'Be prepared for unexpected': Rajnath Singh tells Armed forces 'keep eye on happenings in neighbouring countries' (Bangladesh)

[Alter_Ego]

Relax
There wont be any war.

 

[Dalit]

Has the Indians struck yet?

 

[Joe Shearer]

Has Rajoo struck yet?

No.
Still busy ironing his pajamas.

 

[itsanufy]

I may reproduce my detailed response in another forum, where I had to point out that the detection was done by the BD authorities, at the time that the BNP was in office, arrests were made (in 2004) by those authorities, that only after the BNP government changed were confessions and accusations put around, two years after the BNP left office, and by one out of 45 arrested people.

This particular chargesheet and indictment must be one of the silliest framed, and judged.

Yes BNP was power. The arms consignment was caught by change. BNP tried their best to supress. The case got a fair trial as BNP govt was out in 6 months.
The Bangladesh National Party, which led the government at the time of the smuggling incident, resigned at end of term in October 2006 and a caretaker government took charge for the 90-day period until elections.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Yes BNP was power. The arms consignment was caught by change. BNP tried their best to supress. The case got a fair trial as BNP govt was out in 6 months.
The Bangladesh National Party, which led the government at the time of the smuggling incident, resigned at end of term in October 2006 and a caretaker government took charge for the 90-day period until elections.

How did the BNP try to suppress the evidence? Does the arrest of 45 men constitute suppression? Was publicity about the matter suppressed?

This happened in 2004, the BNP handed over to the interim government in 2006, and we are asked to believe that all the suppression did not work, but there was suppression that nobody knows about other than people on line?

The caretaker government neither made the arrests nor brought the trial, nor received the lone confession. All the activity, including the publication of (again, noteworthy) an individual's statement that he had tried to publicise the matter before but not been heard was under the Awami League government. Incidentally, even when the AL was ruling, the lone individual's confession was not known for two years.

Does it seem even slightly strange that, omitting the suppression that the previous (BNP) government might have attempted before 2006, it took two full years of a changed regime for him to be heard?

 

[itsanufy]

Amazing to read that the action taken to arrest the insurgents is compromised, according to you, by the failure of the BD government to deny the raid or the capture of these insurgents. So the action is worthless, the failure to loudly proclaim its failure to keep out anti-India elements is a greater matter.

Seriously?


Fabulous. So whatever action the BD authorities might take, to uproot any traces on its soil of anti-India insurgency, they continue to be culpable, since their earlier denials prove that they were all along acting in good faith.


So now we have an improvement on the theme. Now, it is no longer Indian origin insurgents discovered in BD territory, it is Bangladesh origin insurgents against the Bangladesh government that prove that the Bangladesh government was hostile to India.

By that logic, every insurgent movement in India against state governments or the central government is proof that India sponsors terrorism. Against itself? Yes, against herself.


According to whom? Every one of these instances is reported by Indian intelligence, and unsupported by any corroborating evidence from Bangladesh, even during the period of maximum domination of the Awami League, supposedly a sharply contrasting party to the BNP.

It makes painful reading to go through these wild accusations.


Quoting a single journalist's very one-sided report surely must seem flimsy even to so bitter a critic as you. Perhaps, however, from your point of view, these are equal to signed pleas of guilt by the shadowy accused.

To what extent are we prepared to go to manufacture and to promote these conspiracy theories?

These are facts and these were in response to you mentioning BD never harboured any other ultras other than ULFA.
These facts also proved that BD has has always tried to destabilize N.E.
its fact that Khaleda has told in a press conference that ULFA are freedom fighter.

 

[itsanufy]

This is what happens when ignorance breeds with an excess of patriotism. If you had ever been in those parts, you would have known that the Chhitmahals are tiny pieces of land, and that combining them to form a contiguous tract is a ridiculous idea.

Practically or politically?
Sorry its not me. If you can read Bengali there are some articles from Anandabazar archive where you can get confirmation.

 

[Joe Shearer]

These are facts

Really? Says who?

these were in response to you mentioning BD never harboured any other ultras other than ULFA.

Each instance being floated on pure conjecture or by reports that are highly suspect, by the same intelligence sources that failed to predict the Manipur violence, or, in the case of the West Bengal incidents or forecast incidents, by agencies that have displayed that they are compromised.

These facts also proved that BD has has always tried to destabilize N.E.

No facts, so what proof?

its fact that Khaleda has told in a press conference that ULFA are freedom fighter.

Please do not distort information.
Khaleda Zia said that ULFA might be compared to the Mukti Bahini.
That sort of comparison is silly, but does not constitute active cooperation with ULFA or proof of interference in the north-east.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Practically or politically?

Practically.

If you can read Bengali there are some articles from Anandabazar archive where you can get confirmation.

So now Ananda Bazar is the intelligence agency that we should depend upon? Good going.

 

[Afif]

These are facts and these were in response to you mentioning BD never harboured any other ultras other than ULFA.
These facts also proved that BD has has always tried to destabilize N.E.

No, you are twisting 'facts' to fit your narrative.

Yes BNP was power. The arms consignment was caught by change. BNP tried their best to supress.

How is something caught by chance by the state's law enforcement agencies if the state itself organized the said event? O hey guys, just so you know we are sending this arms shipment along this root, make sure to patrol the area and catch it.

The case got a fair trial as BNP govt was out in 6 months.

Worse, you are making things up outright.

That Incident happened in 2004, BNP left power in 2006.

 

[LeonBlack08]

Oh please, don't flatter yourself.

BD does NOT figure in our security calculus in the way you are making it out to be

India would, however, like to see a politically stable BD, that is about all, really.

I am not making out anything. Your own media is directly pointing at Bangladesh. So if you have issues, take it up with your countrymen.

 

[Joe Shearer]

I think our Bangladeshi members are knowledgeable enough and patient enough to deal with these wholesale allegations based on rumour, conjecture and hearsay. No point in a patriotic Indian trying to reduce the irritation caused to Bangladesh members by the wild posts by right-wing Indian members.

 

[Circadian Rhythm]

Just Google Search

HUJI Bangladesh and see the Results

https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-samsung-rvo1&sca_esv=609ef708c28b7711&sca_upv=1&q=huji+bangladesh&tbm=nws&source=lnms&fbs=AEQNm0Aa4sjWe7Rqy32pFwRj0UkWd8nbOJfsBGGB5IQQO6L3JyJJclJuzBPl12qJyPx7ESIJGrw-8wOtrT6OJapeZNCM5D9iV39TqF1cwdS0XuEzAWHX8tZajJRzf5yXMaZSP2o4a7Hd7d3-8gcRw02Z-zJEgLxLbUON3CXWoawTkTKWWEQ2OQWLlJgPXiFVmxxl0vOl7ft0GxhosuNOEBrRGUad1TT-PA&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiPzKPJlLGIAxVMcGwGHX21FZUQ0pQJegQIDBAB&biw=384&bih=688&dpr=2.81

 

[Circadian Rhythm]

 

[Reichsmarschall]

China is vary good friend as Pakistan has submitted some portion of her territory to her

... In exchange for some portion of Chinese territory. I know Indian writers claim Pakistan seceded 5000 sq. Miles but that's just them being salty.