India Lucky Not To Lose More Than Four Rafales

10 year old seekers. You lot need source code to make minor changes to planes.

Good luck with replicating the missiles though Rakesh
One seeker is probably already in US hands. Not the same thing than indian ones my dear stud.
 
ohh dear, are you even capable of remembering your own words?!!!

cant you see the (binary) asymmetric contrasts here!

PL 15 was a failure of huge proportions!!!!!

to the contrary, in reality, converse is true, USAF has decided to give a long range missile a full go!!!

how come?!!

View attachment 142930
???

US is well equipped, with AMRAAM D and the futur XAIM-174B.

Europe already has Meteor, so....
 
???

US is well equipped, with AMRAAM D and the futur XAIM-174B.

Europe already has Meteor, so....


so?!!!


your argument breaks!
 
One seeker is probably already in US hands. Not the same thing than indian ones my dear stud.

Yes, US copying a 10 year old seeker head. Good luck with that. If you think China has not progressed in missile tech shows that you are very ignorant my little fake "Frenchman"...
 
Seems like 7 planes now according to Trump

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

he was updated on the final score. 7 jets including 4 Rafales.
 
It is not my version. I gave my source, and if you make some internet search you will find others.

Why not study the seeker of an ennemy missile? It can give you very precious datas, as frequency (or frequencies) used, electronic counter counter measures used (or not) to counter it and the level of integration of the discret components and some other datas (I'm not electronical engineer).

Why do you think US and NATO were very found of all the russian electronic counter measures shelters found intact or nearly intact in ukraine?

Why do you think USA were very happy with USSR fighters delivered intact by their pilots who wanted to go in the west ?
Oh poor Rakesh!
You remind me another Indian poster who in old pdf claimed "China is just putting more fuel in missiles to go them fly longer". 🙄🙄
 
How has Meteor worked out in combat so far?
I believe it was "Raj" on old pdf who had a very lengthy argument session about PL-15 and meteor properties. That time India just inducted Rafales and they were very proud of meteor and it's lethality. Someone said PL-15 and other Chinese missiles have more range and Indian troll very mockingly said that Chinese tech was very poor, copy paste bla bla and that "China was just putting more and more motor fuel inside missiles instead of electronics".
Everyone of us laughed so hardly. This guy was lecturing all of us like a professional missile scientist.
May war proved how much wrong he was.
This Rakesh aka Bon plan is a twin brother of Raj.
 
???

US is well equipped, with AMRAAM D and the futur XAIM-174B.

Europe already has Meteor, so....
Still they are struggling just to meet the PL-15 parameters? Strange huh?
And yet there is PL-16, a totally new and advanced tech in the same size envelope of PL-15.
I am not going to discuss PL-17 or PL-21 (PL-XX). 😉
 
I don't think any ground attack was launched by PAF other than S400 mission
Hi, PAF crewmembers at RIAT 2025 said the JF-17s were used to launch ordinance at Indian airbases and C4 nodes. I did not ask for nor was I provided any further details.
 
Last edited:
How has Meteor worked out in combat so far?
fortunately for your arse, they were not used in day one.

But as PAF totally deseappear of the sky day 2 and 3, it probably has been mounted on Rafale my dear stud.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top