Covid-19 News and Discussions


Idaho Statesman

Idaho has ‘very high’ levels of COVID in wastewater. Our weather may be making it worse​

Angela Palermo
Sat, August 3, 2024 at 6:00 a.m. GMT-4·3 min read

2df319058b621a6ff61da4d33062a8c8

Boise is seeing the highest levels of COVID-19 in its wastewater since a big spike in January.

The surge follows a nationwide trend as cases creep up across the country. Infection rates in Idaho have been steadily rising since May, prompting some concern from public health officials as people travel for vacations and gather for summertime barbecues and other events.

Recording-breaking heat and wildfire smoke has also swamped the Treasure Valley for weeks, driving residents indoors and into air-conditioned, smoke-free spaces.


Deputy State Epidemiologist Dr. Kathryn Turner said the weather may have contributed to the rise in COVID-19 cases.

“Obviously people are gathering a lot in the summer,” Turner said. “The other thing is that when it gets real hot, we all go inside, and we’re breathing each other’s air. That’s a really good way to spread the virus. It’s also hard right now because of the air quality. Of course, one of the precautions we always tell people if they want to avoid transmission is to get a lot of fresh air, be outside, that sort of thing.”

But when the temperatures soar into the triple digits for days at a time — as they did again starting on Friday with highs forecast mostly in the 100s through at least Tuesday — and when the air quality dips because of the wildfire smoke shrouding the skies, it’s hard to find an opportunity to get fresh air.

Turner said that while Boise typically sees a bump in cases in the summer, transmission of the virus appears to be higher this time around.

The city’s wastewater dashboard reflects that. Samples taken from the city’s two sewage treatment plants show a steady increase in COVID-19 spread since April, reaching levels not seen since early January. The city of Boise treats wastewater for itself, Garden City and Eagle.

Statewide, Idaho has “very high” levels the the virus in its wastewater, according to estimates published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“The good news is that we’re not seeing a huge spike in emergency-department visits or some of those other measures of severity,” Turner told the Idaho Statesman by phone. “So far, most of the infections seem to be milder. But I have heard that some people who had been infected previously report that their symptoms are not as mild as they were the last time they got infected.”

There has been a small uptick in COVID-19-related emergency-room visits, she said.

She said public health officials have noticed waning immunity as fewer people get updated vaccine shots and as the virus evolves. She said early this fall is a good time to get the vaccine.

The CDC recommended in late June that people age 6 months and older get the 2024-25 COVID-19 vaccine, which is expected to become available later in August or in September. The CDC said some 2023-24 COVID-19 vaccines will expire this summer.

“It’s not really a booster,” Turner said. “It’s becoming kind of like your flu shot — you know, you get it every year. We’re moving in that direction with regard to COVID-19 vaccines. I think we can expect to see an annual shot that is formulated specifically to what is circulating.”

Brain fog, fatigue and fear of crowds. Boise residents share about post-pandemic life

COVID-19 is surging. Time to mask up or get a booster? What a Boise medical expert says

Are Idaho’s rural hospitals on the brink of collapse? What medical leaders are saying
 

The Indomitable Covid Virus​

How to respond without denialism or complacency​

ERIC TOPOL
AUG 03, 2024

It’s a major wave now, with an estimated new 900,000 infections per day, as my friend Jay Weiland estimated based on the 2 sources of US wastewater data (definitely worth following him at X or Threads). The slope of rise of SARS-CoV-2 levels is still steep, so we haven’t yet reached the plateau. It’s already towered beyond 4 prior waves of the US pandemic.


Share Ground Truths

State-of-the-Wave​

It’s related to the variants KP.3 and KP.3.1.1, which together now account for more than half of new cases in the US. And KP.3.1.1 is on the move, overtaking KP.3 as shown by the new CDC data below. A big jump in the past 2 weeks.




We’ve known about the decided growth advantage of the KP.3 and KP.3.1.1 variants for many months. Back in April I wrote here about the concerns over a new wave indexed to these FLiRT variants derived from JN.1 that hit us hard last winter. The FLiRT acronym comes from the new mutations F456L and R346T that showed up in KP.2, as seen at left below. (S-spike, ORF-open reading frame). But note below, it’s no longer FLiRT, since KP.3 does not have the R346T mutation. Instead there’s the Q493E mutation in KP.3 and, added to that, the S31 deletion in KP.3.1.1. The Sato Lab in Japan recently characterized KP.3.1.1, as having the most immune evasion and infectivity of any of the variants derived from and including JN.1. And previously Ben Murrell showed clearly (below, right) KP.3.1.1 had the most prominent growth advantage of all circulating variants out there. No surprise it is rapidly rising to dominance here and elsewhere around the world.


Fortunately, the rise in levels of the virus, still going up in all 4 major US regions (most recent CDC data below) has not been linked with as much severe Covid (absolute increase) as was seen in prior waves, but compared to last week there was a relative increase of 25% of deaths and 12% increase in emergency room visits due to Covid. No matter how you look at it, this is not a benign wave, folks.


Moreover, besides people getting sick from Covid, typically now from a recurrent bout (often 3rd or more), there will be more people developing Long Covid, as Ziyad Al-Aly and colleagues recently published—less new cases of Long Covid but still a risk, especially in unvaccinated individuals.

Why is this happening?​

The virus is relentlessly evolving, getting further and further away as an antigen (how our immune system “sees” the virus) than the strains of virus in the early years of the pandemic. The antigenic distance map below reflects that evolution. JN.1 is further way from the infamous Omicron BA.1 than BA.1 is from the major variants of 2020 and 2021 (Wuhan-ancestral, D614G, Alpha, Delta, Beta). KP.3 and KP.3.1.1. is to the right of JN.1 (not shown), even further away. The virus will not stop here, despite our desire to will it way. It will continue to find new ways to infect and reinfect us, under selection pressure from our prior immunity (be it infections, vaccinations, or combinations). We may also see another “Omicron-like event” in the times ahead, with a profoundly altered virus spike, tens of new mutations, as seen with BA.1 and BA.2.86 (the latter eventually led to JN.1)


Added to problem of the virus‘s evolution and, as a result, is the blunting of our immune response, the big issue of waning immunity. The vaccine boosters only last 4-6 months for protection from severe Covid, do little after early weeks for any protection from infections or spread. The same goes for infections. Neutralizing antibody levels go down. Our interferon first line of defense gets blocked (Shane Crotty called this the “superpower of SARS-CoV-2” in our podcast this week). The virus evolves and, at the same time, our immune response wanes. That’s not a good combination.

The other feature that promotes the virus is our complete let down of mitigation that we know (despite misinformation and disinformation) works. Few people are masking. Little has been done to improve air quality or ventilation. Indoor events are being held with big crowds, making believe that the virus has gone away. It hasn’t. It won’t.

What Can We Do About It?​

Covid is not like Flu for an annual shot

For convenience, and opposed to all the data, the FDA has tried to force fit Covid to be like Flu and that’s wrong. It doesn’t take a genius to see we have 2 major waves each year and, for high-risk individuals, semiannual (every 6 months) shots will be needed for protection. And those shots have to be aligned with the strain of the virus.

We knew about KP.3 lurking in March but didn’t have the FDA Advisory Committee meeting until June, at which time it was decided the KP.2 booster vaccine (Pfizer, Moderna) would be the way to go, and JN.1 from Novavax. That meeting should have taken place in April, at the latest, and a new booster would have been available in about 90 days. This is all happening because of the wrong read on Covid being like seasonal flu.

What about right now?

The new KP.2 boosters will not be ready until the first week of September. It isn’t clear about the timing of availability for the JN.1 shots from Novavax which the company announced at the June FDA meeting would be ready in August. Most likely all 3 will be rolled out the first week of September. The match up of KP.2 (vs KP.3.1.1) is clearly better than JN.1, but some people prefer Novavax with its less acute phase side effects.

That’s still more than month away. The XBB.1.5 (old) booster is available and it will increase protection, so if you’re worried about making a trip or being exposed, it’s a reasonable strategy to get it. While suboptimal, the added level of protection afforded from that booster is useful.

Of course, it’s never just about vaccines. We are all cognizant of the various mitigation factors that help protection (if only we used them).

Longer Term Strategy​

Nasal Vaccines​

We have to get nasal vaccines into high gear to markedly reduce infections and spread. This week I did a Ground Truths podcast with Shane Crotty, one of the leading US immunologist and virologists, on his landmark paper in Nature. By doing nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs every month in 100 participants throughout a year of the pandemic, his team identified the determinants of nasal (mucosal) immunity, which we aren’t going to get from shots. He, like me and many others, including Akiko Iwasaki, remain quite optimistic we’ll get a successful nasal vaccine. That was reinforced by a report from the Washington University group that developed a nasal vaccine and licensed it to India (where it is approved and used). In hamsters, a widely used and accepted experimental SARS-CoV-2model, their nasal vaccine blocked spread. Besides blocking transmission, it reduced infectious virus titers ~100-fold and 100,000-fold in the upper and lower respiratory tract, respectively, of the primary contact following SARS-CoV-2 exposure. That did not occur with mRNA shots.

The investment of the US for Project NextGen has been minimal to develop nasal vaccines with only 2 programs supported and it’s moving quite slowly. I don’t understand why the Washington University nasal vaccine is not being assessed in the US, including regulatory guidance and oversight. And there are many other candidates from academic labs at Mt. Sinai, Emory ,Yale and others. What a missed opportunity.

More Durable, Universal (Pancoronavirus) Covid Vaccines​

Our vaccines have sat in stagnation since the miracle of their appearance and potency in late 2020. No change in nanoparticles to enhance the acute immune response or make it more durable. No willingness to get a self-amplifying vaccine here that uses far less mRNA, and already approved in Japan. Academic labs have identified more than 50 templates for a pan-betacoronavirus or pan-sarbecovirus vaccine but most of this work sits in high-tier peer review publications, not being used to get a variant-free vaccine tested. It’ll ultimately take longer than a nasal vaccine but we’re essentially in standstill mode with little investment in moving forward. How shortsighted this is. The funds available through Project NextGen certainly are inadequate to get this effort supported. The variants will keep coming and we’ll just keep chasing them, being months behind. We can and must do better than this!

Our best defense against Long Covid is not to get Covid. Our second best known defense is to be vaccinated. The better the vaccine, the less Long Covid risk.

Treatments for Long Covid​

Well over a billion US dollars that have been wasted (RECOVER) without clinical trials of very promising candidate drugs. Yesterday Bernie Sanders proposed a new moonshot fund of $1 billion per year for 10 years for dedicated Long Covid research.. That’s terrific but there are 2 problems. For one, it is highly unlikely to actually get funded, and we’ll have to wait until next year to see if a new Administration and Congress will be supportive. Until now, even the words “Long Covid” have not been uttered by the current President, no less definitive action to get treatments assessed. With millions of Americans suffering Long Covid, it would be politically wise to acknowledge this public health crisis and get all over it. Second, we have already seen how poorly the NIH did in deploying cumulatively about $1.5 billion for this purpose (and nothing to show for it), so I don’’t see how pouring more funds into a failed experiment makes sense. We need the funds and new efficient models for expeditiously testing repurposed or new drugs in large, rigorous clinical trials. With all we’ve learned about the pathophysiology, nicely reviewed this week by Trisha Greenhalgh and colleagues, we have the blueprints to run with this.
 

Meta-Analysis Finds Massive Failure of COVID-19 Vaccines to Stop SARS-CoV-2​

68 Studies Combined Demonstrates Lack of Theoretical Efficacy​


PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH
AUG 03, 2024

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

Virtually every vaccinated person I meet has contracted COVID-19. Many still believe vaccination was worth the risk because they did not end up in the hospital in 2021 through the present day. Vaccine-takers tended to be younger working age individuals who were mandated by work or school, and therefore healthier than those not forced into taking the jab. In my practice, the senior citizens who took the vaccine tended to be healthier and far more worried about COVID-19. They were the first to get early treatment for the illness. Finally, we all saw COVID-19 illness become far milder on the second, third, and fourth infections because of natural immunity as we were faced with milder strains. So in the midst of this confounded set of relationships, how did the COVID-19 vaccines perform?

Wu et al, published a meta-analysis of 68 studies evaluating efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination. Keep in mind only favorable studies were accepted by editors. The results indicate a stunning failure of vaccination. Because the data are not from high-quality, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials, and publication bias, we must be conservative and consider the lower-bound of the confidence interval as the statistic of interest. This means that vaccine performance could be as bad as that number.


Wu N, Joyal-Desmarais K, Ribeiro PAB, Vieira AM, Stojanovic J, Sanuade C, Yip D, Bacon SL. Long-term effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against infections, hospitalisations, and mortality in adults: findings from a rapid living systematic evidence synthesis and meta-analysis up to December, 2022. Lancet Respir Med. 2023 May;11(5):439-452. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00015-2. Epub 2023 Feb 10. PMID: 36780914; PMCID: PMC9917454.
As you can see, most lower bounds are near or below zero at 168-195 days! That means just a few months after the shot, there is no detectable benefit even in the most biased studies. Hospitalization and death as an outcome must be considerably discounted since there was not control for early treatment, natural immunity, and progressively milder strains before Omicron. After Omicron, there is no benefit whatsoever for vaccination for the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 or hospitalization/death.
 
@Sharma Ji

Link Between Covid Vaccine And Heart Attacks? Cardiologist & MP Dr CN Manjunath Explains​


 

Are YOU Experiencing A "Summer Cold?" Well It May Be COVID According to Toronto Doctors!​

 
@Sharma Ji


How Should Coronaphobia Be Conceptualized? Evaluating Competing Models of the COVID-19 Phobia Scale Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis​

Author links open overlay panelAndrew Lac

Abstract​

Coronaphobia represents the fears and phobias attributed to the COVID-19 virus and pandemic. The COVID-19 Phobia Scale, previously validated as a four-factor structure, is a widely used multidimensional measure to assess coronaphobia. The current study scrutinized various competing factor structures of this instrument to identify the optimal psychometric representation of coronaphobia. Adults (N = 412) ranging in age from 19 to 84 years completed the COVID-19 Phobia Scale. Several theoretically plausible factor structures of coronaphobia were tested and compared using confirmatory factor analysis: four-factor structure, one-factor structure, higher-order factor structure, and five-factor bifactor structure. The one-factor structure showing an overarching factor of COVID-19 phobia revealed the poorest fit. The five-factor bifactor structure that allowed every item to double-load on the COVID-19 general phobia factor alongside one of the COVID-19 specific phobia factors (psychological phobia, psycho-somatic phobia, economic phobia, or social phobia) produced the strongest fit indices and was superior to the widely accepted four-factor structure. The five-factor bifactor model demonstrated multi-group measurement invariance across gender, race, age, and state urbanization. Furthermore, the general phobia factor and the psycho-somatic phobia factor from the five-factor bifactor model uniquely predicted present moment state anxiety using structural equation modeling. This psychometric investigation underscores that coronaphobia is experienced as a general pandemic fear that is simultaneously experienced with specific domains of pandemic fears. Theoretical and methodological insights are offered for conceptualizing and measuring coronaphobia and understanding how pandemic phobias differ from traditional phobias.
 

Berlin: Thousands march in COVID-19 pandemic skeptic protest​

Richard Connor
14 hours ago
Thousands marched in Berlin to reprise demonstrations questioning government-imposed measures at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants also voiced opposition to Germany's push to rebuild its military.



Peace doves and peace signs can be seen on flags carried by protesters in Berlin
Protesters also voiced opposition against the German government's push to rebuild the country's military.Image: Carsten Koall/dpa/picture alliance
ADVERTISEMENT

Several thousand people on Saturday joined a street demonstration and rally in Berlin organized by Germany's "Lateral Thinking" protest movement.

The protest faction, best known for staging demonstrations against COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, was calling for a reassessment of government measures and "consequences for those responsible."

However, a large contingent also protested against the German government's push to rebuild the country's military.

How the protests unfolded​

The demonstration moved along the German capital's famous Kurfürstendamm shopping street toward Berlin-Tiergarten.

There, a stage had been set up for a "freedom, peace, joy" rally organized by the movement's initiator Michael Ballweg.

Many participants in the march protested against the policies of German Chancellor Olaf Scholz's center-left-led coalition government.

Some carried placards for the fringe political party The Basis, which is seen as aligned with the Lateral Thinking movement.

Among the statements on display was "Peace-ready, not war-ready," a reference to the statement by German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius that Germany must be prepared for conflict with Russia by 2029.

According to the Berlin police in the late afternoon, the demonstration and rally had been peaceful and without incident, there were no arrests.

However, there were several violations of the requirement not to display posters referring to the magazine "Compact," which Germany's domestic intelligence service had classified as right-wing extremist and which was subsequently banned.

Thousands of demonstrators protest near Berlin-Tiergarten
Thousands of demonstrators protest near Berlin-Tiergarten

Around 9,000 people took part in the protest in the German capital Image: Carsten Koall/dpa/picture alliance
A preliminary estimate by police put the crowd at the demonstration at around 9,000 people.

Berlin police deployed 500 officers to monitor both the demonstration and several planned counter-demonstrations.


What is the Lateral Thinking movement?​

The movement began in Stuttgart and eventually spread across Germany during the coronavirus pandemic.

Supporters repeatedly protested against lockdown measures and vaccine requirements as measures to contain the virus.

An estimated 20,000 people joined a demonstration against the coronavirus measures in Berlin in August 2020, although organizers claimed that the actual crowd was much larger.

Germany's domestic intelligence service, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, in 2021 said it would keep parts of the anti-coronavirus lockdown movement under observation.

While the protests became smaller after that, incidents of violence became more frequent. There was increasing concern that the rallies were being used as a platform for far-right and extremist views.

Protesters were noted to have increasingly embraced conspiracy theories, most notably those floated by the QAnon movement which originated in the United States.

This article was written using material from the DPA news agency.

Edited by: Sean Sinico
 

Fox Host Calls Covid a ‘Scam’​

Rachel Campos-Duffy previously said the virus is a "psy op"
By Peter Wade

August 4, 2024
Fox Host Calls Covid a 'Scam'

Fox News/Screenshot

Host Rachel Campos-Duffy praised Sen. Ron Johnson for “not falling for the Covid scam” during Sunday’s episode of Fox & Friends Weekend.

“I saw you had a podcast with Russell Brand. … You two couldn’t look more different and yet both of you were the most courageous people during the Covid pandemic scam, and both of you have stood up for those who were vaccine injured,” Campos-Duffy told Johnson.

Covid-19, which Campos-Duffy called a “scam,” has caused more than seven million deaths worldwide, according to the World Health Organization.

Campos-Duffy, a former Real World cast member, has spread Covid disinformation before. She previously claimed the pandemic was a “psy op” and lied when she alleged that “there is not one child that was healthy that died of Covid.” In 2021, she compared vaccine mandates to “apartheid.”

“We are starting to see this sort of apartheid-type vaccination system where, you know, if you are vaccinated you get certain privileges,” Campos-Duffy said. “If you are unvaccinated because, you know, you don’t want to take the vaccine or you have natural immunities because you already had Covid, you’re going to be denied certain privileges, including seeing your doctor.”

Campos-Duffy has claimed she is unvaccinated, despite a Fox News policy that required all of the network’s New York City employees show proof of vaccination to work in their headquarters during the pandemic.

After President Joe Biden made a joke that all of the Fox anchors in attendance at the 2022 White House Correspondents Dinner were vaccinated (proof of vaccination was required to attend), Campos-Duffy claimed that she and co-host Pete Hegseth — neither of whom were at the event — had not gotten the Covid vaccine.

“They tried to call out Fox News and say ‘Look! Fox News is all vaccinated!’ No, that’s not true!” she said. Campos-Duffy then pointed to Hegseth and said the two of them are “not vaccinated” because the network “allow people choice.”
 
Last edited:

Sunday's Pandemic Update: Covid levels Are Moderate To High Nationwide​


 
@Sharma Ji

The more covid shots, the more covid.

The Mystery of COVID's Resurgence in the Vaxxed​


 
Last edited:

Unlock Easy Guide to Geert Vanden Bosshe COVID Vaccine Insights​


 

Scientists are piecing together the puzzle of long COVID. Here’s what to know​

Health Aug 3, 2024 2:08 PM EDT
Since 2020, the condition known as long COVID-19 has become a widespread disability affecting the health and quality of life of millions of people across the globe and costing economies billions of dollars in reduced productivity of employees and an overall drop in the work force.

The intense scientific effort that long COVID sparked has resulted in more than 24,000 scientific publications, making it the most researched health condition in any four years of recorded human history.

Long COVID is a term that describes the constellation of long-term health effects caused by infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. These range from persistent respiratory symptoms, such as shortness of breath, to debilitating fatigue or brain fog that limits people’s ability to work, and conditions such as heart failure and diabetes, which are known to last a lifetime.

READ MORE: New long COVID guidance aims to help doctors identify mental health symptoms

I am a physician scientist, and I have been deeply immersed in studying long COVID since the early days of the pandemic. I have testified before the U.S. Senate as an expert witness on long COVID, have published extensively on it and was named as one of Time’s 100 most influential people in health in 2024 for my research in this area.

Over the first half of 2024, a flurry of reports and scientific papers on long COVID added clarity to this complex condition. These include, in particular, insights into how COVID-19 can still wreak havoc in many organs years after the initial viral infection, as well as emerging evidence on viral persistence and immune dysfunction that last for months or years after initial infection.



Spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Paris

Early on in the pandemic, the SARS-CoV-2 virus seemed to be primarily wreaking havoc on the lungs. But researchers quickly realized that it was affecting many organs in the body. Photo by Benoit Tessier via Reuters.

How long COVID affects the body​

A new study that my colleagues and I published in the New England Journal of Medicine on July 17, 2024, shows that the risk of long COVID declined over the course of the pandemic. In 2020, when the ancestral strain of SARS-CoV-2 was dominant and vaccines were not available, about 10.4 percent of adults who got COVID-19 developed long COVID. By early 2022, when the omicron family of variants predominated, that rate declined to 7.7 percent among unvaccinated adults and 3.5 percent of vaccinated adults. In other words, unvaccinated people were more than twice as likely to develop long COVID.

READ MORE: Years into the pandemic, scientists are still trying to understand long COVID

While researchers like me do not yet have concrete numbers for the current rate in mid-2024 due to the time it takes for long COVID cases to be reflected in the data, the flow of new patients into long COVID clinics has been on par with 2022.

We found that the decline was the result of two key drivers: availability of vaccines and changes in the characteristics of the virus – which made the virus less prone to cause severe acute infections and may have reduced its ability to persist in the human body long enough to cause chronic disease.

Despite the decline in risk of developing long COVID, even a 3.5 percent risk is substantial. New and repeat COVID-19 infections translate into millions of new long COVID cases that add to an already staggering number of people suffering from this condition.

Estimates for the first year of the pandemic suggests that at least 65 million people globally have had long COVID. Along with a group of other leading scientists, my team will soon publish updated estimates of the global burden of long COVID and its impact on the global economy through 2023.

In addition, a major new report by the National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine details all the health effects that constitute long COVID. The report was commissioned by the Social Security Administration to understand the implications of long COVID on its disability benefits.

It concludes that long COVID is a complex chronic condition that can result in more than 200 health effects across multiple body systems. These include new onset or worsening:

Long COVID can affect people across the lifespan from children to older adults and across race and ethnicity and baseline health status. Importantly, more than 90 percent of people with long COVID had mild COVID-19 infections.

The National Academies report also concluded that long COVID can result in the inability to return to work or school; poor quality of life; diminished ability to perform activities of daily living; and decreased physical and cognitive function for months or years after the initial infection.

READ MORE: These 12 symptoms may define long COVID, new study finds

The report points out that many health effects of long COVID, such as post-exertional malaise and chronic fatigue, cognitive impairment and autonomic dysfunction, are not currently captured in the Social Security Administration’s Listing of Impairments, yet may significantly affect an individual’s ability to participate in work or school.

Many people experience long COVID symptoms for years following initial infection.

A long road ahead​

What’s more, health problems resulting from COVID-19 can last years after the initial infection.

A large study published in early 2024 showed that even people who had a mild SARS-CoV-2 infection still experienced new health problems related to COVID-19 in the third year after the initial infection.

Such findings parallel other research showing that the virus persists in various organ systems for months or years after COVID-19 infection. And research is showing that immune responses to the infection are still evident two to three years after a mild infection. Together, these studies may explain why a SARS-CoV-2 infection years ago could still cause new health problems long after the initial infection.

WATCH: People living with long COVID explain how the disease changed their lives

Important progress is also being made in understanding the pathways by which long COVID wreaks havoc on the body. Two preliminary studies from the U.S. and the Netherlands show that when researchers transfer auto-antibodies – antibodies generated by a person’s immune system that are directed at their own tissues and organs – from people with long COVID into healthy mice, the animals start to experience long COVID-like symptoms such as muscle weakness and poor balance.

These studies suggest that an abnormal immune response thought to be responsible for the generation of these auto-antibodies may underlie long COVID and that removing these auto-antibodies may hold promise as potential treatments.

An ongoing threat​

Despite overwhelming evidence of the wide-ranging risks of COVID-19, a great deal of messaging suggests that it is no longer a threat to the public. Although there is no empirical evidence to back this up, this misinformation has permeated the public narrative.

The data, however, tells a different story.

COVID-19 infections continue to outnumber flu cases and lead to more hospitalization and death than the flu. COVID-19 also leads to more serious long-term health problems. Trivializing COVID-19 as an inconsequential cold or equating it with the flu does not align with reality.
The Conversation


This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top