fire more missiles, the interception rate would've likely fallen below 20% after a week. We just needed to keep going.
I think our missiles did fine, it was our drones that disappointed us and was a major blow to our deterrence. And our cruise missiles were not used for unknown reasons, probably because we didn't have enough drones to fire simultaneously at the time.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.