Krptonite
INT'L MOD
You’re conflating political considerations with sports management, which I believe is the core issue of disagreement here.In an ideal world your arguments would make perfect sense. But BCCI and IPL runs on money, not on righteousness. If BCCI is threatened with an economic loss they are going to bend. Is this righteous? No. It is simply a better business decision. It's a lose - lose situation do you want to anger BD fans who are already angry with whatever about India, or you want to anger Indian fans, after BD spreading those hate online, you want India to accept BD players making money off IPL and thereby fans boycotting the game. No.
BCCI’s mandate is to promote the interests of Indian cricket. This is not served well by banning a player for his or her nationality alone, i.e., guilt by association rather than individual actions.
If a player has done no wrong, you cannot, on principle, exclude him or her, period. That is what institutional integrity is. For a sport that has fewer than ten countries dedicated to playing it, excluding our neighbours on this basis is harmful to Indian cricket in the long run.
If today, on the basis of nationality, commercial interests, and public sentiment, one takes decisions, then you are not safeguarding Indian cricket but its means of earning money. Sports management and political considerations are not the same and are often at odds with each other.
We’ve showcased a detachment of business and political considerations with China, why the double standards here?
Last edited:







