Bangladesh Socio-Political Crisis 2024

View attachment 64817

I am sorry, but I couldn't stop laughing.đŸ¤ŖđŸ¤Ŗ
āĻ•āĻĨāĻžāĻŸāĻž āĻ•āĻŋāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§ āĻ āĻŋāĻ•āĨ¤
āĻļā§‡āĻˇ āĻ…āĻŦāĻ§āĻŋ āĻ˛ā§‹āĻ•ā§‡āĻ° āĻŽāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻœāĻŋāĻœā§āĻžāĻžāĻ¸āĻž āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ āĻŽā§āĻœāĻŋāĻŦ āĻ•āĻŋ āĻ¸āĻ¤ā§āĻ¯ āĻ¸āĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻŋ āĻ†āĻ˛āĻžāĻĻāĻž āĻšāĻ¤ā§‡ āĻšāĻžā§Ÿ, āĻ¨āĻž āĻ•āĻŋ āĻāĻ‡āĻ¸āĻŦ āĻšāĻžāĻ˛ āĻŽāĻžāĻ¤ā§āĻ°, āĻ…āĻ§āĻŋāĻ•āĻžāĻ°ā§€āĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻŦāĻļā§‡ āĻ†āĻ¨āĻŦāĻžāĻ° āĻœāĻ¨ā§āĻ¯āĨ¤
 
āĻ•āĻĨāĻžāĻŸāĻž āĻ•āĻŋāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§ āĻ āĻŋāĻ•āĨ¤
āĻļā§‡āĻˇ āĻ…āĻŦāĻ§āĻŋ āĻ˛ā§‹āĻ•ā§‡āĻ° āĻŽāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻœāĻŋāĻœā§āĻžāĻžāĻ¸āĻž āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ āĻŽā§āĻœāĻŋāĻŦ āĻ•āĻŋ āĻ¸āĻ¤ā§āĻ¯ āĻ¸āĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻŋ āĻ†āĻ˛āĻžāĻĻāĻž āĻšāĻ¤ā§‡ āĻšāĻžā§Ÿ, āĻ¨āĻž āĻ•āĻŋ āĻāĻ‡āĻ¸āĻŦ āĻšāĻžāĻ˛ āĻŽāĻžāĻ¤ā§āĻ°, āĻ…āĻ§āĻŋāĻ•āĻžāĻ°ā§€āĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻŦāĻļā§‡ āĻ†āĻ¨āĻŦāĻžāĻ° āĻœāĻ¨ā§āĻ¯āĨ¤

The problem with him is, whatever he did for us before 1971, (which wasn't small either) is outweighed by his and his goons' horrible deeds after independence.
 

Lu due in Dhaka; Washington to call Delhi ‘not to disturb’ Dhaka​


1726341514353.png

Donald Lu, US State Department Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of South And Central Asian Affairs, is coming to Bangladesh. He is arriving in Dhaka on Saturday (September 14) with a delegation led by Brent Neiman, assistant secretary of the Treasury for International Finance and Development at the US Department of the Treasury.​


Donald Lu is not coming directly from Washington to Dhaka. He will arrive in Dhaka via New Delhi, the capital of India. There, Donald Lu will jointly chair the Washington-Delhi Intersessional Dialogue on Defense. In this meeting, besides the bilateral issues of the United States and India, the issue of Bangladesh will be important in the discussion. Washington will send a message to Delhi “not to disturb Dhaka”.


This information was revealed by high-level diplomatic sources in Dhaka, Delhi, and Washington.


The sources state that after the political situation change in Dhaka on August 5, the United States is giving utmost importance to the relationship with Bangladesh. They want Bangladesh to turn around. Therefore, Washington will want to know the needs of Bangladesh to overcome the current crisis. At the same time, Bangladesh and the United States will also discuss how to cooperate in the future.

A US diplomat said that the delegation has been arranged keeping in mind the overall context. Besides Neiman and Lu, the team includes the United States Agency for Development (USAID) Deputy Assistant Administrator for Asia Anjali Kaur. The delegation will come to Dhaka on September 14. They are scheduled to leave Dhaka on September 16.



This will be the first visit to Bangladesh by a high-level delegation from Washington after the Interim Government led by Nobel-winning economist Dr. Muhammad Yunus took over. The delegation will meet the Chief Adviser on Sunday morning. Apart from this, there is a schedule of meetings with Finance Adviser Salehuddin Ahmed, Foreign Affairs Advisor Md. Touhid Hossain and Foreign Secretary Jasim Uddin.


An official of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Bangladesh said that the meeting will mainly focus on issues of cooperation in dealing with the current crisis in Bangladesh. An announcement of immediate cooperation may come. Besides, long-term cooperation issues will be decided by the delegation back to Washington. They will mainly want to know the needs of Bangladesh from the visit.


Regarding the visit of the US delegation, Foreign Secretary Jashim Uddin said that the visit of the US delegation after the Interim Government took over proved that “the US attaches importance to the relationship with Bangladesh”. Multidimensional issues will be discussed between the two countries and there will be no limitations to any specific subject. Bangladesh is preparing per this.


What importance will be given by Dhaka in the discussion? When asked, Jashim Uddin said, “We will discuss the issues related to interest.”


Why Lu in the discussion


Although there is a senior official in the US delegation on the visit, Donald Lu’s name has come up in the discussion – because the senior US diplomat will lead the intercessional dialogue in India before setting foot in Bangladesh. Along with Donald Lu, the US delegation will be led by Jedidiah P. Royal, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs of the US Department of Defense. On behalf of India, the officials of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Defense will lead the dialogue.


According to sources, in this defense-related official-level dialogue, along with other cooperation from India, the issue of security will be highlighted as always. Before this, the topic of Bangladesh has repeatedly come up in such dialogues.

An Indian diplomat said that “after the formation of Sheikh Hasina's government in 2009, the kind of headache that India had with the North-Eastern region has completely disappeared”. No need to spend extra money on that part separately for security. Due to the change in the political landscape of Bangladesh, India is in a state of uncertainty. The extent to which Delhi was confident about Sheikh Hasina while it is not at that level with the current government.


The diplomat said that India will highlight issues such as the persecution of minorities in Bangladesh, the anti-India campaign in Dhaka and the influence of militancy. However, the United States is currently not giving as much importance to the issue of militancy as it did after the 9/11 Twin Towers attacks. From that position, the United States is currently giving more importance to issues such as democracy, human rights and labor rights.


US diplomatic sources say that issues like democracy, human rights and labor rights have been neglected in Bangladesh for a long time. Since Sheikh Hasina’s government listened to India, Washington has discussed these challenges with Delhi several times. However, India has always avoided the issues on the pretext of security. Washington will now send a message to Delhi not to disturb Dhaka or apply any pressure.


Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke to US President Joe Biden over the phone after Sheikh Hasina left Bangladesh for India recently. After the phone conversation, Modi told the X handle that there was a discussion with Biden about the persecution of minorities in Bangladesh. However, Joe Biden did not say anything about the Bangladesh issue regarding the discussion with Narendra Modi on his X handle.

Meanwhile, on September 10, The Economic Times of India wrote about Donald Lu’s visit that Lu will visit India and Bangladesh from September 10 to 16. The issue of Bangladesh will come up in the meeting with India. The two countries will discuss the ongoing crises in Bangladesh, especially the law and order situation, the anti-India campaign, and the influence of extremists.


About Donald Lu’s visit, the US State Department said that Lu will join the US inter-agency delegation on a visit to Bangladesh. The delegation will discuss with the Interim Government how the United States can support Bangladesh’s economic growth, financial stability and development needs. The team will include representatives from the US State Department, Treasury Department, USAID and Commerce Department.


Recently, Brent Neiman said, “The United States is hopeful that through the necessary reforms, Bangladesh will be able to eliminate economic fragility and create a strong foundation for ensuring uninterrupted growth and development.”

He said that the United States will support Bangladesh’s involvement with the IMF and other international financial institutions. The United States will also support the economic development that Bangladesh wants to accelerate through deep reforms of the financial sector, reduction of corruption, and development of a sustainable revenue system.



 

Lu due in Dhaka; Washington to call Delhi ‘not to disturb’ Dhaka​


View attachment 64859

Donald Lu, US State Department Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of South And Central Asian Affairs, is coming to Bangladesh. He is arriving in Dhaka on Saturday (September 14) with a delegation led by Brent Neiman, assistant secretary of the Treasury for International Finance and Development at the US Department of the Treasury.​


Donald Lu is not coming directly from Washington to Dhaka. He will arrive in Dhaka via New Delhi, the capital of India. There, Donald Lu will jointly chair the Washington-Delhi Intersessional Dialogue on Defense. In this meeting, besides the bilateral issues of the United States and India, the issue of Bangladesh will be important in the discussion. Washington will send a message to Delhi “not to disturb Dhaka”.


This information was revealed by high-level diplomatic sources in Dhaka, Delhi, and Washington.


The sources state that after the political situation change in Dhaka on August 5, the United States is giving utmost importance to the relationship with Bangladesh. They want Bangladesh to turn around. Therefore, Washington will want to know the needs of Bangladesh to overcome the current crisis. At the same time, Bangladesh and the United States will also discuss how to cooperate in the future.

A US diplomat said that the delegation has been arranged keeping in mind the overall context. Besides Neiman and Lu, the team includes the United States Agency for Development (USAID) Deputy Assistant Administrator for Asia Anjali Kaur. The delegation will come to Dhaka on September 14. They are scheduled to leave Dhaka on September 16.



This will be the first visit to Bangladesh by a high-level delegation from Washington after the Interim Government led by Nobel-winning economist Dr. Muhammad Yunus took over. The delegation will meet the Chief Adviser on Sunday morning. Apart from this, there is a schedule of meetings with Finance Adviser Salehuddin Ahmed, Foreign Affairs Advisor Md. Touhid Hossain and Foreign Secretary Jasim Uddin.


An official of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Bangladesh said that the meeting will mainly focus on issues of cooperation in dealing with the current crisis in Bangladesh. An announcement of immediate cooperation may come. Besides, long-term cooperation issues will be decided by the delegation back to Washington. They will mainly want to know the needs of Bangladesh from the visit.


Regarding the visit of the US delegation, Foreign Secretary Jashim Uddin said that the visit of the US delegation after the Interim Government took over proved that “the US attaches importance to the relationship with Bangladesh”. Multidimensional issues will be discussed between the two countries and there will be no limitations to any specific subject. Bangladesh is preparing per this.


What importance will be given by Dhaka in the discussion? When asked, Jashim Uddin said, “We will discuss the issues related to interest.”


Why Lu in the discussion


Although there is a senior official in the US delegation on the visit, Donald Lu’s name has come up in the discussion – because the senior US diplomat will lead the intercessional dialogue in India before setting foot in Bangladesh. Along with Donald Lu, the US delegation will be led by Jedidiah P. Royal, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs of the US Department of Defense. On behalf of India, the officials of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Defense will lead the dialogue.




An Indian diplomat said that “after the formation of Sheikh Hasina's government in 2009, the kind of headache that India had with the North-Eastern region has completely disappeared”. No need to spend extra money on that part separately for security. Due to the change in the political landscape of Bangladesh, India is in a state of uncertainty. The extent to which Delhi was confident about Sheikh Hasina while it is not at that level with the current government.


The diplomat said that India will highlight issues such as the persecution of minorities in Bangladesh, the anti-India campaign in Dhaka and the influence of militancy. However, the United States is currently not giving as much importance to the issue of militancy as it did after the 9/11 Twin Towers attacks. From that position, the United States is currently giving more importance to issues such as democracy, human rights and labor rights.


US diplomatic sources say that issues like democracy, human rights and labor rights have been neglected in Bangladesh for a long time. Since Sheikh Hasina’s government listened to India, Washington has discussed these challenges with Delhi several times. However, India has always avoided the issues on the pretext of security. Washington will now send a message to Delhi not to disturb Dhaka or apply any pressure.




Meanwhile, on September 10, The Economic Times of India wrote about Donald Lu’s visit that Lu will visit India and Bangladesh from September 10 to 16. The issue of Bangladesh will come up in the meeting with India. The two countries will discuss the ongoing crises in Bangladesh, especially the law and order situation, the anti-India campaign, and the influence of extremists.


About Donald Lu’s visit, the US State Department said that Lu will join the US inter-agency delegation on a visit to Bangladesh. The delegation will discuss with the Interim Government how the United States can support Bangladesh’s economic growth, financial stability and development needs. The team will include representatives from the US State Department, Treasury Department, USAID and Commerce Department.




He said that the United States will support Bangladesh’s involvement with the IMF and other international financial institutions. The United States will also support the economic development that Bangladesh wants to accelerate through deep reforms of the financial sector, reduction of corruption, and development of a sustainable revenue system.



I don’t want to blame India completely about AL regime. If someone is offering freebies , why would anyone turn it down ?
The worthless enlightened atel class once again crawling out of the woodwork as usual full of cognitive dissonance trying to create cultural issues out of nothing.
Son of Golam Azam spent 8 years in a forced disappearance is a non-issue, however his call to change National anthem got them up in arms.
Just when you think these idiots reached the bottom of the barrel and can’t go any lower, they surprise you by digging through the bottom.

Yea this atel class will try very best to rehabilitate AL.
 
Last edited:
Two more Awami kanzeer got caught on the to their father land. Inquilabi Salam to the people for giving them some dulaai before handing them over to police.


 
Another one - Former MP and Minister and actor Asaduzzaman Noor

1726459360749.png

 
An Indian diplomat said that “after the formation of Sheikh Hasina's government in 2009, the kind of headache that India had with the North-Eastern region has completely disappeared”. No need to spend extra money on that part separately for security. Due to the change in the political landscape of Bangladesh, India is in a state of uncertainty. The extent to which Delhi was confident about Sheikh Hasina while it is not at that level with the current government.


The diplomat said that India will highlight issues such as the persecution of minorities in Bangladesh, the anti-India campaign in Dhaka and the influence of militancy. However, the United States is currently not giving as much importance to the issue of militancy as it did after the 9/11 Twin Towers attacks. From that position, the United States is currently giving more importance to issues such as democracy, human rights and labor rights.

Militancy is not as rife in Bangladesh as other places of the Muslim World. That is why it is not high on America's threat matrix. The facts speak for themselves.

If India is to have any real credibility in Bangladesh, it needs to change its approach. They cannot just root for a tyrant and expect things to go smoothly in the long run as they found out the hard way.

The North Eastern Indians should have their own say so that they can determine their own future in a democratic fashion. Identity politics is going make things harder for them and the mainlanders. Let alone weaponizing religion and hijacking a nation.

The money coming in from the U.S. is beneficial without a doubt. However, the law & order is still very precarious in parts outside Dhaka. All that work will become meaningless. The AL are still trying very hard to destabilize Bangladesh. Just recently, a BNP activist was murdered allegedly by AL fanatics in Gopalgonj which is still largely under AL control.


I would say that even our national security is still extremely fragile given that much of the police force and other security wings haven't even reported for duty. What are they doing right now?

The interim government needs to address the security issues seriously. Hasina is till instigating violence and instability in Bangladesh as we speak while sitting in New Delhi. They cannot do that. Once a leader is in exile, he/she is in exile. Full stop. We need to send them a very clear message.

Also, I don't want to hijack the discussion, but why is Daily Star/Prothom Alo along with some other media outlets putting a communal angle to the political violence in our country? Political activists can be of any religion, right? No?
 
Militancy is not as rife in Bangladesh as other places of the Muslim World. That is why it is not high on America's threat matrix. The facts speak for themselves.
Speaking just of Bangladesh and the Indian north-east, none of the supposed nexus was due to militancy in Bangladesh. It was far more due to a combination of slackening of vigilance over visitors who stayed on for extended periods, and to greedy elements who made money ensuring safe houses and military supplies to the insurgents. Neither of these impulses needed Bangladeshi militancy. If there have been Indian insinuations about complicity that referred to militancy, those were extensions of a mindset that assumed that religiosity bred its own hostile impulses.

If India is to have any real credibility in Bangladesh, it needs to change its approach. They cannot just root for a tyrant and expect things to go smoothly in the long run as they found out the hard way.
This is a trope repeated so often that it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. None of what is suggested above was ever so intense; it may be that the mutual agreement was rather too great for an absolutely independent stand by either side about the inclinations of the other. Maybe the BJP encouraged Awami League measures as a kind of wish-fulfilment, what they would have liked to do in India but were unable to do. Maybe the Awami League encouraged the BJP thinking about India's relations with neighbouring countries, creating an impression that one response to India was valid, and proved the falsity of other responses.

No need to obsess about it.

The North Eastern Indians should have their own say so that they can determine their own future in a democratic fashion. Identity politics is going make things harder for them and the mainlanders. Let alone weaponizing religion and hijacking a nation.
Really? Thank you for the free advice.

Also, I don't want to hijack the discussion, but why is Daily Star/Prothom Alo along with some other media outlets putting a communal angle to the political violence in our country? Political activists can be of any religion, right? No?
Read your own posts. You will get the answer.
 
Speaking just of Bangladesh and the Indian north-east, none of the supposed nexus was due to militancy in Bangladesh. It was far more due to a combination of slackening of vigilance over visitors who stayed on for extended periods, and to greedy elements who made money ensuring safe houses and military supplies to the insurgents. Neither of these impulses needed Bangladeshi militancy. If there have been Indian insinuations about complicity that referred to militancy, those were extensions of a mindset that assumed that religiosity bred its own hostile impulses.

Is this referring to people like Lutfozzaman Babar by any chance?

This is a trope repeated so often that it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. None of what is suggested above was ever so intense; it may be that the mutual agreement was rather too great for an absolutely independent stand by either side about the inclinations of the other. Maybe the BJP encouraged Awami League measures as a kind of wish-fulfilment, what they would have liked to do in India but were unable to do. Maybe the Awami League encouraged the BJP thinking about India's relations with neighbouring countries, creating an impression that one response to India was valid, and proved the falsity of other responses.

No need to obsess about it.

Sometime it helps being paranoid. Especially what I have witnessed over the past 15 years and the horrors from July till August 4th.

Never again.

But I am confident we can have a working relationship with India be it under Congress or BJP.

Really? Thank you for the free advice.

You are welcome. I would have similar advise for Myanmar as well.

Once those areas are stable and folks are content, it will create a pathway for us to become an ASEAN member and generating wealth. That is the goal.

Read your own posts. You will get the answer.

So you are saying that I am like Donald Trump or something?
 
Great feedback from Bangladeshi-American political scientist Ali Riaz regarding the challenges facing the interim government.

Constitution needs rewriting to bar autocracy

1726493001464.png

Bangladeshi-American political scientist Ali Riaz spoke to The Daily Star's Sadi Muhammad Alok and Sharif M Shafique about the uprising, the constitution, wholesale cases and arrests, and ties with the US and India, among other issues.

TDS: What's your take on the uprising that toppled the Awami League regime?

Ali Riaz: This didn't happen suddenly. Oppression, murders, enforced disappearances, and extrajudicial killings over the last 15 years played a key role here. Anger from these things combined with the 36-day student movement and determined the fate of autocrat Sheikh Hasina. The young students played a vital role in breaking the culture of fear, which was the base of her government's operation. People got out of that culture and took to the streets when the students called Hasina a dictator.

TDS: How would you define the regime's fall, described as a "revolution" or "mass uprising" by some and a "second independence" by others?

Ali Riaz: Definitely it's a mass uprising carried out by the mass people because the autocrat was ousted by their participation in a student movement. I wouldn't call it a "revolution" because that requires a post-revolution government by the revolutionists, which did not happen. Again, I wouldn't call it a "second independence". The 1990's movement was also called a "second independence" then.

I want to place the Liberation War above everything.

TDS: What are your observations on the activities of the interim government in its first month in office?

Ali Riaz: This government is facing huge challenges that were not seen before as people have put their trust in the interim administration formed under special circumstances. We cannot say that they are flawless. There are some criticisms. Overall, I can say that they are moving forward despite various obstacles. They aren't stuck or moving backwards. But I'd be happier if their activities were more dynamic.

The police and the administration collapsed and they could not be reformed yet. I can see that some quarters are trying to destabilise the country. There are attempts to instigate and create pressure from within and outside the country.

Overall, it wouldn't be right to assess them so hastily. We shall continue to talk, keep pressure and express our expectations.

TDS: Is it possible for the advisers, who have no experience in politics, to create a healthy political environment?

Ali Riaz: One of the main responsibilities of the hastily formed government is to create a new political arrangement that'll prevent the re-establishment of an autocratic rule in the future. Structural reforms and a political roadmap are needed for this. The government needs to specify its goal about politics and the way to achieve it, which is possible through discussions with the political parties, civil society and the student leaders. We're waiting for that. The government has formed several commissions for reforms, which is a positive move.

TDS: You've spoken about rewriting the constitution. Why? And how the interim government can do it?

Ali Riaz: One-third of the existing constitution has been declared unamendable. But it allows one to become incredibly powerful and it has some paths for creating autocracy. Rewriting the constitution is necessary to block these paths.

The July uprising has created such hopes and aspirations among the people that cannot be achieved by just amending the constitution. Besides, it is also necessary to ensure human rights, freedom of expression and accountability, and to make the state obliged to ensure these.

Rewriting the constitution is not solely the government's responsibility. Citizens and political parties should also be involved. I have suggested three possible ways.

The first is to form a constituent assembly, which can be done through election. The assembly and the interim government can work together to draft a constitution and hold a referendum on it.

Secondly, the interim government can draft a constitution and go for a referendum after taking expert opinions. The third option is to form a constitutional convention in consultation with all the political parties, and the draft constitution will be developed for referendum.

I am suggesting a referendum for all three options because people's opinions must be taken into consideration.

There might be other options, but at first, we need to decide whether we want to rewrite the constitution or just to amend it like we did in the past.

TDS: How can we stop the old practice of arresting and filing cases indiscriminately and taking people in remand arbitrarily?

Ali Riaz: Cases are being filed indiscriminately because of people's pent-up anger, which must be kept in mind. But I fear the cases will lose merit if they are being filed in such a manner. The government can form a separate cell to review each complaint. Based on the review, well-founded cases can be filed by the authorities.

Proper emphasis should be given on the killings during the 36-day movement in July and August. Sheikh Hasina, Obaidul Quader, the former home minister, and the former law minister must be held responsible because they gave orders to carry out such a massacre. They must be tried for committing crimes against humanity. Those who executed the orders should be tried based on the severity of the offences they committed. To ensure justice, all the perpetrators must be put on trial.

TDS: There are noticeable tensions in India-Bangladesh relationship. What are your thoughts?

Ali Riaz: Bilateral relationships must be based on equity and fairness, which was not the case for India-Bangladesh ties. India has done everything to keep an autocratic government in power here. Now, the people of Bangladesh have ousted that regime with the hope of restoring democracy. But, the Indian government is not willing to accept this reality.

The interim government has positive gestures towards the Indian government, but India's response is negative. India, not Bangladesh, is creating these tensions. So, India must resolve this. I hope, this relationship will be established on equity and fairness in future.

TDS: It is said that Bangladesh is entering the US's circle after the fall of Hasina. How correct is this?

Ali Riaz: Can the people who are making such statements give any specific evidence or sign to back their claims? Is there any change in US-Bangladesh relationship after August 5? I don't think so. Claiming Bangladesh is entering the US-led camp means spreading misinformation. Sticking to any bloc is like an attack on the country's sovereignty. The relationship with countries should be based on equity and fairness, whether with India, China, the US, Japan, Germany or others. National interests with sovereignty at the core should be the guiding factor in these relationships. Dhaka should communicate with Washington, Tokyo, Brussels, New Delhi directly, which is a natural thing for any sovereign nation. There was an idea that the US sees Bangladesh from India's standpoint. Will Washington change its policy to communicate with Dhaka directly bypassing New Delhi? Such signs aren't noticeable yet.

Source: https://www.thedailystar.net/news/bangladesh/news/constitution-needs-rewriting-bar-autocracy-3704011
 
The problem is any BD govt has always been being reactive. Friendship with everyone is no policy, it makes you look weak in the world of real politic. None ever worked with any core set of national interests principles. All policies should run under those above mentioned principles.
India can claim anything about minorities, that’s fine. Just send a statement calling these baseless. Remind them they got insurgency running all over where the sunâ€Ļ. . There is absolutely no need to give any explanation. Do not play the game as those folks want you to play, so they can set the tone of exchangees.
You are dealing with folks that takes being nice as sign of weakness. This is how most of the decent nations run their foreign policies.
 
Last edited:
Murgi kabir has been arrested. One of the happiest day ever. Dalal ibn e dalal.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top