Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL, I have seen the usual ancient aliens and amazing technology videos. They are all crap, always exaggerated or outright false, and always explained by modern science.
It's entertaining
How do we explain this
![]()
Stonehenge: Central Altar Stone from Scotland not Wales
Stonehenge's famous Altar Stone came from Scotland not Wales as previously thought, new analysis shows.www.bbc.com
You are hunter gatherer, why bother? Why the specificity?
I am not proposing ancient et, just normal questions to ponder
I don't think Stonehenge people were hunter gatherers: they had a well developed society with cities, religion, and political structure.
Almost every advanced culture of ancient times had an obsession with large stone structures, probably because they symbolized permanence and, therefore, power.
We haven't travelled far: we build skyscrapers to show off our wealth and power.
There always seems to be two camps, one that dismissively thinks it's pre modern grunts putting stones on top of each other, the other camp imagining something more incredible
Sky scrapers serve a notional function and they don't come at the sort of human endeavour that these old buildings did
We cannot superimpose modern thinking and motives to thousands of years back, it won't do.
Why go to this considerable effort,risk and cost to do anything other than survive
Once again, these were not hunter gatherers scraping by to 'survive' the day. These were all advanced societies with access to massive resources. The megalithic structures they left behind were a civilizational statement about their wealth and power.
The skyscrapers of today serve the same purpose. Nobody 'needs' to build taller and taller skyscrapers. They are a statement of wealth and prestige.
The ancients did it using human labor, we do it using machines. Other than that, they have the same motivation.
When you said massive resources what does that mean?
Were they able to create surplus in their societies? what technology did they use that enabled surplus of food and labour? I am thinking of stone henge here
A skyscraper is nothing like a civilizational statement in the way these structures were
, to say these structures are just to show wealth and power is entirely inadequate, that's just bringing modern thinking to ancient times, contradiction by default
It means they were not scrounging for food from day to day as you seem to think.
I don't know the specifics of Stonehenge but the other megaliths in Africa, South America and Asia were built by advanced societies who had plenty of surplus. They had cities, armies, and specialized, well trained professionals in all sorts of trades. They forecasted their consumption cycles, and planned their production cycles.
They were modern in every sense of the word. Except for their level of technology, they were not very different from us.
By 'skyscrapers' I am talking about people chasing the tallest building race. Nobody cares about ordinary tall buildings because they are a dime a dozen.
You see a contradiction because you refuse to accept the sociological connection across the ages. The connection is human nature: it doesn't change.
In the old days, they used royal decree or religion to amass the necessary resources, today we use economics, but the underlying motivation behind all of them is a show of prestige and power.


In fact, the ancient Egyptian civilization is 39 thousand years old!!
Ok, what is the mysterious phrase that the priests of Heliopolis said to Herodotus that he could not explain?
The historian Herodotus quoted from the priests of Heliopolis a strange incident that they told him about, and he recorded it in his book without fully understanding it.
View attachment 76169
They told him: “The sun rose twice from where it sets now, and set twice from where it rises now.”
A French mathematician named Schuyler de Laubitz had a very convincing opinion on this issue
This movement only occurs every 13 thousand years, meaning that in order for it to occur twice, this exchange still occurred twice in 39 thousand years.
If Schuyler’s hypothesis is correct, this means that the Heliopolis scholars were relying on records that dates back to at least 39 thousand years BC
This is what was called (Zeb Tepe), or "The first time"
The phrase (the sun rose twice from where it sets now, and set twice from where it rises now) does not come true unless the civilization is 39 thousand years old.
It agrees with the antiquity of Egyptian civilization, which historians recorded, quoting Manuton
View attachment 76171
This is not strange, Egyptian scientists discovered a cemetery in Fayoum containing pottery tools that they estimated to be 32,000 years old..








We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.