Let us take these arguments apart, one by one. First, you say Syria was simply the product of foreign manipulation—CIA, Turks, and the so-called “Zionists”—as though the Syrians themselves had no grievance worth mentioning. Yet the uprising began amid the wider Arab Spring, with Syrians protesting Assad’s rule; foreign powers subsequently poured money, weapons and fighters into what had begun as a domestic uprising.
But even if I were to grant your entire argument for the sake of discussion, would that not merely expose the narrowness of the argument itself? Whether the man in Damascus was Bashar al-Assad or is now Jolani, the larger question remains remarkably simple: after all the foreign powers, factions and grand geopolitical manoeuvring, where is the ordinary Syrian’s genuine freedom to choose his own leadership? And, for that matter, where is ours?
he twists things beyond belief, and then accuses others of attacking him. He has a fragile ego and doesn't like anyone "disliking" his comments or disagreeing with him, be careful, otherwise he'll trawl through your entire post history and "dislike" each and every one of them!
