Bangladesh Keen To Join Saudi-Pak-Turkey Defence Alliance, Says PM's Top Aide

[SteppeWolff]

Was there not some attack post Sindy and you denied Pakistani involvement there? Specifically stated no Pakistan involvement

So called immediate reaction went very quiet there.

I think it was some bombing in Delhi. All that bravado of before wasn't there, 6-0 did some real trauma on these poor folks

 

[Master Chief]

Well why don't you orchestrate another terrorist attack in India, you will discover both the reality of 6-0 and your defense pact.

Is this the excuse you need?

Well all you had to do was plant some Shaan masala packets at any of the below crime scenes in order to follow through on your threat.

Understanding the Red Fort Attack in New Delhi

A devastating suicide blast near Delhi’s Red Fort exposes the persistence of cross-border terrorism, the rise of “white-collar” radicalization, and the need for constant vigilance despite years of relative calm.

www.csis.org

15 Months After Massacre at Pahalgam, Terrorists Target Non-local Civilians Again in Kashmir

Two laborers from central India were shot dead at a brick kiln in Kulgam in the Kashmir valley on July 31.

thediplomat.com

Third time will perhaps trigger the response?

 

[r3alist]

Lol..I can but laugh at this self serving delusional.

Feeling is mutual

What happened to Pakistan is isolated, the world cannot do anything without India in the room

Looks like everything's happened with India out the room, and left to monitoring closely, delusional is who lol

I think it was some bombing in Delhi. All that bravado of before wasn't there, 6-0 did some real trauma on these poor folks

That's the one.


Indians became very pro Pakistan, no Pakistan evidence lol

 

[SteppeWolff]

Indians became very pro Pakistan, no Pakistan evidence lol

Stockholm Syndrome bro. Pakistan is the toxic partner that beats them up and they start liking us more

 

[Jaeger]

Was there not some attack post Sindy and you denied Pakistani involvement there? Specifically stated no Pakistan involvement

So called immediate reaction went very quiet there.

Are you talking about the one where a car with filled with Amonium nitrate and driven by Al - fatah university doctor from Delhi prematurely exploded on the road ?

 

[Jaeger]

InshaAllah, nothing better to see jeets scurrying around

I am sure there are a few better sights.

I heard there was an another attack in Pakistan, just today?

 

[KingQamaR]

Ok I see your point, however just because there is no geographic symmetry does not mean lack of strategic benefits


You are imagining a type of interoperability and logistics Which is years away, you take the world as you find it.

These are the bottom lines

Motherland and fatherland are the main targets, you can't protect against fatherland if motherland is able to support it.


Bangladesh with Chinese and Pakistani presence changes a great deal for India, that's a benefit itself, it has a significant strategic and psychological dividend

Finally, turkey china and Pakistan ultimately see the benefit, that's the ultimate bottom line

Geographical location is so very important and where land continuity plays a key role in logistics.

Its how NATO can move whole Armour company and all the command and logistics via railway around Eastern Europe and Baltics: To stop any Russian aggression: it’s vital Iraq joins the Pact it will connect a Turkish and Saudi land route hopefully Iran nutters help connect Pakistan to the other 3 countries. Via Iran.

Bangladeshis need to shut up and stay neutral otherwise. Israel will arm Myanmar like they did with Azerbaijan Military to fight Armenia.

 

[RocketLaw]

We need to invite SRI LANKA too (Taiwan example) - a center position in the middle of India.

 

[Avicenna]

Big things happening behind the scenes I think.

It's always been lack of political will which has retarded Bangladeshi military capability.

Maybe things will change?

Interesting times for sure.

 

[r3alist]

Are you talking about the one where a car with filled with Amonium nitrate and driven by Al - fatah university doctor from Delhi prematurely exploded on the road ?

Good man, keep that energy up

 

[Anatolia]

Selling arms to an ally is one thing. Every one does that in times of conflict.

But you are okay for your nation to be wiped out and will fight alongside Pakistanis with your soldiers and your tanks and your fighter and your ships against India, because that is what a defense pact is.

And if Pakistan - India conflict goes nuclear.

A nuclear exchange, which likely Pakistan will intiate, since India has declared no first use policy but a policy of massive retaliation.

You are okay if your nation ceases to exist because Indians called for boycott of Turkish products.

How old are you kid?

Are you serious?

this whole “India nukes Türkiye” argument isn’t grounded in reality. If India ever launched a nuclear strike on a NATO member, the consequences wouldn’t be about Türkiye alone .. it would be about NATO’s collective response.

Under Article 5, an attack on one member is treated as an attack on all. That doesn’t automatically mean nuclear retaliation, but it does mean India would instantly become an adversary of the entire alliance: the US, UK, France, Germany, Italy, and every other NATO state. Economically, diplomatically, militarily — India would be isolated overnight.

And let’s clear up another point: Türkiye actually has real allies and strategic partners. It’s a NATO member with institutional, military, and intelligence ties that have existed for decades. It has defense cooperation with the US, UK, Italy, Spain, South Korea, Qatar, Azerbaijan, Turkic states and a long list of states that work with Ankara on drones, engines, missiles, and joint exercises. Even countries that disagree with Türkiye politically still maintain military channels because of its geography and industrial capability.

India, on the other hand, is “alone,” and it operates in a very different diplomatic reality. It’s not part of any mutual defense alliance. QUAD is not a military pact. SCO is not a military pact. BRICS is not a military pact. India’s partnerships are mostly bilateral, transactional, and non‑binding. That’s not a criticism — it’s simply how India chooses to structure its foreign policy. But it also means India does not have the kind of guaranteed collective defense response that NATO members do.

So the “you’d let your nation be wiped out” line isn’t even in the realm of real geopolitics.

You realise Turkey has NATO nuclear umbrella right? How many long range missiles and nukes can you realistically deliver into Turkey bypassing their defences? 1 maybe 3?

The nuclear armageddon that NATO will respond will completely wipe out all lifeform in India with hundreds of megaton level nukes not the kiloton ones you have.

India would not exist if they tried that stunt. These Indians are so delusional its funny.