Chinese 6th Generation Aircraft News & Discussions

[Yommie]

What we can learn about China's J-36 (from America's FB-22)​

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Yommie]

Meet the J-36: China's Sixth-Generation Fighter Jet That Threatens US Air Dominance​

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Yommie]

China’s J-36 Stealth Aircraft: A Fighter, A Bomber, or Both?

China’s J-36 stealth aircraft blurs the lines between fighter and bomber, boasting high-speed, long-range capabilities. Is it a multi-role game changer, or a failed compromise?

www.19fortyfive.com

 

[Yommie]

@NGAD IS THE BEST

Personally, I think J-36 is a good candidate for phasing out the aging JH-7 while J-50 may be a better choice for phasing out the Flankers. What do you think?

 

[NGAD IS THE BEST]

@NGAD IS THE BEST

Personally, I think J-36 is a good candidate for phasing out the aging JH-7 while J-50 may be a better choice for phasing out the Flankers. What do you think?

J36 will replace J20 not jh-7 and j50 will replace J35 not Flankers lol

 

[CSAW]

 

[Yommie]

J36 will replace J20 not jh-7 and j50 will replace J35 not Flankers lol

IMO J-50 replace Flankers considering both are built by Shenyang. J-36 is bigger and more suited to the bomber role and is better for replacing JH-7.

 

[Deino]

IMO J-50 replace Flankers considering both are built by Shenyang. J-36 is bigger and more suited to the bomber role and is better for replacing JH-7.

Once again ... there is nothing like a one on one successor or replacement especially not the J-36. It is something totally different!

 

[NGAD IS THE BEST]

IMO J-50 replace Flankers considering both are built by Shenyang. J-36 is bigger and more suited to the bomber role and is better for replacing JH-7.

there is no replacement of JH-7 on the horizon so far, and J-36 is not for replacing JH-7, in fact there is no need to replace single mission capable JH-7

 

[CSAW]

 

[iblini]

View attachment 99121

CG...

 

[Yommie]

there is no replacement of JH-7 on the horizon so far, and J-36 is not for replacing JH-7, in fact there is no need to replace single mission capable JH-7

JH-7 is like F-111 and Tornado. It's not that versatile. Future combat jets must be multirole. Both J-36 and J-50 are fully multirole. They can do air to air as well as they can do air to surface.

 

[NGAD IS THE BEST]

JH-7 is like F-111 and Tornado. It's not that versatile. Future combat jets must be multirole. Both J-36 and J-50 are fully multirole. They can do air to air as well as they can do air to surface.

so, what's your point?

 

[xiao]

so, what's your point?

What he meant might be that the J36 might be able to perform a similar mission to the Jh7 to some extent, such as striking at sea

 

[NGAD IS THE BEST]

What he meant might be that the J36 might be able to perform a similar mission to the Jh7 to some extent, such as striking at sea

J36 will do anti-ship missions better than JH-7 dude