Anyone who calls Palestinians or their armed resistors terrorists Should be banned

It's never that simple.

The West and Israel deliberately target a group of people knowing it will kill civilians, but they have a scale of how many civilians are expendable depending on the value of the militant killed.

The US takes it even one step further and targets anyone they claim is proving financial support to terrorists. By this crazy logic, Wall Street is a legitimate target for the other side because it finances the US military.

Bottom line, the definitions and laws are written by those who have the military muscle to enforce their definitions.
They make ethics, morality , rules, standards , interpretation of laws unashamedly on the fly.
 
Last edited:
I have a simple suggestion - leave the West and settle in Russia's/China's of the world


The west is being held hostage by 6 million Jews in the USA.

It is better we stay and fight this cancer.

Now what part of what I said is incorrect?
 
When a group targets civilians deliberately is terrorism without doubt.

When in a military operation collateral damage can be foreseen as high, it's when it's hard to judge.

'Collateral damage' is used to instil terror in the other side's civilians. It is deliberate and calculated to be large enough to terrorize the civilians, but small enough to be shrugged off as 'unintentional', 'unavoidable', etc..
 
The west is being held hostage by 6 million Jews in the USA.

It is better we stay and fight this cancer.

Now what part of what I said is incorrect?

This was your quote
Most of the world does not consider October 7th to be terrorism and both Russia and China did not condemn it.

I will let you figure out what is correct and incorrect
 
I have a simple suggestion - leave the West and settle in Russia's/China's of the world
Said the retard living in the USA.

Why do Indians like you blindly forget why there is an existence of a resistance force? There is an illegal occupier - raping killing and committing genocide. Naturally there is a resistance to this - then this is propagated as terror. If they got out of their country and land - there would be no need for Hamas.
The affair didn’t start on 7th Oct - this day was the eventuality of suppression and illegal octivities by Israel.
Today Israel is attacking the UN forces in Lebanon. This is beyond terror this is a war crime. Indians like you want to show white man you are more whiter than they are by aiding and hiding the real facts
 
'Collateral damage' is used to instil terror in the other side's civilians. It is deliberate and calculated to be large enough to terrorize the civilians, but small enough to be shrugged off as 'unintentional', 'unavoidable', etc..
It's hard to judge if collateral damage is terrorism or not.

But if a group exhibit proudly civilians killed, injured and captured, there is no doubt that it's terrorism.
 
Israelis must have killed her durig a botched rescue
She was captured by Palestinians, do you call that military operation? it's not terrorism capture a civilian unrelated to fight?
 
We don’t have any defined policy on Gaza issue. Maybe moderators should internally discuss this matter and follow the policy.

I personally believe that we should stick with the terminology used in the media to keep things as simple as possible. I also believe that no doubt Israel is doing Genocide and probably planning Greater Israel by killing innocent children and women in neighbouring countries but Hamas is not a saint either.

What Hamas did on the 7th of October last year was a terrorist attack and should have been treated as such.
Personal opinion:
The criteria for a rational public forum based on this issue should be based on basic human norms.
War is one of the basic activities of mankind. War between soldiers, no matter how brutal it is, we have to accept the reality that it is real. The reality of war is that civilians cannot avoid the impression that war brings. We have to accept the reality that “a large number of civilians die as a result of war”.
But we cannot accept the wanton slaughter of civilians, let alone the wanton slaughter of vulnerable groups such as the elderly, children and women. Those who give such orders and carry them out should not be regarded as human beings. Still less can we accept those who use their own civilians as a shield.
This has no relevance to human organizations such as countries, nations, religions, organizations, armies and so on. We criticize the “non-humans” who give such orders and carry them out. It is only when the proportion of such “non-humans” in the organization exceeds an unacceptable level that we can consider the organization as “non-human”.
Since it is already considered “non-human”, we do not have to treat it by human rules.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Lol for terrorist nations , everyone stand against them are terrorist!
 
Americans here love Israel and even start threads celebrating death of martry leaders. They should definitely be banned
 
It's hard to judge if collateral damage is terrorism or not.

But if a group exhibit proudly civilians killed, injured and captured, there is no doubt that it's terrorism.
99% were IDF on and off duty. The rest were killed by IDF themselves as they went in with tanks and choppers.
 
The Gaza genocide has shown who the real evil genociding terrorists are . I propose to the Admins that anyone who calls Hamas , Hizbollah etc terrorists should be banned. Slandering freedom fighters shouldn't be acceptable and by implication those who use such terms are condoning the mass murder and starvation of hapless civilians. I would have started a poll if I knew how, couldn't find the option. Click like if you agree!
You should tell that to the OIC, then about Hamas and Hezbollah.

What the OIC should designate Hamas and Hezbollah.

Same with the United Nations and SCO and BRICS.

Agreed, Israel is doing genocide.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top