Armament of the Russian Army

RU POV: GoPro Footage: Rosgvardiya Mobile Fire Group Engages Enemy UAV with Interceptor Drones of the "Yolka" type on the border region.​


 
you're comparing apple to oranges again Mr., Excalibur is guided by satellites (GPS)+ intertrial navigation system whereas Russian shell is guided by laser, which means laser designator is needed by third party ( either from foot soldier or from other aircraft)

Laser is more reliable and more accurate than GPS. GPS can be jammed or spoofed. In fact, Krasnopol has been proven effective in Donbas war.
 
Laser is more reliable and more accurate than GPS. GPS can be jammed or spoofed. In fact, Krasnopol has been proven effective in Donbas war.
without designator in the target aera for target illumination laser guided shell has way worst accuracy than satellite navigation (GPS)+ inertial navigation, and please do explain me why Russian forces can't be able to jammed or spoofed Excalibur used by Ukrainian forces against Russian forces?

Its the fact you troll that military grade GPS signals are much much more difficult to be jammed or spoofed than civilian grade GPS signals, and do research before barking nonsense and crap lol
 
@NGAD IS THE BEST

HIMARS obsolete compared to cheap toy drone.

RU POV: Rubicon FPV drone detection and strike on a Himars MLRS In the area of Novobakhmetyevo, Ukriane - The Wrong Side​


 
without designator in the target aera for target illumination laser guided shell has way worst accuracy than satellite navigation (GPS)+ inertial navigation, and please do explain me why Russian forces can't be able to jammed or spoofed Excalibur used by Ukrainian forces against Russian forces?

Its the fact you troll that military grade GPS signals are much much more difficult to be jammed or spoofed than civilian grade GPS signals, and do research before barking nonsense and crap lol

Laser guidance is better in urban combat. Laser designators are easily hidden in buildings. If urban combat you need better accuracy to avoid friendly fire and you also don't want your shells spoofed by EW and hitting your own men.
 
Last edited:
Laser guidance is better in urban combat. Laser designators are easily hidden in buildings. If urban combat you need better accuracy to avoid friendly fire and you also don't want your shells spoofed by EW and hitting your own men.
Laser guidance is only good when your enemy is extremely weak and don't have countermeasures against laser guided munitions/shells like Ukraine
 
@NGAD IS THE BEST

HIMARS obsolete compared to cheap toy drone.

RU POV: Rubicon FPV drone detection and strike on a Himars MLRS In the area of Novobakhmetyevo, Ukriane - The Wrong Side​



Few mean nothing and can I show you Russian version of HIMARS destroyed by Ukrainian drones?
 
Last edited:
@NGAD IS THE BEST

HIMARS obsolete compared to cheap toy drone.

RU POV: Rubicon FPV drone detection and strike on a Himars MLRS In the area of Novobakhmetyevo, Ukriane - The Wrong Side​



So Russian MRLSs are also obsolete, Because Ukrainian drones and long range artillery have destroyed 1600+ Russian MRLSs in the battlefield





 

RU POV: Report on combat operations of the "Strela-10" anti-aircraft missile system from WEST Group 25th Army in the Krasny Liman direction.​


 

RU POV: CENTER Group combat operations of the anti-aircraft missile system crews from the "Invincible" Brigade engaging enemy drones with MANPADS.​


 
@NGAD IS THE BEST

Javelin not as useful as Lancet. Javelin range limited to 2 km because the target must be sighted with EO before shooting. Lancet can fly 40 km before locking on using AI.

RU POV: Lancet strike on UAF T-64 in Borovaya, Kharkov region​


 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top