AJK govt bans Joint Awami Action Committee, notification issued

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

allow bbc to report freely then if they have no viewership and you have nothing to hide.

With the past history of the bbc, can you HONESTLY believe them when they say they are not allowed to report freely? If they are reporting freely then how can you be sure that they will report accurately and fairly when you consider the HUGE number of lies they have historically told going back many decades.

The bbc is a pro-zionist and pro-hindutva media organisation. Can they be trusted to have unbiased reporting with regards to Pakistan?

 

[Distant_Observer]

With the past history of the bbc, can you HONESTLY believe them when they say they are not allowed to report freely? If they are reporting freely then how can you be sure that they will report accurately and fairly when you consider the HUGE number of lies they have historically told going back many decades.

The bbc is a pro-zionist and pro-hindutva media organisation. Can they be trusted to have unbiased reporting with regards to Pakistan?

Who remembers the BBC interrogating the Pakistani ambassador after India's attack in which many Pakistani civilians died with no remorse?

F**k them. Ban BBC, ban AJ, ban them all. AJ took the piss, when was the last time Qatar held elections? Who are you to point fingers, don't interefere in our democratic process.

We don't need their selective yellow journalism.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Who remembers the BBC interrogating the Pakistani ambassador after India's attack in which many Pakistani civilians died with no remorse?

F**k them. Ban BBC, ban AJ, ban them all. AJ took the piss, when was the last time Qatar held elections? Who are you to point fingers, don't interefere in our democratic process.

We don't need their selective yellow journalism.

To add, the 1.3 million dead Iraqis due to the american/nato invasion of Iraq in March 2003. The lies and propaganda the bbc peddled was used to justify this genocide of the Iraqis which was EVEN WORST than the current Gaza genocide of the Palestinians. NO-ONE was EVER held accountable or responsible for this. It's so obvious how Islamaphobic, anti-Pakistani and anti-Muslim the bbc are and have always been. What is shocking however is the number of Pakistanis/Muslims that still trust the bbc as an honest, valid, serious and trustworthy news source.

PS As a rule of thumb, whenever someone belonging to a race or community that is racist, colonialist and is traditionally anti-Pakistani/anti-Muslim says ANYTHING about Pakistanis, Muslims, Islam, Muslim countries and issues affecting Muslims, SWITCH OFF and IGNORE them. Because it is highly likely what they say or believe is biased, racist and extreme propaganda. NEVER EVER listen to these hypocrites about what they say about morality, humanity and being a good person. These hypocrites CAN NEVER be trusted or believed.

 

[Goenitz]

With the past history of the bbc, can you HONESTLY believe them when they say they are not allowed to report freely? If they are reporting freely then how can you be sure that they will report accurately and fairly when you consider the HUGE number of lies they have historically told going back many decades.

The bbc is a pro-zionist and pro-hindutva media organisation. Can they be trusted to have unbiased reporting with regards to Pakistan?

We all know all media outlets are pro-govt or some party.
Not only that, the media blacked out the Gaza genocide initially, or printed ambiguous and misleading headlines. The way they reported on Megan vs Kate's pregnancy also showed their bias. You can also include Ukr vs Russia or Iran vs US reporting.

Therefore, if the media is publishing these things, it means there is pressure from British MPs and the government to report that. Otherwise, they tried their best to hide the 2024 election report.

Lastly, the BBC essentially has no incentive to be pro or anti-Islamabad as such, and sometimes they report impartially to remain in journalism. Also, it is a domestic issue and not Pak vs India. Hence, I think it can be considered objective reporting. One can counter it with facts, but banning it makes them credible for this situation.