40 countries with the highest military expenditure in 2022

 
Ridiculous, Soudi Arabia is not powerful than Israel. Canada is not a military power. Iran is much powerful than above from 16th place. Why can't these people write simple facts.
Because an eff-sola costs $25 million and an Su-30 costs $30 million and an Abrams tank costs $2million and a T-90M costs the same, but evidently none of these cut the mustard today.

Defense spending is no indicator of military capability.
 

40 countries with the highest military expenditure in 2022​

Spending figures and GDP are in US dollars, at current prices and exchange rates. Changes are in real terms, based on constant (2021) US dollars. Percentages below 10 are rounded to 1 decimal place; those over 10 are rounded to whole numbers. Figures and percentage shares may not add up to stated totals or subtotals due to the conventions of rounding.

United States 877
China [292]
Russia [86.4]
India 81.4


https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/2304_fs_milex_2022.pdf


. = data not available or not applicable; [ ] = estimated figure; GDP = gross domestic product.a Rankings for 2021 are based on updated military expenditure figures in the current edition of the SIPRI Military Expenditure Database. They may therefore differ from the rankings for 2021 given in SIPRI Yearbook 2022 and in other SIPRI publications released in 2022. b The figures for military expenditure as a share of GDP are based on estimates of 2022 GDP from the International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook and International Financial Statistics databases.Sources: SIPRI Military Expenditure Database, Apr. 2023; International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, Oct. 2022; and International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics Database, Sep. 2022
.
=> THE WORLD’S LARGEST MILITARY SPENDERS IN 2022The 15 largest spenders in 2022 together accounted for 82 per cent of world military expenditure, or $1842 billion (see table 1). There were some notable changes in ranking among the top 15 between 2021 and 2022, which were largely attributable to the war in Ukraine that started in February 2022. Russia, for example, increased its spending by an estimated 9.2 per cent to move from fifth to third largest spender in the world in 2022, while Ukraine entered the top 15 for the first time (at rank 11) after a 640 per cent increase in its military expenditure. Other notable changes among the top 15 included Saudi Arabia moving from eighth to fifth largest spender, ahead of the United Kingdom, Germany and France.
The United States (accounting for 39 per cent of world military spending in 2022) and China (13 per cent) remained the two largest spenders, with Russia (3.9 per cent), India (3.6 per cent) and Saudi Arabia (3.3 per cent) completing the top five (see figure 2). Together, these five countries accounted for 63 per cent of total global military spending in 2022.Six countries in the top 15 increased their military burdens—that is, military expenditure as a share of gross domestic product (GDP)—in 2022: France, Germany, Japan, Russia, Ukraine and the UK. At 34 per cent of GDP in 2022, Ukraine’s military burden was by far the largest of any country in the world. The 30 percentage point growth in Ukraine’s military burden was the result of a sharp contraction in its economy coupled with a more than sixfold increase in its military spending.

https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/2304_fs_milex_2022.pdf

.
=>

The top 15 military spenders, 2022​

The top 15 military spenders, 2022

Military expenditure by the top 15 countries reached $1842 billion in 2022 and accounted for 82% of global military spending.

=> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures#Military_expenditure,_total

Defence Budget 2024–25: Key Highlights​


he budget estimates for the Ministry of Defence (MoD) are Rs 621,940.85 crores, Rs 400 crores more than the estimates for the MoD presented in the interim budget on 1 February 2024. The additional allocation will cater to the Acing Development of Innovative Technologies with iDEX (ADITI) scheme, launched in March 2024. While Rs 105,518.43 crore has been earmarked for procurement through domestic industries, Rs 92,088 crores has been allocated for purposes of operational readiness.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman presented the regular Union Budget on 23 July 2024. The budget estimates for the Ministry of Defence (MoD) are Rs 621,940.85 crores, Rs 400 crores more than the estimates for the MoD presented in the interim budget on 1 February 2024.1 The MoD notes that the additional allocation of Rs 400 crores is for the Acing Development of Innovative Technologies with iDEX (ADITI) scheme.2 Table 1 shows the key estimates for the Ministry of Defence.

ADITI is a sub-scheme of Innovation for Defence Excellence (iDEX) under the Department of Defence Production (DDP), MoD with a budget of Rs750 crores till 2026. The iDEX initiative itself was launched in April 2018, to provide financial support to start-ups, Medium, Small and Micro Enterprises (MSMEs) as well as individual innovators under the Defence Innovation Organisation (DIO) framework. The MoD signed the 350th contract with a defence start-up in June 2024. Since inception in 2018, the iDEX 11 editions of the Defence India Start-up Challenge (DISC) have been conducted and the MoD is in the process of procuring equipment selected through these challenges to the tune of Rs 2,000 crores.3

A significant new initiative that was announced by Finance Minister Sitharaman in the interim budget presented on 1 February 2024 related to the decision to launch a new scheme to provide long-term financing to the private sector for research and innovation in sunrise sectors with a corpus of Rs 100,000 crore. She had also announced that another scheme will be launched for strengthening ‘deep-tech’ technologies for defence purposes. The ADITI scheme was subsequently launched on 4 March 2024 to encourage innovations in ‘critical and strategic defence technologies’.4 These technologies were flagged as those related to satellite communication applications, advanced cyber technology, autonomous weapons, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Quantum Technologies (QT), among others.5

The long-term corpus of Rs 100,000 crore is reflective of the recognition that defence innovation will play a big role in optimally fulfilling the modernisation requirements of the armed forces. Current schemes like the Technology Development Fund (TDF) and iDEX which involve start-ups, academia and MSMEs have, therefore, become important enablers for tackling niche technological requirements of the armed forces.

Even as the private sector’s role in defence research and development (R&D) is poised for a big leap, the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) will continue to play a leading role in so far as defence R&D is concerned. The DRDO’s budget estimates for 2024–25 in the regular budget stand at Rs 23,855 crores, which is less than 4 per cent of the total defence budget. The government had recently constituted a High-Powered Committee to look into the functioning of the DRDO. The Committee has submitted its recommendations with reports in January 2024 noting that it has suggested further streamlining the work and structure of the premier R&D organisation in the service of the nation.

Adequate and optimum financial resources coupled with advances made as a result of defence R&D and innovation are expected to aid the defence indigenisation efforts of the MoD. This aspect is a critical component of the MoD’s efforts towards Atmanirbharta or self-reliance, given the fact that India cannot be self-reliant while continuing to depend on imports for addressing the weapons and equipment needs of the armed forces.

The armed forces are increasingly procuring equipment from the domestic defence industry. In 2020–21, the government specifically bifurcated the capital procurement budget for the armed forces between foreign and domestic procurement, allocating 40 per cent of the budget for domestic procurement. In 2023–24, this rose to 75 per cent of the capital procurement budget. It is significant to note that the Army, Navy and the Air Force spent more on domestic procurement during 2020–22 than what was budgeted for. During these years, the capital outlay for domestic procurement was Rs 130,000 crores while the three services procured more than Rs 150,000 crores from the domestic defence industry.6 The MoD notes that in the regular BE for 2024–25, Rs 105,518.43 crore or ‘75 per cent of the modernisation budget’ has been earmarked for procurement through domestic industries.7

The government has also allocated Rs 92,088 crores for purposes of operational readiness, 48 per cent higher than the actual allocations in 2022–23. The MoD notes that this is to ensure that the Indian Armed forces are ‘battle ready at all times’. The MoD further notes that these funds are to:

provide best maintenance facilities and support system to all platforms including aircraft and ships. It will facilitate procurement of ammunition; mobility of resources & personnel as demanded by the security situation, and strengthen the deployment in forward areas for any unforeseen situation.8
India’s defence budget for 2024–25 at Rs 621,940.85 crores is an increase of 4.78 per cent over the budget estimates (BE) for 2023–24. In the 2023–24 budget estimates, the defence budget was Rs 593,537 crores, which was less than 2 per cent of the GDP. The parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence (SCOD) has suggested in the recent past that the country’s defence budget should be at least 3 per cent of the gross domestic product (GDP) to ensure effective modernisation of the armed forces. While the MoD has maintained that funds allocated to the Ministry are commensurate with the requirements of the armed forces, the financial resources required for the modernisation of the armed forces requirements are indeed huge.

The SCOD in 2018 had, for instance, suggested that the Army equipment profile should ideally be 30 per cent of new equipment, 40 per cent current equipment and 30 per cent older generation equipment. The Army informed the SCOD in March 2023, five years later, that only 15 per cent of the Army’s equipment can be categorised as new equipment, while nearly 45 per cent continued to be older equipment. The Army representative informed the parliamentary committee that ‘there is some time to go before we reach the ideal state of 30:40:30’.9

The Army’s modernisation budget though has seen an average annual increase of 13.6 per cent during 2013–23, while the Navy and Air Force saw an increase of 11 per cent and 4 per cent respectively. No doubt, the Air Force accounted for the bulk of the modernisation budget allocations during this time period, at more than Rs 385,220 crores, as against Rs 273,460 crores for the Navy and Rs 201,716 crores for the Army.10

The modernisation budget is part of the Capital Outlay on Defence Services. The capital outlay budget for the armed forces has seen a cumulative annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.8 per cent since 2014–15, while the Defence Services Estimate (DSE) (Revenue) budget has seen a CAGR of 7.9 per cent. The capital outlay expenditure, therefore, has seen a greater growth than revenue expenditure during this time period.

The larger chunk of the defence budget, however, goes towards meeting the revenue expenditure of the Ministry of Defence. In 2024–25 budget estimates, for instance, over 45 per cent of the total MoD budget is for DSE Revenue while about 28 per cent are the allocations for the Capital Outlay. Around 23 per cent goes towards Defence pensions, while the remaining allocations are for Demand No. 19, MoD (Civil) which encompasses revenue and capital establishment expenditure of the MoD (see Table 1).

The capital outlay on defence services in BE 2024–25 stands at Rs 172,000 crores. As in the February 2024 Interim Budget, consolidated capital demands of the three services are provided rather than being delineated for each Service. The MoD in February 2024 had noted that this was a ‘conscious call to foster jointness among the services by consolidating the demand of the three services’. It further noted that it will bring

flexibility in financial management by enabling the MoD to re-appropriate the fund among the three services keeping in view the inter services priority. This mechanism will also expedite decision making and ensure better utilisation of the capital budget.11
The consolidation of the capital outlay budget heads is, therefore, part of the broader defence reforms to make the budget process better tuned to meet the long-term planning and futuristic requirements of the armed forces as a whole. Such an integrated approach to budget planning could lead to better optimisation of financial resources. It needs to be pointed out though that lack of segregated data in the public domain on capital allocations to the three services will constrain independent analysis of the modernisation trajectory of India’s armed forces due to non-disclosure of granular details of capital expenditure in the defence budget.

Border road infrastructure development and adequately equipping the Coast Guard meanwhile continue to be key focus areas of the government. In the regular budget for 2024–25, Rs 6,500 crores has been allocated to the Border Roads Development Board, which is 30 per cent higher than BE 2023–24. The Coast Guard’s budget has seen a CAGR of nearly 10 per cent since 2015. BE 2024–25 allocations to the Coast Guard stand at Rs 7,651.8 crores.

Figure


As regard the budget estimates for the Agnipath scheme, in 2024–25, Rs 5,979 crores have been allocated, with the Army accounting for 87 per cent of the allocations. Graph 1 shows the Agnipath allocations as a percentage of Pay and Allowances of the three Services since 2022–23.

Conclusion​

India’s defence modernisation challenges are huge. Adequate financial resources, defence indigenisation and defence innovation hold the key to build modern and agile fighting forces at the forefront of defending the country’s territorial integrity and sovereignty. Going forward, as the Indian domestic defence industry masters the defence R&D and innovation challenge, as Indian armed forces continue to procure more from the domestic industry (y) , and optimum financial resources continue to be allocated to the armed forces, the armed forces capability gaps will no doubt be bridged faster with less dependence on foreign sources.

Views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Manohar Parrikar IDSA or of the Government of India.

 
.
a comparison between Mirage2000-5 Vs LCA mk1, as below:

it was said that Mirage2000H was having preference for Nuclear Attack from Indian side, if needed, at least till the last century.....

but now we find the ordered LCA mk1 is very useful on border operation, if the operation is done within Indian territory. as, if you have to cross border and conduct operation in China's and Pakistan's territories, then India has SU30mki 'stealth' only. we find the Rafale is not reliable, fail to win confidence that it can successful cross the border of Neighbors and conducts successful Air to Ground attack, if needed. here, if we consider that the pilot who won't back so easily, :( , after operations on other's land, then the Rafale is found to be having better Air to Ground capabilities than any of Indian Combat Aircrafts like SU30mki 'stealth'......
even Mig35 in MRCA tender was having better Air to Air capabilities as compared to J10 and F16, at least having some better 'point tests' than Rafale to survive in air and cross the international border to reach the expected targets of rival's land to conduct Air to Ground operations on rival's territories......

Rafale and LCAs are mostly expected to be kept within Indian territory this way, ..... the Mirage2000H was having some reliability to successfully cross the international border for Air to Ground operation outside Indian border, as, those times was in favour of Mirage2000h, as the time has changed now, the rivals of India are no having better defence equipment now......

here as below, the LCA mk1 is compared with Mirage2000h :coffee:

.
=> https://www.financialexpress.com/business/defence-hal-set-to-receive-another-lca-order-despite-delivery-challenges-3583504/#:~:text=HAL has assured the IAF,83 aircraft by 2028-29.&text=Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) is,(LCA Mk-1A).

HAL has assured the IAF that it will deliver 16 LCA Mk-1As in the fiscal year 2024-25 and complete the delivery of all 83 aircraft by 2028-29.
 
Last edited:
Because an eff-sola costs $25 million and an Su-30 costs $30 million and an Abrams tank costs $2million and a T-90M costs the same, but evidently none of these cut the mustard today.

Defense spending is no indicator of military capability.

how we see Capital Expenditure of India as compared to other countries?
i would say, India would less spend for aircraft, say Rafale i dont like......
 
how we see Capital Expenditure of India as compared to other countries?
i would say, India would less spend for aircraft, say Rafale i dont like......
Yous haven’t reached a level to actually assert yourself yet.

When you reach that milestone, lots of issues will automatically get addressed.

Currently your military capability is sub par.

Like I put the question in front of Mr Saanddhu here that if you were to be asked hypothetically to strike Israel or the EU or China……..you can’t do it. You don’t have any conventional capabilities.
 
Because an eff-sola costs $25 million and an Su-30 costs $30 million and an Abrams tank costs $2million and a T-90M costs the same, but evidently none of these cut the mustard today.

Defense spending is no indicator of military capability.
Yous haven’t reached a level to actually assert yourself yet.

When you reach that milestone, lots of issues will automatically get addressed.

Currently your military capability is sub par.

Like I put the question in front of Mr Saanddhu here that if you were to be asked hypothetically to strike Israel or the EU or China……..you can’t do it. You don’t have any conventional capabilities.

how you people see Military Strength Ranking for 2024 by GFP, as below?
i would say, Pakistan would be placed above Turkey in this ranking.......
 
most countries focus on defending their homeland. it is a lot cheaper than projecting force across continents like what USA does
 
how you people see Military Strength Ranking for 2024 by GFP, as below?
i would say, Pakistan would be placed above Turkey in this ranking.......
Oh bhai, don't you get it? You are buying junk from the West now instead of Russia. Problem is it is still junk!

Al-Rafale or Su-30 or T-90 or Nhilghiri frigate or Neer-bhayya mayzile are not your creations.

You just wasting money on junk which won't work when war comes.
 
most countries focus on defending their homeland. it is a lot cheaper than projecting force across continents like what USA does

its true. fighting war on other's land as compared to defend our own homeland has difference...
 
China only started entering reusable spacecraft while the US has been doing for a longer time. There are things that China is already ahead on. Just because something is resemble doesn't mean it's the same lmao The fact they now have a reusable spacecraft just by itself shows how far they have come (and) the fact it was up for so long, and returned safely,” said Brendan Mulvaney, director of the China Aerospace Studies Institute, a US Air Force think tank, noting the Chinese claim of mission success earlier this month.

“All of that means they are putting in the time, effort, and investments, to make it work. China is the undisputed No. 2 space power and is aiming to close the gap with the US in military, commercial, and scientific realms, all at the same time,” he said.

USA is the Saturated Power. its doesn't have future like CHina.......
i would say CHina has already outperformed USA in most of the areas of Defence :coffee:
 
one dollar in china military produce more things than one dollar in USA.

half USA military budget must go straight to the bank accounts of owners of industrial-military complex, producing nothing but keep alive a parasite ruling elite.

I dout the data's of US's military also......
AMerican economy is too poor for these military expenditure data's :)
 
India Turns the Page on Ties with Russia After Ukraine War

When India’s External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar went to Moscow last week, he appeared to turn the page in India-Russia ties after two years of tightrope walking.

For the better part of the last two years, even as it had maintained neutrality on Ukraine and rapidly expanded trade with Russia, India had been wary of any perceptions of alignment with an isolated Moscow. There had been a pause in the annual bilateral meetings between India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Russia’s President Vladimir Putin. India had chosen to hold the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit virtually last year rather than hosting Putin in New Delhi. It had also conveniently escaped hosting Putin at the G-20 Leaders’ Summit.

Throughout that period, India had continued to import oil and coal from Russia in unprecedented quantities, but New Delhi did so under the perception — deliberate or otherwise — that it had few strategic alternatives to trade with Moscow. There were seldom glowing references to Russia as an Indian ally, and Modi had even publicly lectured Putin about avoiding war.

But the world has since changed. As Israel has waged an appalling war in Gaza, the tables have turned, and U.S. support for the Israeli government in that war has diluted Washington’s moral high ground. Last month, the U.N. General Assembly voted overwhelmingly in favor of an “immediate humanitarian ceasefire” in Gaza. Only 10 countries, including Israel and the United States, voted against it. In the U.N. Security Council, the U.S. had to resort to a veto to kill a near-unanimous resolution.

Washington’s isolation over Gaza coincided with more bombastic rhetoric from New Delhi. After copping criticism from Western observers for meeting with Putin last week, Jaishankar said, “Please look in the mirror and tell me how you were behaving as a democracy.”

The agenda for bilateral talks between India and Russia has also expanded. When Jaishankar went to Moscow in 2022, there was heavy focus on oil trade, as India rushed to take advantage of discounted Russian crude.

This time, there was much more. In talks with Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Jaishankar discussed “the state of multilateralism and the building of a multipolar world order.” Ahead of the meeting, Lavrov said the two countries are interested in “building an international political and economic system that would be open and fair for everyone.”

Progress was also made on other important fronts. The Ukraine war appeared to have derailed military ties between the two countries; in 2022, Russia was buying back arms from India amid losses in Ukraine and crippling sanctions. That had added to larger concerns in New Delhi about Russia’s reliability as a supplier. But Moscow is now making an effort to revive military ties. Last week, Lavrov announced that he had made significant progress with Jaishankar on plans to jointly produce military equipment.

For New Delhi, this could be a major fillip. In the quest to indigenize its defense supplies, India has long hoped for joint development partnerships — in particular with the United States. But progress has been hampered over the years for sundry reasons, including regulatory barriers and industry concerns in the U.S. If India and Russia now begin to jointly develop military technology, that may only make the U.S. more wary; Washington may fear potentially losing trade secrets and technical know-how to Russia via India.

Under the circumstances, India may be tempted to choose Russia over the United States. Ties with Washington have soured in recent months after the U.S. alleged that an Indian government official had directed a murder plot in New York. U.S. President Joe Biden subsequently turned down an invitation to travel to New Delhi for India’s Republic Day parade later this month.

With Russia, on the other hand, there are few causes for irritation. As Jaishankar put it this week, “[Russia] is a relationship that [has] served India well.”

That statement of resounding endorsement would have been more uncomfortable only a year ago, with global public opinion squarely focused on casualties in Ukraine and the moral case against Russia’s unilateral invasion. But with Washington now implicated in a gruesome conflict of its own in the Middle East, India and Russia have recovered more strategic space.

we find India-Russia-Iran combined power increased consistently since 1990. India-Russia combined are "self-sufficient" with themselves for a wide range of Industries since Cold War time.
Delhi-Moscow-Tehran dont have to trade with US-NATO...... :coffee:
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top