Breaking News: Yemen's Houthis strike Saudi Arabia's Abha airport with missiles and drones in a sharp escalation

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

@F.O.X

since, you intend to continue trolling and because of that deluded A** H**E (CORAX) interrupting, I will hold my replies for now!

ping me back, when you are ready for serious discussion

 

[maxpane]

And for those Pakistanis who were calling this a false flag, the Pakistani government has now officially issued a press release condemning the Houthi militia’s drone attack on Makkah.

Houthis are doing israel work here and it can ignite a long religious war. What iran wnts to achieve by allowing that ?

 

[F.O.X]

Let us take these arguments apart, one by one. First, you say Syria was simply the product of foreign manipulation—CIA, Turks, and the so-called “Zionists”—as though the Syrians themselves had no grievance worth mentioning. Yet the uprising began amid the wider Arab Spring, with Syrians protesting Assad’s rule; foreign powers subsequently poured money, weapons and fighters into what had begun as a domestic uprising.

But even if I were to grant your entire argument for the sake of discussion, would that not merely expose the narrowness of the argument itself? Whether the man in Damascus was Bashar al-Assad or is now Jolani, the larger question remains remarkably simple: after all the foreign powers, factions and grand geopolitical manoeuvring, where is the ordinary Syrian’s genuine freedom to choose his own leadership? And, for that matter, where is ours?

If you need ChatGPT to write your argument, at least read it before posting. Remove the long dashes too. They make it even easier to spot.

I never said the Syrian uprising was created by the CIA, Turkey or anyone else. You invented that, then wrote two paragraphs arguing with yourself.

What I said was simple... Iran helped Assad while his forces starved and bombed Syrians. You say Syrians should choose their own leaders? Good. Then why are you defending the people who helped Assad stop them?


I have a feeling I am arguing with a 11 year old.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

If you need ChatGPT to write your argument, at least read it before posting. Remove the long dashes too. They make it even easier to spot.

I never said the Syrian uprising was created by the CIA, Turkey or anyone else. You invented that, then wrote two paragraphs arguing with yourself.

What I said was simple... Iran helped Assad while his forces starved and bombed Syrians. You say Syrians should choose their own leaders? Good. Then why are you defending the people who helped Assad stop them?


I have a feeling I am arguing with a 11 year old.

I cant argue write now, this user, attacks me personally

trolls my posts..then If I reply mod attack me without seeing through this user corax, trolls my anywhere he goes!


and no, why would you say that, CIA was behind the uprising bec, your POV is scetarian!(When in actuality you should have!)


re. AI, my choice, do you have any problem or am i under you command?!!
i will write the way it suits

you do your job, kill my argument logically!



sectarian POV, conveniently, misses key details, only to take advantage and to put all the blame on others!

 

[muhammed45]

Selective mind? You have deleted the entire beginning of the war to make your story work.

The Houthis seized Sana’a, overthrew the internationally recognised government and continued advancing. Saudi arabia interveened afterwards in support of that govt. You can condemn the Saudi air campaign and blockade for the enormous civilian suffering they caused, but pretending the Houthis were innocent bystanders until KSA suddenly invaded is simply false..

Yemen was not starved by one side alone either. Houthi obstructed and diverted humanitarian aid.

And if starving civilians is now your standard, apply it to Iran as well. Iran financed, armed and deployed forces to keep Assad in power while his regime and allied militias besieged civilian populations. In Madaya, pro Assad forces and Iran backed Hezbollah trapped civilians until people were starving. The same “surrender or starve” strategy was used across Syria, while residential areas in Aleppo and eastern Ghouta were relentlessly bombarded.

Calling Saudi oil infrastructure “petrodollar assets” is just verbal gymnastics. It remains Saudi territory and its economic lifeline. Attacking it is an attack on KSA, regardless of what fashionable label you attach to it.

Apparently Saudi actions mean condemn KSA forever, but Iranian involvement in starving and bombing Syrians disappears under the holy label of "resistance".

Alright then friend. Syria is all yours, please go take it out from beneath Israeli boots if you can.

Every war has a reason behind itself. Syria was the only anti Israeli Arab country that was an immediate neighbor of Israel, the last shield actually.

War on Yemen was supposed to benefit USA through a proxy war and conquest of Yemeni oil fields.

KSA is the main financial backer of USA. Hence, its oil sector is a legitimate target given that resistance axis is at war with USA and its Arab/Zionist proxies

 

[F.O.X]

Alright then friend. Syria is all yours, please go take it out from beneath Israeli boots if you can.

Every war has a reason behind itself. Syria was the only anti Israeli Arab country that was an immediate neighbor of Israel, the last shield actually.

War on Yemen was supposed to benefit USA through a proxy war and conquest of Yemeni oil fields.

KSA is the main financial backer of USA. Hence, its oil sector is a legitimate target given that resistance axis is at war with USA and its Arab/Zionist proxies

What does''Syria is all yours'' even mean? I pointed out what Assad did to Syrians with Iran helping him. You call Assad a shield. Were the civilians starving in Madaya a threat to that shield?

And this claim that KSA entered Yemen to steal its oil fields ( as if they need it) , where is the evidence? The Houthis had already taken Sana’a and pushed out the govt before Saudi intervention. You keep leaving that part out.

Now Saudi oil is a ''legitimate target" because KSA is close to the US. So if Iran trades with or supports someone, its oil facilities are fair game too? I doubt you would accept your own logic then.

You still haven’t answered the point. Did Iran help Assad while he starved and bombed Syrians, yes or no?

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

TTP is terrorist because of targeting Pakistani civilians.

Any group linked to USA that targets innocent civilians is a terrorist group.

If one day someone targets civilians of KSA, they will be doomed. No matter who

This war is nightmare of Zionists, imagine if Sauds lose control of Bab el Mandab and it falls into the hands of Ansarullah. Israel's Southern port which is the main hub of its red sea transitions will be shut down.

That's why they are helping Sauds at this very moment.

Btw, Ansarullah is composed of Shafei Sunnis also. Nightmare of Sauds lol

The Houthis of today are letting the "Israeli" ships, both civilian and military, to use Bab Al-Mandab when they blockade the Saudi ships. The Houthis of today are proxies for Emiratis - who are, in turn, a proxy for the Zionists. And their recent seizure of this strait was facilitated by the Emirati Zionists. That fact needs to be understood.

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

The [Mocha] airport with Emirati support and an Emirati plan, and all the infrastructure was part of an Emirati military intelligence plan for control and domination... but the Al-Masirah channel correspondent is tongue-tied on the Saudi and the Saudi and Saudi—what's the secret behind ignoring the name of the Emirates!?

 

[mythbuster]

Why do you people have selective mind?

KSA has invaded Yemen and starved them to death not vice verse.

Btw, attack on KSA's oil sector is same as attacking petro dollar assets.

Why do you support a small sect that's less than 25% of the population to take over the entire country by force? ...in case of Syria less than 5% .

 

[muhammed45]

What does''Syria is all yours'' even mean? I pointed out what Assad did to Syrians with Iran helping him. You call Assad a shield. Were the civilians starving in Madaya a threat to that shield?

And this claim that KSA entered Yemen to steal its oil fields ( as if they need it) , where is the evidence? The Houthis had already taken Sana’a and pushed out the govt before Saudi intervention. You keep leaving that part out.

Now Saudi oil is a ''legitimate target" because KSA is close to the US. So if Iran trades with or supports someone, its oil facilities are fair game too? I doubt you would accept your own logic then.

You still haven’t answered the point. Did Iran help Assad while he starved and bombed Syrians, yes or no?

I have debunked that claim already. Jeysh ul Islam terrorists supported and armed by Saudis had taken citizens of Madaya and Zabdani to hostage and prevented humanitarian aid from entering the city.

Its truly ridiculous to claim that Syrian government starved its own People to death.

Madaya after liberation by the Syrian Arab army. People returned to their home




Iranian role in Syria was to defend the country from being overrun by Al Qaeda, ISIS and Kurdish separatist terror groups. The job was done and eventually Assad scaped to Russia like a coward. I would say that Iranian mission in Syria was almost successful. The only failure was JewLani's control over Syria which was thanks to Turkey's support for that Takfiri element.

And yes, KSA's oil infrastructures are all legitimate targets for backing USA financially.

 

[muhammed45]

Why do you support a small sect that's less than 25% of the population to take over the entire country by force? ...in case of Syria less than 5% .

Because they support Gaza, they want to fight Zionists and US proxies in the region. Simple

This support is not a sectarian issue, since a large number of Ansrallah forces come from Shafei Sunnis e.g. Muradi tribe.

 

[mythbuster]

Let me lay out the shape of your argument, point by point, so that you may see it plainly:

1. It is a majoosi kafir country; it supported Syria’s dictator, backed Hezbollah, and inflicted great suffering upon the Arabs there—therefore, it is deemed an enemy of Muslims.
2. It is an enemy of Muslims because it has carried out attacks against Saudi Arabia and other Arab states.
3. It is a non-Muslim state because it has enabled the Houthis to carry out attacks against Saudi Arabia.
4. And it is a non-Muslim state because it weakens a Muslim country.

This sums up all your arguments!

and one more argument,


5. IR is using Houthis to attack KSA

Now write some cryptic nonsense to prove that what you wrote above is not true .

 

[mythbuster]

Because they support Gaza, they want to fight Zionists and US proxies in the region. Simple

This support is not a sectarian issue, since a large number of Ansrallah forces come from Shafei Sunnis e.g. Muradi tribe.

Yeah man , it's not a sectarian issue... it's just a coincidence that Hezbollah , Assad regime , Iraqi groups attacking ksa and houthis are Shias.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

Now write some cryptic nonsense to prove that what you wrote above is not true .

only thing cryptic here is your BS that is always easily floored and the worst held opinion, on this whole forum!

quite a achievement!

 

[muhammed45]

Yeah man , it's not a sectarian issue... it's just a coincidence that Hezbollah , Assad regime , Iraqi groups attacking ksa and houthis are Shias.

Iraqi government is not that friendly with Iran if you ask me. They have lately started to become an other US regional puppy.

What is their sin when we all are witnessing that KSA is the main base of Anglo Saxon savages in Islamic world? Every person would admit that KSA is the most valuable asset of USA in the heartland of Muslims.