Breaking News: Yemen's Houthis strike Saudi Arabia's Abha airport with missiles and drones in a sharp escalation

[mythbuster]

only thing cryptic here is your BS that is always easily floored and the worst held opinion, on this whole forum!

quite a achievement!

2+2 = 5 ..
Prove it's wrong.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

2+2 = 5 ..
Prove it's wrong.

go listen to this, dont worry about my posts!
(another BS post, as always 2+2 = 5 !)
will boost your artificial ego!





sectarian and hatred filled minds, always ruling PDF threads!

 

[F.O.X]

I have debunked that claim already. Jeysh ul Islam terrorists supported and armed by Saudis had taken citizens of Madaya and Zabdani to hostage and prevented humanitarian aid from entering the city.

Its truly ridiculous to claim that Syrian government starved its own People to death.

Madaya after liberation by the Syrian Arab army. People returned to their home

View attachment 215709View attachment 215710View attachment 215711View attachment 215712View attachment 215713View attachment 215714


Iranian role in Syria was to defend the country from being overrun by Al Qaeda, ISIS and Kurdish separatist terror groups. The job was done and eventually Assad scaped to Russia like a coward. I would say that Iranian mission in Syria was almost successful. The only failure was JewLani's control over Syria which was thanks to Turkey's support for that Takfiri element.

And yes, KSA's oil infrastructures are all legitimate targets for backing USA financially.

You “debunked” Madaya by posting photos taken after the siege? Human Rights Watch spoke to residents and doctors during it. They reported that Syrian govt and Hezbollah forces surrounded the town, blocked aid, and people were dying of starvation. Photos of people going home later do not answer that.

You say Iran went to Syria to fight ISIS. Fine, but that does not erase what Iran helped Assad do to civilians opposing his tyrany . And calling the mission 'almost successful" when Assad fled to Russia is quite something.

Your Saudi argument is even worse. saying it is a legitimate target simply because KSA supports the US. Apply that rule to Pakistan then. iran gave India access to Chabahar,gave india discounted oil, backing it financially (Your Logic ) . and Pakistan has accused & provided proof of Indian operatives linked to Iran of terrorist activities in Balochistan & KPK, & also indian attack on civilian sites in Pakistan recently, does that make everything in Iran a legitimate target for Pakistan? ( as it financially helped india) Of course you would scream if someone said that.

A country having ties with your enemy does not give you a free pass to attack whatever you want. Your rule only seems to work when the target is Saudi Arabia.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

2+2 = 5 ..
Prove it's wrong.

look another 'educate' mind, telling you 2+2 = 5
will probably go over your sectarian (illiterate and ignorant!) head (in other words he will soon become cryptic journo with shia soft corner in his head!)

 

[muhammed45]

You “debunked” Madaya by posting photos taken after the siege? Human Rights Watch spoke to residents and doctors during it. They reported that Syrian govt and Hezbollah forces surrounded the town, blocked aid, and people were dying of starvation. Photos of people going home later do not answer that.

You say Iran went to Syria to fight ISIS. Fine, but that does not erase what Iran helped Assad do to civilians opposing his tyrany . And calling the mission 'almost successful" when Assad fled to Russia is quite something.

Your Saudi argument is even worse. saying it is a legitimate target simply because KSA supports the US. Apply that rule to Pakistan then. iran gave India access to Chabahar,gave india discounted oil, backing it financially (Your Logic ) . and Pakistan has accused & provided proof of Indian operatives linked to Iran of terrorist activities in Balochistan & KPK, & also indian attack on civilian sites in Pakistan recently, does that make everything in Iran a legitimate target for Pakistan? ( as it financially helped india) Of course you would scream if someone said that.

A country having ties with your enemy does not give you a free pass to attack whatever you want. Your rule only seems to work when the target is Saudi Arabia.

My proof was solid, yours was someone said something. No i don't believe the words of terrorists and their western supporters.

And i believe Iran's economic ties with India doesn't have strategic aspect. Iran doesn't support Indian petro dollar. India was just a random investor in Chabahar that after US intervention disappeared from that economic hub.

India is not Iran's puppet nor is Iran the Indian puppet regime. Totally illogical comparison.

Terrorists had also crossed Pakistani borders and attacked Iranian border guards, in a few cases, they even kidnapped Iranian border guards. It doesn't make Pakistan a US puppet all of a sudden.

 

[muhammed45]

The Houthis of today are letting the "Israeli" ships, both civilian and military, to use Bab Al-Mandab when they blockade the Saudi ships. The Houthis of today are proxies for Emiratis - who are, in turn, a proxy for the Zionists. And their recent seizure of this strait was facilitated by the Emirati Zionists. That fact needs to be understood.

Surely not. That is not the reason as you tried to portray.

UAE is small, lacks strategic depth and is vulnerable to missile attacks. Yemen hit a spot near their nuclear reactor. UAE was also competing with Sauds in Yemen. Both these reasons led to kicking UAE out of Yemen.

Step by step, Yemen will limit Bab el Mandab too.

 

[F.O.X]

My proof was solid, yours was someone said something. No i don't believe the words of terrorists and their western supporters.

And i believe Iran's economic ties with India doesn't have strategic aspect. Iran doesn't support Indian petro dollar. India was just a random investor in Chabahar that after US intervention disappeared from that economic hub.

India is not Iran's puppet nor is Iran the Indian puppet regime. Totally illogical comparison.

Terrorists had also crossed Pakistani borders and attacked Iranian border guards, in a few cases, they even kidnapped Iranian border guards. It doesn't make Pakistan a US puppet all of a sudden.

Your ''solid proof'' is photos taken after the siege. Human Rights Watch spoke to residents and doctors while it was happening. They reported that Syrian govt and Hezbollah forces surrounded Madaya and blocked aid. Photos of people going home later dont answer that.

regarding terrorists crossing from Pakistan into Iran . Did Pakistan give Israel or the US a port to operate from? No. Iran gave India access to Chabahar, and india used the same chahbhar to Kill civilians in my country. so spare me the BS. I do not believe for a second that Tehran had no idea what India was doing on its soil. If you want to dismiss that as nothing, then stop calling Saudi oil a legitimate target just because KSA has ties with the US.

My question remains the same..... if KSA’s financial ties with the US make all Saudi oil facilities legitimate targets, would you accept the same rule being applied to Iran over its ties with India? Of course you wouldn't. That rule only works when the target is KSA.

 

[muhammed45]

Your ''solid proof'' is photos taken after the siege. Human Rights Watch spoke to residents and doctors while it was happening. They reported that Syrian govt and Hezbollah forces surrounded Madaya and blocked aid. Photos of people going home later dont answer that.

regarding terrorists crossing from Pakistan into Iran . Did Pakistan give Israel or the US a port to operate from? No. Iran gave India access to Chabahar, and india used the same chahbhar to Kill civilians in my country. so spare me the BS. I do not believe for a second that Tehran had no idea what India was doing on its soil. If you want to dismiss that as nothing, then stop calling Saudi oil a legitimate target just because KSA has ties with the US.

My question remains the same..... if KSA’s financial ties with the US make all Saudi oil facilities legitimate targets, would you accept the same rule being applied to Iran over its ties with India? Of course you wouldn't. That rule only works when the target is KSA.

Dude KSA is a dictatorship and governmentally a backward tribal shithole. One family supported by British colonizers put their name on a vast land in Arabian peninsula. its like calling Pakistan kingdom of Al-SahahbazSharif or kingdom of Al-Zardari.

You bring Pakistan to lowest level where KSA is standing. Please stop embarrassing Pakistanis lol

 

[Irfan Baloch]

“Abu Lulu has followers?” Mate, there is literally a shrine in Iran traditionally attributed to Abu Lulu.


So the argument is basically: blame the Al sauds/British for what happened a century ago, support the Houthi terrorists today, lecture Pakistanis about what Pakistan should do and deliver the whole lecture comfortably from Britain.

you lost the plot buddy.. stop this sectarian BS..
Pakistan army is hunting down the Fitna AL khawarij.

 

[Irfan Baloch]

Yeah man , it's not a sectarian issue... it's just a coincidence that Hezbollah , Assad regime , Iraqi groups attacking ksa and houthis are Shias.

correction

Houthis are attacking AMERCO and American bases..
there is a difference.

I agree its not sectarian issue but all terror groups being propped in Afghanistan , Somaila and Pakistan etc are takfiri najadi's who make beheading videos ..
none of them killers are Shias or Sunnis but are Takfiri khawarij that Prophet Muhammad PBUH warned us about.

 

[Irfan Baloch]

there are more players here, more than Houthis, da&&& and IS&&

more unofficial players then official ones!

Houthis, could have attacked these targets (if they were target in their eyes!) long ago!

yea.. you see you got that right. for years the Yemani people (not just Houthis) are fighting the GCC agression.
I fully support them against those who side with Israelis and Americans and were throwing concerts when Israel was genociding Palestinians.

 

[F.O.X]

Dude KSA is a dictatorship and governmentally a backward tribal shithole. One family supported by British colonizers put their name on a vast land in Arabian peninsula. its like calling Pakistan kingdom of Al-SahahbazSharif or kingdom of Al-Zardari.

You bring Pakistan to lowest level where KSA is standing. Please stop embarrassing Pakistanis lol

nice Deflect, but not a single on my questions were answer by this BS.

 

[Starlord]

you lost the plot buddy.. stop this sectarian BS..
Pakistan army is hunting down the Fitna AL khawarij.

Dude you seriously need to stop, I enjoy your posts but you are coming off as some extremly bias sectarian loony. I get it you hate KSA but not everything they do is sectarian or evil or everything they say is a lie, or as many posters are mentioned that everything Houthis or Iran is doing favors Palestinians or against Zionists, you really need to stop this stupid Sectarian BS.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

yea.. you see you got that right. for years the Yemani people (not just Houthis) are fighting the GCC agression.
I fully support them against those who side with Israelis and Americans and were throwing concerts when Israel was genociding Palestinians.

what happens in KSA, is there business.

as a Pak. I ca say, bomb houthis, if it results in resumption of our oil supplies!

(but note the dualistic tone, here, bec, if we were capable enough to see the truth. This question would have been other way round. And, no body else would have had the ability to tighten our economic bolts!)

very pathetic way to run a country!

country in shambles and ruling class is callous and feels devoid of any emotion towards the hardships public faces!

 

[F.O.X]

KSA is USA's colony. Is that too hard to comprehend?

You keep changing the subject because you have no answer. Either admit your logic was flawed, or answer the questions I actually asked.