India Lucky Not To Lose More Than Four Rafales

[TopGun786]

No. there is absolutely NO EVIDENCE.

So downing 4 IAF Rafales + plus at lest three other IAF jets (Su-30 mki, MIG-29 & Mirage 2000) by PL-15E while losing none of our own is "not an evidence" for you.
Strange logic Rakesh... Very strange.
You need to visit a mental hospital.

 

[Yasser76]

No. there is absolutely NO EVIDENCE.
It is you dream.

Fact is that Meteor was not used in day 1 for reasons explained so many times on differents thread here.
And day 3 & 4 PAF was hidding.

I have not seen a picture of your brain,, by that logic and your writings on here, there is NO EVIDENCE you have a brain

 

[kimjongun]

No. there is absolutely NO EVIDENCE.
It is you dream.

Fact is that Meteor was not used in day 1 for reasons explained so many times on differents thread here.
And day 3 & 4 PAF was hidding.

smooth brain comment

 

[Ak01]

No. there is absolutely NO EVIDENCE.
It is you dream.

Fact is that Meteor was not used in day 1 for reasons explained so many times on differents thread here.
And day 3 & 4 PAF was hidding.

the cope is crazy baguette.

should have stuck with the eurofighter, the superior aircraft.

 

[Master Chief]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

In that 3 minute sequence that MKI ate atleast a dozen 20mm rounds, pulled retarded moves that would gotten sidewinders shoved up its ass in real life and that happens atleast half a dozen time not to mention the the pilot pulling enough Gs to turn his brain into mush, and of course the green f-16 and the pilot wearing surma, he is probably named jahazuddin aatangwadi surprised they didn't make him wear a white cap

"Jahazuddin".

Lol.

 

[Master Chief]

No. there is absolutely NO EVIDENCE.
It is you dream.

Fact is that Meteor was not used in day 1 for reasons explained so many times on differents thread here.
And day 3 & 4 PAF was hidding.

You are really becoming an embarrassment to French people. And that is quite an achievement.

 

[Blain2]

No. there is absolutely NO EVIDENCE.
It is you dream.

Fact is that Meteor was not used in day 1 for reasons explained so many times on differents thread here.
And day 3 & 4 PAF was hidding.

Clueless as usual.

 

[BonPlan]

the cope is crazy baguette.

should have stuck with the eurofighter, the superior aircraft.View attachment 143439

So superior that 4 partners were unable to export it more than a single one.

So superior that during a training in scotland in september 2009 Rafale won 9-1 against RAF EF2000.

 

[BonPlan]

You are really becoming an embarrassment to French people. And that is quite an achievement.

Only an embarrassment for some of you, no?

Instead of speaking of embarrassement, use argument.

 

[Yasser76]

So superior that 4 partners were unable to export it more than a single one.

So superior that during a training in scotland in september 2009 Rafale won 9-1 against RAF EF2000.

Cope harder Nirav

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[BonPlan]

I have not seen a picture of your brain,, by that logic and your writings on here, there is NO EVIDENCE you have a brain

argument please.
your moods don't interest anyone.

 

[Yasser76]

argument please.
your moods don't interest anyone.

Neither do your blanket statements, make stupid comments, expect them back and to be laughed at

 

[Master Chief]

Only an embarrassment for some of you, no?

Instead of speaking of embarrassement, use argument.

What for? Why would anyone repeat the same points already made a hundred times?

Do you learn from the countless lessons that have been taught to you on these pages or do you simply run away for two days, pretend the "arguments" weren't stated to you in the first place and then repeat your bizarre demands?

You avert your eyes from pictures of destroyed wrecks of Rafales.

You disregard eye witness testimony from the scenes of destroyed jets.

You ignore the statements of Indian Air Force officials themselves regarding destroyed IAF assets and regarding the absence of any restrictions placed on them during the events of May's conflict.

Fair enough that Indian officials often contradict one another - I'll accept that as a reasonable cause for scepticism.

But why ignore the other evidence to suit your agenda?

If you worked at Dassault, fair enough, but why be angry at the PAF, rather than at the IAF who are the real reason your ex-employee share portfolio has tanked?

 

[Yasser76]

What for? Why would anyone repeat the same points already made a hundred times?

Do you learn from the countless lessons that have been taught to you on these pages or do you simply run away for two days, pretend the "arguments" weren't stated to you in the first place and then repeat your bizarre demands?

You avert your eyes from pictures of destroyed wrecks of Rafales.

You disregard eye witness testimony from the scenes of destroyed jets.

You ignore the statements of Indian Air Force officials themselves regarding destroyed IAF assets and regarding the absence of any restrictions placed on them during the events of May's conflict.

Fair enough that Indian officials often contradict one another - I'll accept that as a reasonable cause for scepticism.

But why ignore the other evidence to suit your agenda?

If you worked at Dassault, fair enough, but why be angry at the PAF, rather than at the IAF who are the real reason your ex-employee share portfolio has tanked?

You provide evidence, he ignores it, then asks for evidence. In doing so the thread goes down the shit hole.

 

[BonPlan]

but why be angry at the PAF

I'm not.
I just explain that so far there is no evidence Indian lose more than 1 Rafale (not to speak of 4 and some said "even more"). And even for this one it is not clear it has been fired by a PL-15.
If you or someone else has evidence, please share it. But please don't show me a wreck of something impossible to identify (we just see scrap metal with one wheel...).

Without evidence don't be surprised I counter the vague explanations that are more about Pakistani patriotism.