China hits back at Canada with fresh agriculture tariffs

US cannot unilaterally back out of international postal agreements. Well, it can, but the ripple effects would reverberate.
They shouldn't stop the service to begin with, they should have increase the excise duty if that is the reason why they try to stop it in the first place. It's like here in Oz, we used to have a A$1000 tax free duty to escape GST (Anything you ship under $1000 is tax free), and now everything imported incurred a 10% GST to offset the tax.
 
They shouldn't stop the service to begin with, they should have increase the excise duty if that is the reason why they try to stop it in the first place. It's like here in Oz, we used to have a A$1000 tax free duty to escape GST (Anything you ship under $1000 is tax free), and now everything imported incurred a 10% GST to offset the tax.

There's a little nuance here when it comes to who is collecting the money. If it is an Australian version of Amazon they collect the money and pay it to the government. If it is Alibaba then the Australian government has to chase them down.
 
They shouldn't stop the service to begin with, they should have increase the excise duty if that is the reason why they try to stop it in the first place. It's like here in Oz, we used to have a A$1000 tax free duty to escape GST (Anything you ship under $1000 is tax free), and now everything imported incurred a 10% GST to offset the tax.

I think the postage costs are based on the costs in the source country. They will charge more for the same package coming from UK v/s Pakistan because people in UK pay more for all postage compared to people in Pakistan. So China needs to be put into a higher cost category.
 
China was unprepared for Trump's trade war in 2018, but now China's position is world's apart from where it was 7 years ago.
 
China was unprepared for Trump's trade war in 2018, but now China's position is world's apart from where it was 7 years ago.

Always be prepared is the name of the game.
 
There's a little nuance here when it comes to who is collecting the money. If it is an Australian version of Amazon they collect the money and pay it to the government. If it is Alibaba then the Australian government has to chase them down.
Well, it wasn't the government that chase them down. Australia Post is not operated by the Government as opposed to USPS.

It used to be when you receive a parcel, if the declaration value of said parcel is over A$1000, then you are send a notice to collect the parcel and you will have to pay the excise duty before you can collect it from the Post Office, and if the sender claim the parcel is less than A$1000 but the Custom look at it (either by random inspection or targeted inspection) then you will need to pay a fine and the excise duty from the post office

Now it is paid on the declaration ends, say if I buy something from overseas, then they are required to pay the excise duty at post, that's why if I buy stuff from Ebay from the US or UK, they will add the GST in the final purchase amount.
 
I think the postage costs are based on the costs in the source country. They will charge more for the same package coming from UK v/s Pakistan because people in UK pay more for all postage compared to people in Pakistan. So China needs to be put into a higher cost category.
I think postage are determined by zone. China (or Pakistan) are in a similar zone and UK and US are in similar Zone because of their geographical location and proximity from us.

Another issue is Chinese Government have a policy to subsidize China Post, which mean the postage they charge to Australia is almost certainly lower than any other country in the same Zone.

The issue here is not the postage tho, the issue here is the excise duty (at least this is what they say) because like Australia, US have a tax free threshold of anything under $800 is duty free. China can charge postage lower to post to US, that's up to them, but if this is going to be duty free, then it would have been unfair to the general merchandiser in the US because they (Shein et el) don't pay tax to the US for anything they had sold. While retail like Nordstrom or Macy did. So there are going to be an advantage from Chinese retailer if they exploit this duty free loophole.
 
There are two issues at play here. One being the duty-free loophole, the other being loophole which allows the shipper to consolidate a number of low-value shipments into a single container and still qualify for subsidized rates due to the volume and tender method. In essence, "junk mail" rates.
 

China Has Prepared For a Bigger Trade War​

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Well, put Chinese imports and American goods side by side in a shop and see what people want to buy.

I have seen people buying Midea heat pumps and air conditioners over ones from GE and Lennox. Neither GE nor Lennox have done any upgrade or R&D in over 30 years. They are still making units for MASSIVE homes which are no longer common in bigger cities. None of them make units for apartments very common now.

And funniest of all is when even those GE and Lennoxes are made in China.
 
You need to stop commenting and try to keep up with all the changes going on.

We are entering the biggest trade shock in over 50 years.

Dude, you can love America and I admire you for wanting to protect the White heritage but you need to wake up and realise the reality of how far ahead China really is. If you don't knw your enemy, you can't beat them. China produces, low, mid and high end stuff, you pay the right price, you get the right stuff. Once you realise this, then you can counter us. Wake up!
 
When China's economy becomes as large as USA's economy then I will take China seriously. I am waiting for that day
 
When China's economy becomes as large as USA's economy then I will take China seriously. I am waiting for that day
Well, if you count by energy produced, shipping tonnage etc, they are already ahead.
 

China Has Prepared For a Bigger Trade War​

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


It's Confucius v/s Confused.

China's planning horizon is four decades, Trump's is four hours.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top