NGAD IS THE BEST
Elite Member
Because you have no PROOFS/EVIDENCE that MORE THAN ONE PROTOTYPES OF J-20 IS EQUIPPED WITH WS-15It is hopeless talking to a wall! I end it here!
SORRY TO SAY DUDE YOUR MENTAL DISABILITY HAS NO CURE
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because you have no PROOFS/EVIDENCE that MORE THAN ONE PROTOTYPES OF J-20 IS EQUIPPED WITH WS-15It is hopeless talking to a wall! I end it here!
Copy no 6, are you illiterate and can't readBecause you have no PROOFS/EVIDENCE that MORE THAN ONE PROTOTYPES OF J-20 IS EQUIPPED WITH WS-15
SORRY TO SAY DUDE YOUR MENTAL DISABILITY HAS NO CURE
Copy no 6, are you illiterate and can't read
Copy no 6, are you illiterate and can't read
China’s J-20 Flying in ‘Beast Mode’ Again with Eight Air-to-Air Missiles
Published on: September 29, 2025 at 9:50 PM
View attachment 150353
The question you raised is very tricky. The 112 Factory has very high requirements for confidentiality. Now there is basically no clear photo of the J-20 airport. Even the J-20 No. 2052 had a clear photo only a year after its first flight.Because you have no PROOFS/EVIDENCE that MORE THAN ONE PROTOTYPES OF J-20 IS EQUIPPED WITH WS-15
SORRY TO SAY DUDE YOUR MENTAL DISABILITY HAS NO CURE


The question you raised is very tricky. The 112 Factory has very high requirements for confidentiality. Now there is basically no clear photo of the J-20 airport. Even the J-20 No. 2052 had a clear photo only a year after its first flight.
View attachment 151335
Currently, the only J-20 fighters confirmed to use WS-15 are No. 2051, No. 2052 and No. 2055.
View attachment 151336
My understanding is that the PLAAF intends to use the WS-15 as the J20A (let's call it that)Some prototypes will test radar and avionics, such as No. 2053, and some will test WS-15, such as No. 2052.In order to ensure the attendance rate, No. 2053 must choose the old WS-10C as the power source.Since when are 51 & 55 confirmed when we have no Images showing the exhausts?
The YF-23 was soo far ahead of its time, it is crazy to think about it now. What flew was a prototype and the cost of taking that design and moving it to operational use is cost prohibitive given that all the manufacturing is gone, and the engine itself would pose problems.
The Tempest/GCAP is considered to be a derivative of the YF-23 design with adjustments for longer range that Japan requires. the Americans could always buy the design once it is complete, or buy off the shelf ( there would be no desire by the GCAP partners to add USA at this stage as it would completely derail the entire programme ).
Does America’s edge in stealth, design brilliance, and raw performance still matter? Or is it being drowned out by China’s growing mastery of scale, integration, and doctrine?
Lol, keep believing thatIts funny the american still believe they have an edge over China in raw performance and stealth, a F-23 still have the range issues of F-22, a little bit better maybe, but nothing change the outcome in East Asia threate, and what a modified F-23 will be up against is probably J-36/J-50/high-end CCAs and UAVs/super-long range hypersonic anti-air missiles (like CJ1000 which China show in Sept. 3), instead of just J-20s.
I guess everyone have an edge until a PL/CJ/HQ catches them.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.