Khansaheeb
Elite Member
- Thread starter
- #61
Israelis must have killed her durig a botched rescueShe was killed, do you think it's not terrorism?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Israelis must have killed her durig a botched rescueShe was killed, do you think it's not terrorism?
They make ethics, morality , rules, standards , interpretation of laws unashamedly on the fly.It's never that simple.
The West and Israel deliberately target a group of people knowing it will kill civilians, but they have a scale of how many civilians are expendable depending on the value of the militant killed.
The US takes it even one step further and targets anyone they claim is proving financial support to terrorists. By this crazy logic, Wall Street is a legitimate target for the other side because it finances the US military.
Bottom line, the definitions and laws are written by those who have the military muscle to enforce their definitions.
Nazi genocide supporters need to go back to Germany or India. The Nazi disease was dormant but has flared up again.I have a simple suggestion - leave the West and settle in Russia's/China's of the world
I have a simple suggestion - leave the West and settle in Russia's/China's of the world
When a group targets civilians deliberately is terrorism without doubt.
When in a military operation collateral damage can be foreseen as high, it's when it's hard to judge.
The west is being held hostage by 6 million Jews in the USA.
It is better we stay and fight this cancer.
Now what part of what I said is incorrect?
Most of the world does not consider October 7th to be terrorism and both Russia and China did not condemn it.
Said the retard living in the USA.I have a simple suggestion - leave the West and settle in Russia's/China's of the world
It's hard to judge if collateral damage is terrorism or not.'Collateral damage' is used to instil terror in the other side's civilians. It is deliberate and calculated to be large enough to terrorize the civilians, but small enough to be shrugged off as 'unintentional', 'unavoidable', etc..
She was captured by Palestinians, do you call that military operation? it's not terrorism capture a civilian unrelated to fight?Israelis must have killed her durig a botched rescue
Personal opinion:We don’t have any defined policy on Gaza issue. Maybe moderators should internally discuss this matter and follow the policy.
I personally believe that we should stick with the terminology used in the media to keep things as simple as possible. I also believe that no doubt Israel is doing Genocide and probably planning Greater Israel by killing innocent children and women in neighbouring countries but Hamas is not a saint either.
What Hamas did on the 7th of October last year was a terrorist attack and should have been treated as such.
99% were IDF on and off duty. The rest were killed by IDF themselves as they went in with tanks and choppers.It's hard to judge if collateral damage is terrorism or not.
But if a group exhibit proudly civilians killed, injured and captured, there is no doubt that it's terrorism.
You should tell that to the OIC, then about Hamas and Hezbollah.The Gaza genocide has shown who the real evil genociding terrorists are . I propose to the Admins that anyone who calls Hamas , Hizbollah etc terrorists should be banned. Slandering freedom fighters shouldn't be acceptable and by implication those who use such terms are condoning the mass murder and starvation of hapless civilians. I would have started a poll if I knew how, couldn't find the option. Click like if you agree!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.