Iranian Nuclear Doctrine

Shafagh said:
Guys, forgive my ignorance here.

What sort of sanctions are we actually talking about that are no longer in effect, and would be re-imposed via Snapback mechanism? Is Europe or the rest of the world actually doing much business with Iran since Trump re-imposed unilaterial sanctions?

I thought the U.S sanctions are so far reaching, that is essentially pushed the world out of doing business with Iran anyway. What damage could Snapback do?
Click to expand...
Besides sanctions on shipping, it also reinstates Iran as a threat to global peace.
Bringing back Iran to a country that falls under Chapter VII of the UN charter.
They have already used Article 41 on Iran. Next step would be Article 42, if China and Russia does not veto it.
 
ShapurII said:
Besides sanctions on shipping, it also reinstates Iran as a threat to global peace.
Bringing back Iran to a country that falls under Chapter VII of the UN charter.
They have already used Article 41 on Iran. Next step would be Article 42, if China and Russia does not veto it.
Click to expand...
Why would the Chinese and Russians not veto it?
 
Shafagh said:
Guys, forgive my ignorance here.

What sort of sanctions are we actually talking about that are no longer in effect, and would be re-imposed via Snapback mechanism? Is Europe or the rest of the world actually doing much business with Iran since Trump re-imposed unilaterial sanctions?

I thought the U.S sanctions are so far reaching, that is essentially pushed the world out of doing business with Iran anyway. What damage could Snapback do?
Click to expand...
The current embargoes on Iran are implemented by the Jewish-Zionist lobby that controls the US, and the US then pressures countries not to do business with Iran. With SNAPBACK officially activated, this embargo would be UN-enforced (of course, it would be violated by many, but it would come from the UN).

However, the JCPO states that those who violate the treaty cannot activate SNAPBACK. In 2020, the US tried to activate SNAPBACK but failed because they violated the treaty. The Europeans also violated it and legally cannot activate SNAPBACK. This is why they have not yet activated it and only have until October 2025 to do so. Even if they try, it will not be straightforward and will not follow the usual procedure, as only those who are 100% active in the JCPO could do so, and this is not the case. So, the Europeans (pressured by the Jews Zionist ) will attempt a "legal coup" with the support of the Jewish Zionist media to push a narrative that Iran MUST BE condemned by the UN Security Council, however (as they violated the JCPO), a legal battle will follow from this.
 
Shafagh said:
Why would the Chinese and Russians not veto it?
Click to expand...
they didn't veto the Chapter VII UNSC Resolution 1973 for Libya in 2011 and they didn't veto UNSC Resolution 1441 for Iraq in 2002.

they didn't veto UNSC Resolutions 1737, 1747, 1803 or 1929 adopted under Chapter VII against Iran from 2006-2010.
 
^

Some fools still think because Iran fights "West" it must be sitting in sweet lap of Russia and China lol.

Russia is a historical enemy of Iran who has occupied Iranian land. Bloody wars had to be fought to keep them at bay. China sees Iran as easy oil-cow with no other option than to sell subsidised oil to China. No strategic "alliance" exists between IRI and these two.
 
President Sisi met today with both the Iranian Foreign Minister and the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, where he officially announced the reaching of an agreement resume cooperation between them following the success of Egypt’s mediation efforts began last August, despite the challenges posed by the Iranian-Israeli war.The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency stated that the success of the negotiations between the agency and Iran, and the conclusion of the agreement, was due to Egypt’s weight, status, and strategic position, as well as President Sisi’s oversight and follow-up on the negotiations, adding that without this, reaching this historic agreement would not have been possible.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Golden words by fereydoun abbasi 👇


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Now with the defence pact between Pakistan and KSA , we should have nukes ...
 
بله اسنپ بک نیست
تو که راست میگی !

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
این ویدیو رو حتمن ببینید:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
TP 4 Iran Quds 2026 said:
بله اسنپ بک نیست
تو که راست میگی !

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top