Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And for all the misgivings people may have about the Field Marshall, he has played Trump masterfully, as we would expect from an intelligence chief. The game is not about how things ought to be but how they are perceived to be. Pakistan build a perception, while Indian egos have wrecked theirs; Wish-waguru aka Visa-waguru and the like.Right.
Also, one thing for sure: Americans are far more capable of destroying the Indian economy then vice versa. A mere equitable distribution of H1B visas and preventing loop holes in outsourcing/offshoring will start to hurt India. Someone here posted a video where a Trump affiliate is blaming India for 'visa frauds'; that tells you that Americans are aware of the Indian shenanigans. There is plenty of skilled labors spread over dozens of poor countries who'd take over and it wouldn't surprise me that Indian companies based in America themselves who'd be part of such offshoring/outsourcing if the Americans decide to punish India.
Indians here are in denial if they think that Trump is not bullying them to get concessions: 'Do More!' . India doesn't have the leverage to counter a person like Trump who takes personal slights too personally. There are some Indian analysts who are even saying to lay low until Trump becomes a Lame Duck President after the Nov. 2026 Mid Term elections.
India trying to secure their arbitrage; probably going to ask Putin for more price concessions to make up for the “Trump Squeeze”.India sends two negotiators to Moscow amid Trump’s sanctions threat
![]()
Modi is confrontational mood.
India trying to secure their arbitrage; probably going to ask Putin for more price concessions to make up for the “Trump Squeeze”.
Now Pakistan just needs to work on getting its companies at least competitive enough to draw business away from Indian companies. Pakistan needs to leverage and reforming nearly everything it has to start growing at least 8% to change global perceptions.More ammunition for Trump against Hindustan.
View attachment 138996
Tariffs will mostly be paid by those who source products into the country, by retailers, or by those who pass them on to consumers.
Trump hasn't won a trade deal with any major country, and Pakistan can't even be considered a major country economically, where Trump can claim a home run victory. The main tension between Trump and India is the trade negotiations; the main sectors it wants to open up for its export markets are agriculture and dairy. The Indians are hesitant, as more than half of their population relies on this sector and has heavy barriers to entry. The U.S. agriculture sector is badly hurt due to Chinese restrictions and is sourcing more of the products from South America and Australia. [The agriculture and dairy sector is also an issue between Canada and the U.S.]
The second sector is energy; the U.S. wants enough access for India to become reliant on it and not on Russia. The Indians do not want to be energy dependent on a single source; they don't want to solely rely on U.S. LNG and other fossil fuels, but have diversification. As the current rates are, its purchasing has allowed international rates to be maintained along with domestic prices, and is a factor in its output of goods, as energy costs are a main input.
Do note, Trump asked other Quad members to choose if they would go to war with China; to date, there has been a muted public response from non-Indian member states.
First, Pakistani's were up in the air, they need to choose to confront China, then it comes to Russia, and India must choose from other sources, I'm wondering what it will be tomorrow. I don't know if I should laugh or cry at my countrymen.
For all intents and purposes, Trump thinks like a businessman and nothing else; he's not a politician. He thinks everything in terms of monetary gain.
Note: To this day, the West, including the U.S., is purchasing raw materials from Russia; it itself isn't practicing what it's preaching, so this should tell you the issues are elsewhere. He's trying to dangle a threat in front of India.
India is sticking to its neutral stance, and even when there's U.S. pressure, it's taking a pragmatic approach; it's not going to be a decision akin to flipping a switch overnight, it doesn't operate like Pakistan under the weight of a threat.
In all this, I wonder if Pakistan is evaluating its stance. It's trying to cozy up to the U.S., and with Gulf Allies in the U.S. camp, what will it do when the time comes? The Pakistanis do not have much moat to weather a storm when it comes their way.
It's what I have been trying to explain to our Pakistani brethren, but many have developed shit for brains. @kmc_chacko has said it as simply as possible without being technical.
All Trump wants is access to two main sectors in India, which are well protected and for good reason. It's not any different than Canada protecting theirs.
This whole fight with China is also getting out of hand, as India has never stated its intention from the beginning to become physical; several months ago, Trump asked other QUAD members, and they had a muted response if they would come and fight China.
Those saying India took money from the West and the U.S.; the answer is, no, India offered a service, the others paid for it, the West had other options, it chose what was economical for it, it never came with strings attached.
Tariffs will mostly be paid by those who source products into the country, by retailers, or by those who pass them on to consumers.
Trump hasn't won a trade deal with any major country, and Pakistan can't even be considered a major country economically, where Trump can claim a home run victory. The main tension between Trump and India is the trade negotiations; the main sectors it wants to open up for its export markets are agriculture and dairy. The Indians are hesitant, as more than half of their population relies on this sector and has heavy barriers to entry. The U.S...
Lastly, I'm well-versed in economics, as it was my field of study in the U.S.;
India would never allow any military operations from its soil. This has been a policy decision since 1947 and isn’t likely to be changed. This is well known all across as well as Trump administration.No one thinks this is the “end” of the Indo-US relationship, but the US raising the stakes for what it expects, in exchange for market access. Also the quad may not be. Treaty based collective defense organization, but the way LEMOA allows the kind of temporary basing for repair arrangements are:
1. Seen as the foundations for something more by China.
2. It is the Indian reluctance to not get drawn in, because during biden’s tenure, only so much was asked of India. Trump has raised the expectations, as China appears to be harder to contain than what he or the American policy making class had estimated.
3. India’s poor performance, at least as far as Trump is concerned, has him second guessing why India deserves market access when India doesn’t align with greater US interests.
Munir is being made to be larger than what he is.And for all the misgivings people may have about the Field Marshall, he has played Trump masterfully, as we would expect from an intelligence chief. The game is not about how things ought to be but how they are perceived to be. Pakistan build a perception, while Indian egos have wrecked theirs; Wish-waguru aka Visa-waguru and the like.
And Modi didn't give a flying F about what you all got to say. Neither will he talk about what Trump and address the President directly. Diplomacy 101. You can learn a thing or two about that. I understand the silence is killing many. But he's going to leave the talking part to foreign affairs like he should and talk to Trump face to face when he gets time.Not sure if you even can read plain English. Imran Khan and every Pakistani PM during Modi's tenure have all directly named Modi and implicated him when criticising his policies or narratives against Pakistan. The evidence is in plain sight.
I am asking when Modi will directly call out Donald Trump for his attack on India. Pakistani PMs do not hesitate to declare Modi as the cause of hindutva hatred manifesting as acts of war against Pakistan. There are many such statements. Here is but one:
Imran Khan: "I want to reiterate that my govt will continue to expose India's belligerent designs towards Pakistan & Modi govt's fascism. Int community must stop India from its reckless, militarist agenda before the Modi govt's brinkmanship pushes our region into a conflict it cannot control."
Where is Modi's scathing critique of Trump or even of Trump's government? Will Modi not even take the man's name as the direct cause of India's current tariff headache?
It's fine. I get that you are embarrassed by the saviour of Indian civilisations quiet ruminating. Embarrassment builds character though.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.