China does not recognize so-called 'Arunachal Pradesh' illegally set up by India, says spokesperson

[Nimble]

Not

The warning power strikes again. You think you can invade a treacherous mountainous slope with deep forests, at least the Russians had flat plains despite losing half million Russians in the meat grinder. They could at least see the drones coming at them.

to mention Arunachal Pradesh population hates China....

 

[MH.Yang]

Not
to mention Arunachal Pradesh population hates China....

PDF used to have a large number of people from the northeastern states of India, for example, I remember there was someone from Manipur. There are more Indians of X from Northeast India. We know very well whether they prefer China or India. You don't need to keep lying.

 

[Nimble]

Time is on our side, we are not in a hurry. And the annual deficit of hundreds of billions of dollars is equivalent to every Indian paying us a tribute of $100. As far as I know, the tax revenue of that place is only $300 million per year, while the government's fiscal expenditure is $4.2 billion per year.

We have time to wait for the fruit to ripen. Because it is contrary to India's fantasy, the power gap between the two countries is widening.

Nice dreams..... you had a time actually till 1986 before India merged Arunachal Pradesh in Indian union.... you lost it and now we won't give you another chance....

 

[MH.Yang]

Nice dreams..... you had a time actually till 1986 before India merged Arunachal Pradesh in Indian union.... you lost it and now we won't give you another chance....

It's not your the final say. I don't think Indians have the ability to stop the pace of the Chinese, not even your master, the Anglo Saxon, can do it.

Since 1949, almost all of our plans have been realized, while almost all of your plans have failed, haven't they? I don't know why you still have the confidence to say that to Chinese people.

 

[MH.Yang]

Arunachal Pradesh people do not like China.... period.... I don't need to lie I gad seen this even jn 1 Australian documentary.... if I remember the name or find it will surely share....

That's ridiculous, an Australian documentary. What is the use of documentaries made for politics and business. Why don't you just go to X and check the accounts of people from Northeast India?

Or is your cowardly heart implying that you must stand with your Anglo Saxon master in order to face me, a Chinese?

 

[MH.Yang]

Stop boasting over a wars that were fought in 50s and 60s..... India was ruled by idiot Nehru who didn't even actually wanted India to have an army......

Think of the parity with Ukraine Russia.... here you have to face a mammoth military in one of the most toughest terrain not to mention drones, loitering munitions have made the life further miserable......

I don't know why you still have the confidence to say that to Indian people.

You really don’t understand China at all.

You should carefully study the conflicts between China VS the UK in 1949, China VS the U.S. in 1950, China VS France in 1951, China VS India in 1962, China VS the USSR in 1969, and China VS Vietnam in 1979.

China never occupies any enemy territory, and China never wages counterinsurgency warfare. We will destroy all of the enemy’s factories, roads, ports, and homes, and contaminate all farmland, water sources, and forests, then withdraw back to our own territory. We will not occupy India; instead, we will contaminate your water sources and farmland with heavy-metal bombs, letting starvation kill you. We will destroy your central government and any forces capable of unifying all of India, allowing civil war to destroy you. We are a homogeneous nation of the same ethnicity with common interests, and you are not. We have a war advantage that you can never obtain.

China has not entered a state of war for forty years, not because Chinese people fear war, but because no country dares to let China enter a state of war. After the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949, we have already defeated all P5 countries of the United Nations, including ourselves. Just because we don't show our teeth doesn't mean we're a non biting rabbit. China's war thinking is also different from that of Western countries. In Chinese history, there were many powerful neighbors, such as the Guifang, Xianbei, Xiongnu, Khitan, and so on. Why have they all disappeared from the surrounding areas of China? Because although China's war mentality dislikes occupying grasslands, it can make them unsuitable for their habitation.

 

[Yasser76]

Not
to mention Arunachal Pradesh population hates China....

Indians would sell their mothers for a Chinese passport, what the f**k you on about Rakesh!?

 

[RocketLaw]

 

[Panda_Hi]

▲▲▲Thank you for your reply...






Since I can’t understand the language used in the video, I asked Grok to help analyze its content and add some related news.

Grok’s response is as follows:

---

█ 這篇X發文（@suryaupse，2026年10月24日）在說什麼？
█ What is this X post (@suryaupse, October 24, 2026) saying?

發文文字很簡短：「Why is no one talking about Arunachal Pradesh?」（為什麼沒有人在談論阿魯納恰爾邦？）
The post text is very short: “Why is no one talking about Arunachal Pradesh?”

它附上一支約2分鐘的影片，旨在引起外界對阿魯納恰爾邦（Arunachal Pradesh）近期事件的關注。當時該邦（尤其是Siang、Upper Siang與East Siang地區）正發生反對「Siang Upper Multipurpose Project」（SUMP，擬建約11,200 MW的大型多用途水電大壩）的抗議活動。
It attaches an approximately 2-minute video intended to draw public attention to recent events in Arunachal Pradesh. At the time, the state (especially the Siang, Upper Siang, and East Siang regions) was experiencing protests against the “Siang Upper Multipurpose Project” (SUMP), a proposed large multipurpose hydropower dam of about 11,200 MW.

Activists detained, 4 hurt in clashes in Arunachal dam protest; CM urges dialogue​

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/sto...women-injured-police-clash-3023976-2026-10-24

█ 影片內容在說什麼？
█ What is the content of the attached video?

影片主角是一名當地內容創作者／評論者（新聞中多稱為Aiko Maam），她在夜間、情緒激動且流淚的情況下自拍說話。她強調自己是以「平民」而非記者身分發言，地點在East Siang的Pasighat。她表示武裝部隊（警察／安全部隊）對Gen-Z抗議者（年輕人／孩子）發射催淚瓦斯（tear gas），自己眼睛灼痛、呼吸困難，身邊朋友也無法正常呼吸。她質問「這是什麼樣的回應？如果有人因為催淚瓦斯出問題，誰要負責？」並批評對年輕人使用這種手段很危險。
The main speaker in the video is a local content creator/commentator (often referred to in news reports as Aiko Maam). She is filming herself at night, emotionally distressed and in tears. She emphasizes that she is speaking as a “civilian” rather than a reporter, and that she is in Pasighat, East Siang. She states that the armed forces (police/security personnel) fired tear gas at Gen-Z protesters (young people/kids). Her eyes are burning and she is having difficulty breathing; her friend nearby also cannot breathe properly. She questions, “What kind of response is this? If something happens to anyone because of the tear gas, who will take responsibility?” and criticizes the use of such measures against young people as very dangerous.

影片後半段切換到夜間街頭畫面：煙霧瀰漫、人群聚集、車輛與建築物附近有煙火／騷亂跡象，呈現抗議現場的緊張與混亂氣氛。
The second half of the video switches to nighttime street scenes: thick smoke, crowds gathering, and signs of fire/unrest near vehicles and buildings, conveying the tense and chaotic atmosphere at the protest site.

Arunachal: Pasighat Tense; Police Station, NHPC Office Torched Amid Protests​

https://www.pratidintime.com/north-...ng-project-protest-pasighat-violence-12744598

█ 背景事件（根據多家印度媒體報導）：
█ Background events (based on multiple Indian media reports):

◉ 2026年10月23日，多個地方組織發起12小時bandh（罷市／罷工），反對大壩計畫（擔心淹沒村莊、影響原住民Adi部落權益、生態與生計）。
◉ On October 23, 2026, several local organizations called a 12-hour bandh (shutdown/strike) to oppose the dam project (fears of villages being submerged, impacts on indigenous Adi tribal rights, ecology, and livelihoods).

◉ 警方與抗議者發生衝突，警方發射催淚瓦斯驅散群眾，至少有數名女性受傷送醫。
◉ Clashes broke out between police and protesters; police fired tear gas to disperse the crowd, and at least several women were injured and taken to hospital.

◉ 當晚在Pasighat，抗議升級為暴力：抗議者燒毀NHPC辦公室、派出所、多輛警車，並破壞多名政治人物（包括BJP州主席與MLA）的住宅。警方與官員也有人受傷。
◉ That night in Pasighat, the protests escalated into violence: protesters set fire to the NHPC office, a police station, and multiple police vehicles, and vandalized the residences of several politicians (including the state BJP president and MLAs). Police and officials were also injured.

█ 留言都在說些什麼？（目前約165則回覆）
█ What are the comments saying? (Currently about 165 replies)

留言整體呈現強烈情緒與兩極化討論，主要方向包括：
The comments overall show strong emotions and polarized discussion. The main directions include:

◉ 批評政府與警方：許多人譴責「用武器和化學品（催淚瓦斯）攻擊公民」，認為若公民自衛反擊就會被關，這是「獨裁地獄」。有人直接點名批評莫迪政府（@narendramodi），並說「他們沒勇氣對抗中國，卻選擇攻擊自己的公民」。
◉ Criticism of the government and police: Many people condemn “attacking citizens with weapons and chemicals (tear gas),” arguing that if citizens retaliate in self-defense they get jailed, calling it a “hellhole of dictatorship.” Some directly criticize the Modi government (@narendramodi) and say “They don’t have the courage to stand up to China, so instead they choose to attack their own citizens.”

◉ 媒體與關注度問題：不少人呼應原帖，認為東北地區（尤其是阿魯納恰爾）與印度本土「切斷」，新聞容易被操控或忽視，主流媒體沒報導才會「沒人談論」。
◉ Media and attention issues: Quite a few people echo the original post, arguing that the Northeast (especially Arunachal) is “cut off” from mainland India, making news easy to manipulate or ignore, and that mainstream media silence is why “no one is talking about it.”

◉ 對催淚瓦斯的討論：有人質疑「催淚瓦斯算化學武器嗎？」或嘲諷過度解讀；也有人憤怒「為什麼對平民用這種化學品」。
◉ Discussion of tear gas: Some question “Is tear gas considered a chemical weapon?” or mock over-interpretation; others express anger at “why such chemicals are used against civilians.”

◉ 其他觀點：少數留言涉及地緣政治（例如與中國、大壩戰略意義相關）、質疑抗議者是否完全和平，或進行政治攻訐（支持／反對特定政黨）。
◉ Other views: A minority of comments touch on geopolitics (e.g., related to China or the strategic significance of the dam), question whether the protesters were entirely peaceful, or engage in political attacks (supporting or opposing specific parties).

總結來說，留言以對警方行動的憤怒、對媒體沉默的質疑，以及對東北議題被忽視的不滿為主，夾雜政治攻防。事件本身仍在發展中，官方呼籲對話與和平，同時也有人指出抗議後期出現暴力與破壞。
In summary, the comments are mainly driven by anger at the police action, skepticism about media silence, and dissatisfaction that Northeast issues are being ignored, mixed with political attacks. The situation itself is still developing; officials have called for dialogue and peace, while others have pointed out that violence and destruction occurred in the later stages of the protests.

 

[Feroze]

Arunachal Pradesh which is really South Tibet.

China has a valid claim on South Tibet, as South Tibet was part of Qing China and never part of British India.

 

[Panda_Hi]

Arunachal Pradesh which is really South Tibet.

China has a valid claim on South Tibet, as South Tibet was part of Qing China and never part of British India.View attachment 220689

The woman in the video (#23) doesn’t look Indian. She looks more like a Chinese person.