Pakistan-Af: Operation Khyber Storm

Status
Not open for further replies.
If the platforms want to crush this exploit they can. Twitter announced a couple days ago it will show the location of users to combat bot spam.

IMHO, if a user just blanket discounts users outside of their country to only hear domestic voices it can really clamp down on foreigner propaganda campaigns.

In the case of countries line India, it will put many of these bot farms of business. Indian tech firms know their reputation is such that their location status and especially their accents will automatically trigger western audiences to not think of them as credible. Indians are trying very hard to save their back office operations industry, but soon enough someone will come up with a challenge protocol to figure out if the voice on the other end is local or a foreigner.

Users don’t like to feel manipulated, there is growing pushback.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Screenshot 2025-10-17 194506.png
hypocrites
 
The perfect punishment for a TALIB leader..
Turn him into TUNDA.... Take away from him his private parts
... So these fkers loose hope of having anymore virgins at least in this world....
Hereafter is hellfire is waiting for them anyways just for the FACT WHEN PAKISTAN WAS WORKING FOR UNITY OF MUSLIMS THESE MUNAFIQS SHOWED TRUE COLORS BY DIVIDING MUSLIMS WITH THEIR YAHOODI TRICKS.. WE CAN SEE IT CLEARLY....
Standing with 2 enemies OF ALMIGHTY ALLAH AND HIS PROPHET
(M.P.B.U.H)
1. HINDU IDOL WORSHIPPERS
2. YAHOODI ISRAEL AND ITS AGENT INDIA..
CAN BE Perfectly described as
STABBING IN THE BACK OF PAKISTAN WHILE ITS DEALING WITH INDIA..
"BRUTUS!! YOU TOO"
Gem of a suggestion
 
We can’t look at the Muslim population there based on the religion so much any more, but on their ethnicity. Yes they’re Muslim, and we hope they are safe, but are a part of that system, and we have to not lose sight of the greater mission of keeping our country; a bubble outside of that system, safe.

It’s the same with the Afghans; Muslims mostly, but ethnicity, and tribe specifically comes first for them.
 
Exactly bro! Similarly, in a worst case hypothetical scenario, we could go all the way to the Helmand River and its tributaries, such as the Dori and Arghistan rivers, if we want to really create a natural defensive barrier in the Balochistan sector as a whole. Brutal fighting and ambushes would occur during the initial massive assault, but we would surely overwhelm them in a head-on mechanized combined arms assault.
View attachment 154717


Largely flat plains of the Sistan Desert (Registan), with very little population except near the eastern banks of these rivers, and a natural barrier that can be far more efficient for border security compared with the current border in Balochistan, where we have seen many infiltration attempts from the northern and central tips (the Sambaza incident near Zhob is a prime example).

Our ISR assets, command posts, and massive watchtowers can effectively monitor movement across these open expanses vs. a rugged mountainous terrain border.
View attachment 154720


But the real issue would surely be the funding, surveillance, and control over vast swaths of land, around 50,000 to 60,000 sq. km., and there would almost certainly be huge international, local, and Iranian backlash (the Helmand River flows into Iran, Iran's key water source).
View attachment 154719
Touche. I have already mentioned this on X. But you have given a beautiful visual representation to that idea.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Anyway, as far as Iranian are concerned, they will be actually happy that no dam is built it operated on the river, choking their supply.

ISR on the other hand is also easier in the desert than in the mountains of chagai.

There is also a flat land in the desert big enough where Pakistan could put a run way for drone base atleast or an airbase in the long term which will not only offer ISR in the sector but also depth against India if upgraded to a full fledged airbase.IMG_20251018_195234.jpg
 
@maverik

I know its irrelevant here but Pravin has been always corrct in his analysis. We have bloody fews years ahead of us

There will be no Sindoor 2.0. At least not for the next 5 years. IND doesn't have the political, diplomatic and military werewithal for that.

Regards
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
His entire speech is worth listening......he left no ambiguity in our policy stand and sent a clear message to India to keep their pajamas firmly tied .

A pretty shitty policy if i may. Btw, why are we accepting pre 1967 borders, if we do not even consider isreal as a state?

It makes no sense unless...

Anyway its not the right thread.
 
To your point about Talibs not representing Afghans, here is a brilliant Youtube episode - the way this Fellow explains is exceptional. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Their is a hint in this video .... If one can get it
 
A pretty shitty policy if i may. Btw, why are we accepting pre 1967 borders, if we do not even consider isreal as a state?

It makes no sense unless...

Anyway its not the right thread.
Bro , you are indulging yourself in semantics , hopefully you will get a happy ending.
 
Literally pointless.

The Afghans won't budge from their position.

Me too I don't expect much from the talks, Afghans unfortunately cannot be trusted every time they asked for a ceasefire, only to ambush Pakistan again.
 
Exactly bro! Similarly, in a worst case hypothetical scenario, we could go all the way to the Helmand River and its tributaries, such as the Dori and Arghistan rivers, if we want to really create a natural defensive barrier in the Balochistan sector as a whole. Brutal fighting and ambushes would occur during the initial massive assault, but we would surely overwhelm them in a head-on mechanized combined arms assault.
View attachment 154717


Largely flat plains of the Sistan Desert (Registan), with very little population except near the eastern banks of these rivers, and a natural barrier that can be far more efficient for border security compared with the current border in Balochistan, where we have seen many infiltration attempts from the northern and central tips (the Sambaza incident near Zhob is a prime example).

Our ISR assets, command posts, and massive watchtowers can effectively monitor movement across these open expanses vs. a rugged mountainous terrain border.
View attachment 154720


But the real issue would surely be the funding, surveillance, and control over vast swaths of land, around 50,000 to 60,000 sq. km., and there would almost certainly be huge international, local, and Iranian backlash (the Helmand River flows into Iran, Iran's key water source).
View attachment 154719
Bit of salami slicing of Afghanistan territory here and there should be Pakistan's undeclared and silent Afghan policy.
 
Literally pointless.

The Afghans won't budge from their position.
Give them 1 month. When nothing crosses the border and the trade route stays shut, they'll be scratching their head.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top