Chinese 6th Generation Aircraft News & Discussions

@NGAD IS THE BEST

Which one looks better? I'm going with J-36.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Yommie said:
@NGAD IS THE BEST

Which one looks better? I'm going with J-36.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

Both looking awesome but I'm going with J50 it's more sleeker and unorthodox design compared to J36
 
NGAD IS THE BEST said:
Both looking awesome but I'm going with J50 it's more sleeker and unorthodox design compared to J36
Click to expand...

J-50 is more conventional. J-50 is the modern day P-40 Warhawk. J-36 is more innovative. J-36 is the modern day P-39 Airacobra.
 
Yommie said:
J-50 is more conventional. J-50 is the modern day P-40 Warhawk. J-36 is more innovative. J-36 is the modern day P-39 Airacobra.
Click to expand...
No tell me which jet has lambda wing configuration? J-36 is having more conventional delta wing design? So tell me which one is a unorthodox design J-36 or J50?
 
NGAD IS THE BEST said:
No tell me which jet has lambda wing configuration? J-36 is having more conventional delta wing design? So tell me which one is a unorthodox design J-36 or J50?
Click to expand...

J-36 has three engines with the third intake behind the canopy. This is reminiscent of P-39's innovative design which has engine behind the canopy.
 
Yommie said:
J-36 has three engines with the third intake behind the canopy. This is reminiscent of P-39's innovative design which has engine behind the canopy.
Click to expand...
No unusual we had have experimental jets from that have had air intake on behind the canopy, but do you see any production jet that had have lambda wing configuration in past?

May be J36 is more advanced then J50 in terms of avionics/AESA and flight control software to compensate 3rd engine but J50 is more unorthodox than J36 and its flight control software is also unique to compensate drop down wings to have a better maneuverability/agility and low speed handling compare to J36
 
NGAD IS THE BEST said:
No unusual we had have experimental jets from that have had air intake on behind the canopy, but do you see any production jet that had have lambda wing configuration in past?

May be J36 is more advanced then J50 in terms of avionics/AESA and flight control software to compensate 3rd engine but J50 is more unorthodox than J36 and its flight control software is also unique to compensate drop down wings to have a better maneuverability/agility and low speed handling compare to J36
Click to expand...

J-36 is more unusual in design than J-50. J-50 is more like Tempest sans the tails.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Yommie said:
J-36 is more unusual in design than J-50. J-50 is more like Tempest sans the tails.
Click to expand...
Tempest design is gone, they are working with Japanese and Italian companies to built GCAP which have delta wings

Lets agree to disagree you like J36 design more unique than J50 good for you but in my point of view J50 is more unique than J36

And last if you delete upper intake of J36 then it will become conventional delta wing design similar to GCAP
 
Bilal said:
Third 6th Gen aircraft?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...


Makes sense. J-50 be modern day P-40. J-36 be modern day P-39. This be modern day F4F.

What do you think? @NGAD IS THE BEST
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top