nahtanbob
Elite Member
What is the anti-China alliance ? There is no alliance until countries cut back or are forced to cut back on trade with ChinaYes. The anti-China alliance failed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is the anti-China alliance ? There is no alliance until countries cut back or are forced to cut back on trade with ChinaYes. The anti-China alliance failed.
Kindly look the profile of writers.
Such articles does hold any legitimacy, if there indian writer, he will similar write what best suits for indian perspective
This is the moment Trump realised Modi is a tyrant and could risk a genocide or a nuclear war. 10 months ago.
US know they enabled a monster.
For the first time in 3 decades, India isn't dictating the Pakistan policy in Washtington.
Actually , all this video tell you is that India has always refused US mediation and it was a "certain country" that went running to Daddy to save them when they couldnt handle the heat.
Was India ever anti China?What is the anti-China alliance ? There is no alliance until countries cut back or are forced to cut back on trade with China
How will China protect India from US tariffs ? India is just normalising relations with China. Anyway, China is a small market for Indian exports and itself is an exporter of many Indian exports goods impacted by US tariffs.If we are talking about daddy, is modi not going to his Chinese daddy to protect him on u.s tariffs?
India doesn't have any strategic enemies. India stopped the fighting because its objective of demonstrating that it will respond to terrorists attacks by targetting perpetrators deep inside Pakistan had been achieved and Pakistan was asking for a ceasefire. There is no reason to keep fighting after your aims have been achieved.They are meant to be your strategic enemy......
And India has always accepted mediation, otherwise why did they stop?
Was India ever anti China?
Not really.
India needs China far more than China
Doubt they want Pakistan as a mediator but more as a facilitator for the order they seek to build, with China seeking growth. They want to compete with China in Central Asia and any routes china (but also Russia and Iran) has to other regions. Pakistan sits at an important junction, to the Indian Ocean and on the way to the global south.Good points. Pakistan also gives the US that no other nation gives, beyond the Rare Earth's which, alone are critical for US. Pakistan also gives influence over Iran, Middle East, Africa and China. These nations listen to Pakistan closely and trust Pakistan.
People in the US administration are not war hawks. Trump doesn't want wars. He shares the same business concept like China. Peace is the best stimulant for business activity. So when Trump / US administration wants no wars, they can't stop conflicts. So if conflicts happen through or in so many of these nations mentioned above, with or without the US's involvement, Pakistan can help mediate. Pakistan's role alone that it can play between the US and China is enough for it to be considered a regional player. But our reach is far beyond.
We need only listen to Clinton’s speech when China was allowed into the WTO. China found ways to bend the rules. India won’t get that much leeway nor is it likely to be as cunning to be quietly focused to outgrow the terms on its access.Agreed. Your analysis is spot on.
I was careful not to say state department official. I said official in the current administration. Those boomers with nostalgia for the 80s.Any State Department official who was 30 in 1988 is 67 now
the author's profile
![]()
Uzair Younus
Uzair Younus was a nonresident senior fellow and the former director of the Pakistan Initiative at the Atlantic Council’s South Asia Center.www.atlanticcouncil.org
The United States has a lot of leverage over Pakistan right now. If the Pakistan Democracy Act passes, the US Congress and gets signed into law, the current regime in Pakistan will collapse. The Trump administration and the regime both know that the US has them by the balls and the hybrid regime serves at Trump's pleasure. So, the US will extract maximum advantage and use Pakistan to do its "dirty work " - to borrow a phrase from Pakistan's defence minister.I’ve been following Western and U.S. media, and apart from a single article offering a different angle, I find it hard to verify if what it says is actually true.
To me, the situation feels like a bubble. Trump’s unpredictability, and the fact that he acts more like a businessman than a political leader, has already caused damage to India–U.S. relations.
When that bubble eventually bursts—for example, if the war in Ukraine ends—I believe the U.S. will again try to improve ties with India. But since India has capable foreign policy makers, they won’t rush into it. The damage to trust has already been done.
Sooner or later, the U.S. will try to win India back, but I don’t see this changing the long-term trajectory
As for Pakistan, its value to the U.S. is mainly strategic—location, Iran, Afghanistan, and to some extent China. Beyond that, I don’t see much depth in the relationship. Washington will maintain some level of engagement with Pakistan, but nothing substantial.
In short, I don’t see any major policy changes happening right now
“I see Pakistani leaders as often willing to compromise with the U.S. for short-term gains.The United States has a lot of leverage over Pakistan right now. If the Pakistan Democracy Act passes, the US Congress and gets signed into law, the current regime in Pakistan will collapse. The Trump administration and the regime both know that the US has them by the balls and the hybrid regime serves at Trump's pleasure. So, the US will extract maximum advantage and use Pakistan to do its "dirty work " - to borrow a phrase from Pakistan's defence minister.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.