All trolling aside, here is my view being a product of the H1B program mywelf.
@RescueRanger , this is my serious contribution and no more chutkalay
@Jango , it touches on some of the fraud you were asking about...
Full disclosure: Used ChatGPT to articulate my thoughts clearly.
My Experience with H1B Employment – 25 Years in Tech
I’ve seen the H1B system from multiple angles over the past 25 years — as a student, an immigrant employee, and now as a senior engineering manager at a FAANG company. I want to share my perspective because a lot of conversations about H1Bs either get stuck on extremes (all fraud / all merit), and the reality is more complex.
My background:
- Bachelor’s in Mechanical Engineering (NED University, Karachi, Pakistan).
- Came to the US in 2001 for my Master’s. Started in Mechanical/CFD but shifted into MIS (which was the precursor to today’s Data Analytics programs).
- Started working in 2004 for a large Midwest-based retailer. Did OPT → H1B (2005–2010) → Green Card process.
- I stayed with that employer until my I-140 and I-485 were done. This slowed down my career growth and salary progression in the early years, but I was risk-averse and wanted stability. @nahtanbob would refer to me as the lazy guy

- Today, I manage a team of 15 Data/BI engineers at a FAANG company in the Pacific Northwest. About 80–90% of them are immigrants, many on H1B/L1.
So what I share below is firsthand experience, not secondhand stories.
1. Outright Fraud (more common in the 90s/early 2000s)
Back in the dotcom boom (late 90s), there were small “sweatshop” consultancies that abused the H1B program. They would bring people in on fake resumes and “projects,” but those workers would actually end up working at gas stations or 7-Elevens until something real came up.
Other shady practices:
- Withholding wages or paying late to keep workers dependent.
- For example, a Pakistani friend of mine in the early 2000s went months without being paid properly by a shady consultancy until he finally reported them to INS/DOL. He eventually won backpay, but most people didn’t fight back.
This type of outright fraud has become much rarer today, though it still happens in pockets.
2. Resume Padding & Placement Shops
Another “gray area” I saw often in the 2000s was resume padding. Small consultancies would:
- Charge candidates ~$5k for training on a specific tool.
- Build fake resumes showing 5–7 years of experience.
- Provide fake references who vouched for them in interviews.
Some of my peers went through this. A Pakistani friend of mine (MS in Mechanical Engineering from a lower-tier US school) struggled to get interviews. He paid one of these firms (indian owned), they trained him on a database tool, faked his resume, and placed him at Boeing. Because he was smart and had an engineering background, he picked it up and succeeded.
But I also saw cases where candidates memorized scripts but lacked real depth, which frustrated managers and coworkers.
Sometimes, even senior leaders abused the system. At one company I worked for, an Indian director secretly co-owned a staffing firm with his brother-in-law. He created job postings that only his firm’s candidates could fill, effectively funneling business to himself. He was eventually fired and sued.
3. The Overrepresentation Flywheel
Fast forward to the 2010s: outright fraud decreased, but another dynamic took hold.
- Early Indian immigrants from the 90s/2000s rose to leadership positions.
- They pushed cost savings by creating offshore back offices in India, building a massive pipeline of talent.
- As those offshore teams gained experience, leaders began sponsoring them for H1B/L1 transfers into the US.
Now, in many tech companies (especially in the Pacific Northwest), you see an overwhelming majority of Indian employees not just in engineering, but also in recruiting, HR, finance, product, etc.
It’s not illegal, and in many cases it’s just network effects plus
unconscious bias. But the result is that:
- The hiring pipeline feels closed off to anyone outside of that system.
- Recruiters overwhelmingly source Indian resumes, even if average quality is mixed.
- Non-Indian candidates often struggle to even get interviews.
4. Resentment & Social Tensions
This has created some visible cultural/economic divides. In Seattle, for example:
- Many new H1B hires earn $200–300K+, dual-income couples earn $500–700K+, and they’re buying $1–2M homes.
- Long-time locals (including white Americans and even schoolteachers I’ve spoken to) are priced out of neighborhoods they grew up in.
- To outsiders, it all blurs together — Pakistani, Indian, Bangladeshi — we’re all just “brown tech workers.” And resentment is growing.
Final Thoughts
- Fraud exists — but much less than before.
- Resume padding & shady consultancies were a real gateway for many, sometimes helping people succeed, sometimes not.
- Overrepresentation isn’t fraud, but it’s real. The flywheel effect has tilted the system heavily toward one community, making entry difficult for others.
- The resentment is real and not just a political talking point — it’s a social undercurrent that will shape how H1Bs are perceived going forward.
That’s been my journey and what I’ve seen firsthand.