So much maligning of Pakistan and army, justification of anti-Pakistan, anti-army, pro Taliban narratives based on this assumption:
"unjustly imprisoned" and other assumptions like these ...
this is used to justify any and all actions. Once this word/assumption/belief is introduced, any illegal act can be justified. No cooperation with jailers, attacks on army, institutions, maligning of Pakistan, resistance to follow laws, street violence, killing law enforcement officers, advocating violence, all can be justified.
But none of us are the judge and jury on what goes on behind the curtains, are we ? If this as unjust, then was the California case unjust too ? Was the declaration to become PM not false in the fist place ? And this is only just one example, I can cite dozens more. Should that not be a moral ground to question if someone needs ot be accountable in the first place regarding themselves ? Rather than poisoning minds of 2 generations against one's own country ? Are morals only left out for others to follow ?
One person is always innocent even if proven guilty, while others are guilty even if proven innocent. I for one criticize anyone where they are wrong and many of us do. But this seems to be the new rule of law for some Pakistanis and anything based on this assumption is justified. This sir, is far, far off from how ones who hold others to moral standards, should conduct themselves. Most of all, to those who poison the minds of the people, based on assumption that they are the most moral ones.
