India Lucky Not To Lose More Than Four Rafales

Its only matter of time now that he specifically say 7 Indian jets. Likes of Rubio and CIA brief him. CIA doesn't even have to show bob and vagena to lure Indian officials.

Well when he mentioned the 7 jets he looked at Rubio who nodded.

This seems to me to confirm

4 definate Rafale kills
1 definate SU-30. kill
1 definate Mirage 2000 kill
1 definate MIG-29 kill

i suspect now what is being revealed behind closed doors, possibly by the French, is that 1-2 extra Rafales limped back to bse and are now write offs. Hence why Trump goes on to say maybe 8 or more

We could be looking at potentially 6 Rafales lost. This also syncs with Warnes cryptic post that the IAF were lucky not to have lost more then 4. Its seems he may have seen evidence which shows we damaged more. These damaged ones now may be decared beyond repair
 
He is teasing India over tariffs or getting them buy American Jets (F35s or American engines). He is coming close, very close to take Indian airforce name directly as the loser. This $150 million planes statement was specific to Rafales.

I wouldn't read too much into $150million reference, he does tend to refer to stuff that he half remembers at times.
 
This really is bad, with the $150 million and more then 7 planes and "they are not saying how many", this is as close he has come to saying the planes were Indian and now I think he is pressuring Modi on this as well as trade deal. I said earlier, Trump knows exactly what he is saying and despite the bafoonery, is choosing his words carefully here.

Also expect some Indian know to spec up a $150 million Super F-16V.....
Lockheed about to dustoff their F-21 concept for the 3rd time just for the Indians to reject it again because 'a certain someone bought F-16s for free from the united states'
 
Well when he mentioned the 7 jets he looked at Rubio who nodded.

This seems to me to confirm

4 definate Rafale kills
1 definate SU-30. kill
1 definate Mirage 2000 kill
1 definate MIG-29 kill

i suspect now what is being revealed behind closed doors, possibly by the French, is that 1-2 extra Rafales limped back to bse and are now write offs. Hence why Trump goes on to say maybe 8 or more

We could be looking at potentially 6 Rafales lost. This also syncs with Warnes cryptic post that the IAF were lucky not to have lost more then 4. Its seems he may have seen evidence which shows we damaged more. These damaged ones now may be decared beyond repair

a new dawn!
 
Well when he mentioned the 7 jets he looked at Rubio who nodded.

This seems to me to confirm

4 definate Rafale kills
1 definate SU-30. kill
1 definate Mirage 2000 kill
1 definate MIG-29 kill

i suspect now what is being revealed behind closed doors, possibly by the French, is that 1-2 extra Rafales limped back to bse and are now write offs. Hence why Trump goes on to say maybe 8 or more

We could be looking at potentially 6 Rafales lost. This also syncs with Warnes cryptic post that the IAF were lucky not to have lost more then 4. Its seems he may have seen evidence which shows we damaged more. These damaged ones now may be decared beyond repair
Alan Warnes also said that PAF air chief explained why it took 2 months to confirm the 4th hull loss of Rafale....and that makes sense now.........AVM Aurangzeb began his second briefing with 6-0. Meaning 6 were confirmed shot down then and there.

Then 7th one, PAF had intelligence that it limped back to base only to be written off after confirming obviously through intel sources, the visits by Dassault team who would have declared it hull loss. Hence a solid 7 aircraft lost number is now valid. Same with US intelligence, they would have pretty much confirmed it as well.

Trump looking to Rubio and Rubio nodding is because Rubio is like, Dayem these Pakis......imagine if all these 7 kills had been by F-16s.....imagine the cash cow for next 20 years that F-16Vs would have gotten had we given Pakistan F-16Vs earlier........ :ROFLMAO:

Give Pakistan F-16Vs, so LM can celebrate shooting down French and Russian jets.

......and no one is even talking about the loss of M2K.....Dassault must really be pissed at bhindians.
 
Alan Warnes also said that PAF air chief explained why it took 2 months to confirm the 4th hull loss of Rafale....and that makes sense now.........AVM Aurangzeb began his second briefing with 6-0. Meaning 6 were confirmed shot down then and there.

Then 7th one, PAF had intelligence that it limped back to base only to be written off after confirming obviously through intel sources, the visits by Dassault team who would have declared it hull loss. Hence a solid 7 aircraft lost number is now valid. Same with US intelligence, they would have pretty much confirmed it as well.

Trump looking to Rubio and Rubio nodding is because Rubio is like, Dayem these Pakis......imagine if all these 7 kills had been by F-16s.....imagine the cash cow for next 20 years that F-16Vs would have gotten had we given Pakistan F-16Vs earlier........ :ROFLMAO:

Give Pakistan F-16Vs, so LM can celebrate shooting down French and Russian jets.

......and no one is even talking about the loss of M2K.....Dassault must really be pissed at bhindians.

If it is 5-6 Rafales they have a big problem now.

Essentially reduced to 1.5 Squadrons. If 30 airframes, and say availability is 75%, gives them only 22 odd planes to send into the fight.

PAF combined AESA/PL-15 force is around 30 Block3s and 25 J-10Cs. That is 55 odd planes.. At 75% availability, gives us around 40 planes.
 
shorter length or shorter range?
Maybe shorter length (don't have the time to check) but sure not shorter range.
Meteor was not used, as said 100 x time, because Rafale was used for Air to Ground missions only during day 1.
But as the PAF jets were suddenly stealthy day 3 and 4, we may imagine they were fitted on, or you were short of air missiles.

And, please, find a way between you all about the number of Rafale grounded ! It goes from 1 to .... 5 and even more.

Sad reality is 1, just one, and no one here knows why.
Shorter range **
My English is not as good as someone like you who is also French and working as an engineer at Dassault.
I admire your English skills Rakesh.
But again I will insist to correct you that meteor was not used because PAF electric jamming didn't let it happen. Plus meteor was well enough out ranged by PL-15E.
IAF Rafales didn't even get chance to fire their meteors. After the first PL-15E struck on of Rafales it was just chaos on IAF side.
Every IAF pilot to his mates was screaming "bhaag Arjun bhaag". No one even remembered they had to fire any meteors.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top