you said "Hezbollah's rockets did not bring down buildings" and I showed you videos of buildings destroyed in Israel by Hezbollah's rockets. pretty simple
How do you know those are official communiques? It's the internet, people post crazy stuff. And, yes we have idiots in uniform saying shit, but not officially....that's hardly propaganda. Who was it that said Israel was using the weather to attack Iran? I forget....it doesn't matter, as a consumer of information, it's up to you to parse through the bs and get to the real information. In the US we had Marjorie Taylor Green saying the Jews were using space lasers to control our weather...she's in govt, but she's still a kook. The statement didn't come from the State Dept....it was her on Twitter. In the US just recently they were on the news talking about Iran having sleeper cells in the US ready to attack Americans.....despite the fact, no Iranian has ever attacked Americans in the history of the IRI.
I'm glad you posted those....I wanted to lay bare the difference of you guys spouting inaptitude of Iranians.....in short, your evidence is thin. As I said in my earlier post, I don't belong to either of the two camps, the people who are REALLY delusional about Iran being a winner in all things vs the expats that Iran is so incompetent it can't pour piss out of a boot, if the instruction were written on the bottom.
not really sure how to make sense of this response to my rebuttal to your incorrect assertion that "Hezbollah's rockets did not bring down buildings"
Easy... Both camps are in the extreme. So much conjecture and not enough substance. I like discussing strategy, I don't like to wallow in the same old same old. I'm here to see if we can do things differently. Obviously there are people inside the government reading these forms. Hopefully with some of our discussions they may be able to approach things a bit more competently.
Sometimes I wish that were true, but I doubt that it is.
Do you know any younger more competent leaders?
Hezbollah under Nasrallah wanted to do the same and we saw how that turned out
www.asriran.com
Not really. That's the problem with authoritarian systems. They rarely care about raising a replacement, as they want to hold onto power until the very last moment.
Didn't they stab him in the back last time? The Guardian Council rejected his candidacy. I remember Omid Dana was so excited about this dude to the point that he event went on as far as saying that he was certain that he would be the president.
They're dealing with two nuclear powers while having no nukes, no air force and no IADS. Normally, under conditions like this, where one side is significantly stronger than the other, the weaker side either goes for nuclear deterrence (like North Korea did), or surrender. It seems that they're preparing for the latter.
www.entekhab.ir
good analysis, clear conclusion that Iran must focus on generating wealth instead of pursuing global justicea rather good view
دکتر سریعالقلم: سه سناریو پیش روی ایران است؛ توافق، جنگ و اعتراضات شدید داخلی یا ...
سریع القلم گفت: امروز میبینیم که مبنای قدرت «هوش مصنوعی» است و مرکز آن در آمریکاست. اما کشور امارات قول داده که تا سال ۲۰۳۰ در آمریکا نزدیک به ۴۵ میلیارد دل...
So short sighted. Don't they understand that having competent generals is the requisite to allowing them to stay in power. You can have someone at face value be the most loyal looking servant, and then they sh*t the bed in a crisis situation, leading to your downfall.
