Azad Jammu Kashmir elections 2026

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Pakistan's alleged biggest and most popular party is demanding intervention in Azad and Jammu Kashmir by the United Nations.

This may be general evidence that pti maybe funded by india and is their proxy.

 

[flyingorca]

tell Asim Munir to declare theocracy first.

So its justified only if the ruling system is changed?

 

[HAIDER]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Here's your official PTI page. PTI always does shitty antics like this to generate pressure.

Phir tum jaisay gandu boltay hai obsessed with PTI.

Well, this is correct term under UN resolution on Kashmir, read the document. Both part of Kashmir addressed as Indian and Pakistani administrated Kashmir . It means this is disputed territory and need plebiscite under UN resolution.

 

[flyingorca]

It's actually textbook color revolution tactics.

They didn't have social media back in the day, 3rd world ethnocentric minded people are perfect fodder for the algorithms.

Pakistan as an entity, a nation is incredibly resilient. No other country would have survived this onslaught. They have thrown everything at them since the nuclear tests.

What? as per western sources where majority of PTI politicians and influencers reside, 50k Iranian protesters were killed.
Btw if dashadgardi is a toll of the fauij which PTI has been propagating explain why this method was never used against PTI protests?

 

[samsite84]

very sad, over all death toll pass 60 , massive protest around the world by Kashmiri people. its heart breaking .....

On top of it, Faujduds and Patwaris are rampant on this thread. I think these establishment turds have done more damage to Pakistan (only next to establishment). They are a bigoted bunch who will bring "Yindus", talk about martial supremacy and "pride" in their ethnicity while putting anti-national labels on anyone who disagrees. All this while, Fauj hasn't even achieved a single worthwhile victory vs. India on one side and Afg on the other.

Frankly, there is a small class of same people on other side of the border but still some semblance of democracy and rule of law remains. People might protect govt. and be hostile in talks, but they never support govt. picking weapons against citizenery (e.g., Delhi protests, farmer protests etc.)

 

[Areesh]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Bilawal gone mad after losing elections in AJK, sore loser.

Establishment can delay it but sooner or later this ppp would go full on with sindhudesh agenda when its political interests would be in danger inevitably

Pti would be sindhi at that time after becoming baloch, afghan and kashmiri

 

[Areesh]

I wonder what is PTI's stance on Iranian crack down on "peaceful" protesters few months ago.

That was halal crackdown

 

[Areesh]

Well, this is correct term under UN resolution on Kashmir, read the document. Both part of Kashmir addressed as Indian and Pakistani administrated Kashmir . It means this is disputed territory and need plebiscite under UN resolution.

So pti read UN resolution just today?

 

[samsite84]

So pti read UN resolution just today?

Go find 10-15 more strawman arguments and don't talk about the substantive issue: the excesses of Pakistan state on common man in AJK. This is classic diversionary tactics...

What Pakistan establishment is doing in AJK is indefensible - no two ways about it. And instead of a functional, peaceful state of affairs, AJK is tethering on brink of a civil war

 

[flyingorca]

Well, this is correct term under UN resolution on Kashmir, read the document. Both part of Kashmir addressed as Indian and Pakistani administrated Kashmir . It means this is disputed territory and need plebiscite under UN resolution.

In that case Kashmir is subjected to higher taxation due to protection it gets from government of Pakistan. Unless Kashmir wants to be controlled by India because their aint no way independent Kashmir can survive specially when not just GOI but every other Indian wants AJK under India's control. I honestly do not get why Kashmir rights should supersede rest of Pakistan. Their protest is merely political driven.

 

[samsite84]

In that case Kashmir is subjected to higher taxation due to protection it gets from government of Pakistan. Unless Kashmir wants to be controlled by India because their aint no way independent Kashmir can survive specially when not just GOI but every other Indian wants AJK under India's control. I honestly do not get why Kashmir rights should supersede rest of Pakistan. Their protest is merely political driven.

Speak for yourself, let AJK decide what happens after you vacate their lands

 

[Areesh]

Go find 10-15 more strawman arguments and don't talk about the substantive issue: the excesses of Pakistan state on common man in AJK. This is classic diversionary tactics...

What Pakistan establishment is doing in AJK is indefensible - no two ways about it. And instead of a functional, peaceful state of affairs, AJK is tethering on brink of a civil war

So raising pti's immature behavior that is being exploited by indians means diversionary tactics

Okay

 

[samsite84]

So raising pti's immature behavior that is being exploited by indians means diversionary tactics

Okay

100%. We have arguments like this in India as well. You qeustion BJP and bhakts start to bring congress in. BJP is in power, Pak establishment is in power so questions must be asked from them. Bringing PTI in, when don't hold no power is diversionary

 

[flyingorca]

Speak for yourself, let AJK decide what happens after you vacate their lands

Half of their population already ran away to Lundon, pretty sure the other half can peacefully settle their.

 

[Areesh]

100%. We have arguments like this in India as well. You qeustion BJP and bhakts start to bring congress in. BJP is in power, Pak establishment is in power so questions must be asked from them. Bringing PTI in, when don't hold no power is diversionary

It is not diversionary if it is being exploited by our enemy and thus should be discussed