Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So only chinese maal news is true i guess?nope
"A HQ-9B Surface To Air Missile Unit, equipped with the new AESA HT-223 Radar and Type-780 Early Warning Radar
View attachment 155303
HQ-9B Long Range SAM, 400km range, MACH 6
AESA HT-223, fire control/Guidance radar, 300km
Type-780 Early Warning Radar, 500km"
The Navy is getting the land Camm-erSo only chinese maal news is true i guess?
I know bro...The Navy is getting the land Camm-er
i can confirm rafiqui had 100 interception rate according to my friend , although he did not know what ADs system was deployed thereOne thing I found interesting is the interception rates at Rafiqui, I'm fairly sure that was one base that was heavily targeted yet we have not seen any hits yet. I'm curious what was different at Rafique that the AD was able to achieve a seemingly higher interception rate there compared to everywhere else.
That could change though since India is on an information releasing spree and is is publishing new footage of their strikes weekly...
Spada-2000 and hq-16 most likelyi can confirm rafiqui had 100 interception rate according to my friend , although he did not know what ADs system was deployed there
is this all , any other ADs updates , i sure hope we are looking to buy and expand our ADsI know bro...
400KM range ? are u sure about the missile range or is it radar range?"A HQ-9B Surface To Air Missile Unit, equipped with the new AESA HT-223 Radar and Type-780 Early Warning Radar
View attachment 155303
HQ-9B Long Range SAM, 400km range, MACH 6
AESA HT-223, fire control/Guidance radar, 300km
Type-780 Early Warning Radar, 500km"
its upto 260 km ,400KM range ? are u sure about the missile range or is it radar range?
There is open source videos available a missile hiting the base (hit the target or not i dont know) surely it's not 100% interceptioni can confirm rafiqui had 100 interception rate according to my friend , although he did not know what ADs system was deployed there
Hitting the base which is comprised of acres of real estate isn't the right criteria. If a projectile is landing far away from facilities and equipment, it will be tracked and not neutralized. All militaries do that to preserve their munitions.There is open source videos available a missile hiting the base (hit the target or not i dont know) surely it's not 100% interception
these scumbags will find any shadow and claim it as missile strikeEither they were using firecrackers or that cruise missile went right through that hangar and Miracoulously failed to explode, I would bet on a option 3 that we looking at nothing, actually it looks like some sort hatch
260 slantits upto 260 km ,
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.