Breaking News: Yemen's Houthis strike Saudi Arabia's Abha airport with missiles and drones in a sharp escalation

[mythbuster]

Because they support Gaza, they want to fight Zionists and US proxies in the region. Simple

This support is not a sectarian issue, since a large number of Ansrallah forces come from Shafei Sunnis e.g. Muradi tribe.

Yeah man , it's not a sectarian issue... it's just a coincidence that Hezbollah , Assad regime , Iraqi groups attacking ksa and houthis are Shias.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

Now write some cryptic nonsense to prove that what you wrote above is not true .

only thing cryptic here is your BS that is always easily floored and the worst held opinion, on this whole forum!

quite a achievement!

 

[muhammed45]

Yeah man , it's not a sectarian issue... it's just a coincidence that Hezbollah , Assad regime , Iraqi groups attacking ksa and houthis are Shias.

Iraqi government is not that friendly with Iran if you ask me. They have lately started to become an other US regional puppy.

What is their sin when we all are witnessing that KSA is the main base of Anglo Saxon savages in Islamic world? Every person would admit that KSA is the most valuable asset of USA in the heartland of Muslims.

 

[mythbuster]

only thing cryptic here is your BS that is always easily floored and the worst held opinion, on this whole forum!

quite a achievement!

2+2 = 5 ..
Prove it's wrong.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

2+2 = 5 ..
Prove it's wrong.

go listen to this, dont worry about my posts!
(another BS post, as always 2+2 = 5 !)
will boost your artificial ego!





sectarian and hatred filled minds, always ruling PDF threads!

 

[F.O.X]

I have debunked that claim already. Jeysh ul Islam terrorists supported and armed by Saudis had taken citizens of Madaya and Zabdani to hostage and prevented humanitarian aid from entering the city.

Its truly ridiculous to claim that Syrian government starved its own People to death.

Madaya after liberation by the Syrian Arab army. People returned to their home

View attachment 215709View attachment 215710View attachment 215711View attachment 215712View attachment 215713View attachment 215714


Iranian role in Syria was to defend the country from being overrun by Al Qaeda, ISIS and Kurdish separatist terror groups. The job was done and eventually Assad scaped to Russia like a coward. I would say that Iranian mission in Syria was almost successful. The only failure was JewLani's control over Syria which was thanks to Turkey's support for that Takfiri element.

And yes, KSA's oil infrastructures are all legitimate targets for backing USA financially.

You “debunked” Madaya by posting photos taken after the siege? Human Rights Watch spoke to residents and doctors during it. They reported that Syrian govt and Hezbollah forces surrounded the town, blocked aid, and people were dying of starvation. Photos of people going home later do not answer that.

You say Iran went to Syria to fight ISIS. Fine, but that does not erase what Iran helped Assad do to civilians opposing his tyrany . And calling the mission 'almost successful" when Assad fled to Russia is quite something.

Your Saudi argument is even worse. saying it is a legitimate target simply because KSA supports the US. Apply that rule to Pakistan then. iran gave India access to Chabahar,gave india discounted oil, backing it financially (Your Logic ) . and Pakistan has accused & provided proof of Indian operatives linked to Iran of terrorist activities in Balochistan & KPK, & also indian attack on civilian sites in Pakistan recently, does that make everything in Iran a legitimate target for Pakistan? ( as it financially helped india) Of course you would scream if someone said that.

A country having ties with your enemy does not give you a free pass to attack whatever you want. Your rule only seems to work when the target is Saudi Arabia.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

2+2 = 5 ..
Prove it's wrong.

look another 'educate' mind, telling you 2+2 = 5
will probably go over your sectarian (illiterate and ignorant!) head (in other words he will soon become cryptic journo with shia soft corner in his head!)

 

[muhammed45]

You “debunked” Madaya by posting photos taken after the siege? Human Rights Watch spoke to residents and doctors during it. They reported that Syrian govt and Hezbollah forces surrounded the town, blocked aid, and people were dying of starvation. Photos of people going home later do not answer that.

You say Iran went to Syria to fight ISIS. Fine, but that does not erase what Iran helped Assad do to civilians opposing his tyrany . And calling the mission 'almost successful" when Assad fled to Russia is quite something.

Your Saudi argument is even worse. saying it is a legitimate target simply because KSA supports the US. Apply that rule to Pakistan then. iran gave India access to Chabahar,gave india discounted oil, backing it financially (Your Logic ) . and Pakistan has accused & provided proof of Indian operatives linked to Iran of terrorist activities in Balochistan & KPK, & also indian attack on civilian sites in Pakistan recently, does that make everything in Iran a legitimate target for Pakistan? ( as it financially helped india) Of course you would scream if someone said that.

A country having ties with your enemy does not give you a free pass to attack whatever you want. Your rule only seems to work when the target is Saudi Arabia.

My proof was solid, yours was someone said something. No i don't believe the words of terrorists and their western supporters.

And i believe Iran's economic ties with India doesn't have strategic aspect. Iran doesn't support Indian petro dollar. India was just a random investor in Chabahar that after US intervention disappeared from that economic hub.

India is not Iran's puppet nor is Iran the Indian puppet regime. Totally illogical comparison.

Terrorists had also crossed Pakistani borders and attacked Iranian border guards, in a few cases, they even kidnapped Iranian border guards. It doesn't make Pakistan a US puppet all of a sudden.

 

[muhammed45]

The Houthis of today are letting the "Israeli" ships, both civilian and military, to use Bab Al-Mandab when they blockade the Saudi ships. The Houthis of today are proxies for Emiratis - who are, in turn, a proxy for the Zionists. And their recent seizure of this strait was facilitated by the Emirati Zionists. That fact needs to be understood.

Surely not. That is not the reason as you tried to portray.

UAE is small, lacks strategic depth and is vulnerable to missile attacks. Yemen hit a spot near their nuclear reactor. UAE was also competing with Sauds in Yemen. Both these reasons led to kicking UAE out of Yemen.

Step by step, Yemen will limit Bab el Mandab too.

 

[F.O.X]

My proof was solid, yours was someone said something. No i don't believe the words of terrorists and their western supporters.

And i believe Iran's economic ties with India doesn't have strategic aspect. Iran doesn't support Indian petro dollar. India was just a random investor in Chabahar that after US intervention disappeared from that economic hub.

India is not Iran's puppet nor is Iran the Indian puppet regime. Totally illogical comparison.

Terrorists had also crossed Pakistani borders and attacked Iranian border guards, in a few cases, they even kidnapped Iranian border guards. It doesn't make Pakistan a US puppet all of a sudden.

Your ''solid proof'' is photos taken after the siege. Human Rights Watch spoke to residents and doctors while it was happening. They reported that Syrian govt and Hezbollah forces surrounded Madaya and blocked aid. Photos of people going home later dont answer that.

regarding terrorists crossing from Pakistan into Iran . Did Pakistan give Israel or the US a port to operate from? No. Iran gave India access to Chabahar, and india used the same chahbhar to Kill civilians in my country. so spare me the BS. I do not believe for a second that Tehran had no idea what India was doing on its soil. If you want to dismiss that as nothing, then stop calling Saudi oil a legitimate target just because KSA has ties with the US.

My question remains the same..... if KSA’s financial ties with the US make all Saudi oil facilities legitimate targets, would you accept the same rule being applied to Iran over its ties with India? Of course you wouldn't. That rule only works when the target is KSA.