Dark Warning from Maulana Fazlur Rahman: 'Two Provinces Could Break Away if Crisis Continues

If this carries on then only Punjab and Sindh will be left as Pakistan.

Pakistan is heading straight for a break up much worse than 1971.
I said it when khan was overthrown by the corrupt toppa that the enemy is within not outside.Our very own government and army wants to disintegrate Pakistan.
 
It's because people in Punjab don't tend to keep blowing stuff up and causing fassad, it's only natural for development to center around peacefull areas

Spare me the bullshit. Go and read history of Afghan Taliban (ex-mujahedeen) and TTP.
 
The biggest province by population, needs to be broken down into atleast 5 provinces.

The hegemony of the biggest province, on the basis of the population majority, can no longer carry forward, if democracy is to prevail, and less density population areas given more representation In the parliament and senate.

The majority of the hiring done to serve as the servants of the people, is localised to a few towns / cities / districts, of the biggest populated province.

It becomes apparent when the same institution, interferes and occupies civilian institutions and positions, it leads to the establishment of the fact that a specific province, in the name of the servants of the people, is establishing its hegemony over the country.

Be it Karachi, Gawadar, Quetta, Swat etc .....billions of rupees spent each year to maintain security but still protests and killings have continued.

On the other hand, peace and prosperity persists in the largest populated province of the country.

How is this stark contrast possible?

Unless the largest province, doesn't want the smaller provinces to prosper , want the poverty and illiteracy to continue and stop them from leading the country?

The relevancy of the smaller provinces in the federation is such that all the smaller provinces combined, can't Outnumber or out outvote the single largest province by population.

Similar thing they did to counter the shift of power from west pakistan to east pakistan, by combining all the provinces in the west pakistan into a single unit, but many years later and politics aside, the result was disastrous.

Is this real democracy or hegemony ?
You should not have established Pakistan on a land where Punjabis were the natural supermajority if you were just going to cry about it afterwards. Democracy is by definition majoritarianism - the majority rule follows. Punjab's population size is one of its resource due to its geography, water resource and fertile lands.

The 18th amendment exists and that's enough for representation. Beyond this you'll only create more problems. Not only will some see it as a systematic attack on Punjabi identity and sovereignty - but it won't change anything even if you divide as the people will still have roughly the same interests.
 
Why do members think the solution to the problem is splitting Punjab province into multiple provinces? Please educate yourself , internet exist and learn to use it.

Canadian provinces and American states are almost as big if not bigger than entire Pakistan. Issue was and is the corruption - by breaking a province into smaller provinces you are inviting more crooks to the table.

Accountability is the answer. Actually believing in your country and standing up for it is the solution.

People of KP and Balochistan have been ignored and treated like strangers in their own country, instead of realizing and learning from the mistake we are doubling down. What we are seeing in Punjab now, has been going on in Balochistan for ages.

if every institution stays in their defined boundary, we can fix the country. People need to come out on the streets and stand up for their rights .

It's not the size but devolution of power from the Feudals and corrupts to the masses that is required. Real democracy , Chinese style is the need of the day, time for us to discard the colonial pseudo democracy of the British empire. Accountability and transparency , rule of law and distribution of wealth and power is the need of the day.

I have always believed that the tribal system needs to be rooted out of the social fabric along with these sardars, waderas, and feudal lords. Until then, these people will not know true freedom and the errors of their way. I watched a Facebook reel the other day. A reporter asked an ordinary worker in Sindh what country he's from to test him, and he only mentioned the city he's in and worked from childhood to adulthood on a waderas farm.

Economic ills result due to social ills.
 
To address the challenges Pakistan faces in governance at the national, provincial, and local levels, I propose a series of structural changes aimed at ensuring fairer representation and more effective leadership.

National Level:

One of the first steps we must take is to limit the overreach of the establishment in political affairs, ensuring that decisions truly reflect the will of the people. At the same time, it's crucial to improve how representation works within our national institutions. Currently, larger provinces like Punjab can dominate national decision-making due to their population size, which creates frustration and feelings of neglect in smaller provinces.

A federal system that grants more autonomy to provinces is an essential solution. This system would empower each province to manage its own resources, development, and affairs, reducing the sense that one province holds disproportionate power. Decentralized governance will enable each region to thrive independently, leading to balanced national growth.

Additionally, we should consider adopting a bicameral parliamentary system. In this system, one house, like the National Assembly, could be based on population, giving larger provinces more seats, while the second house, similar to the Senate, would give equal representation to all provinces. This ensures that smaller provinces maintain a strong voice in national decisions. The model used in the U.S., where the House of Representatives is based on population and the Senate gives equal power to all states, could serve as an example.

A proportional representation system in national elections can further help balance the power between more and less populous provinces. For instance, Germany’s Bundesrat allows states to have influence over national laws, creating a more equitable distribution of power. In Pakistan, this could prevent any one province from monopolizing control over resources and policies.

Provincial Level:

On the provincial level, the imbalance caused by a single, populous province dominating national resources and decisions must be addressed. The key to reducing these tensions is creating a governance system where all provinces have their voices heard equally. This can be achieved through decentralization and greater control over local matters, including resource management and economic development. Ensuring that each province has a direct say in policies that affect its population will contribute to greater national harmony.

Additionally, constitutional guarantees should be implemented to ensure that national resources and development opportunities are fairly distributed across all provinces. This would prevent any one region from monopolizing economic growth or development funds, ensuring a more balanced and just allocation of the country's wealth.

Local Level:

At the local government level, we must establish a closer connection between the people and their representatives. Smaller populations per representative will help achieve this. Ideally, one representative for every 10,000 to 50,000 people would create stronger communication between leaders and the public, ensuring that local needs are adequately addressed. By keeping the population per representative at a manageable level, leaders can focus more on understanding and solving their constituents' problems.

For example, in countries like Sweden and the UK, local councils have much smaller populations per representative, which enhances accountability and responsiveness. A similar model should be adopted in Pakistan to ensure that local governments are more in touch with the communities they serve.

Conclusion:

By adopting a system of federalism, bicameralism, and proportional representation, Pakistan can ensure a more equitable and efficient governance structure. This would balance the power between populous and smaller provinces, decentralize control to provincial governments, and ensure that local governments are more closely connected to the people they represent. These changes are necessary to prevent any one province from dominating national politics and to create a system where all provinces and regions can thrive equally, ensuring long-term stability and prosperity for the entire nation.
 
Yea, to save pakistan from another breakup, give me another seat in the Parliament. A perks of a federal minister and a monthly allowance to screw young boys and eat plenty of halva.
 
I have always believed that the tribal system needs to be rooted out of the social fabric along with these sardars, waderas, and feudal lords. Until then, these people will not know true freedom and the errors of their way. I watched a Facebook reel the other day. A reporter asked an ordinary worker in Sindh what country he's from to test him, and he only mentioned the city he's in and worked from childhood to adulthood on a waderas farm.

Economic ills result due to social ills.
UK in haramion ko bettha ker gya hae. Like the curse of the dead albatross around are necks. Ye harami saara ilzaam army per daal detay hain they’ve turned our army into a punching bag and a laughing stock.

Behind the establishment are these chaudhry waderay sardar, fully backed by the west!
 
UK in haramion ko bettha ker gya hae. Like the curse of the dead albatross around are necks. Ye harami saara ilzaam army per daal detay hain they’ve turned our army into a punching bag and a laughing stock.

Behind the establishment are these kaafir chaudhry waderay sardar, fully backed by the west!

The tribal filth was there before the British, and all they did was utilize them as rulers before them.
 
I don't see any benefit for the common people of Pakistan in maintaining a united country, especially if the ongoing bloodshed continues. Perhaps Pakistan should be divided again, as it was in 1971. India could have liberated Balochistan, Sindhudesh, and Pakhtunistan back then, had the U.S. not intervened. While the U.S., the West, and even China may have strategic interests in a united Pakistan, such unity doesn't seem to serve the interests of the ordinary people living there.
 
The tribal filth was there before the British, and all they did was utilize them as rulers before them.
A good guy is needed to kill all these criminals and start anew from a clean table.

The whole thing gotta be removed and the garbage taken out.

It’s an existential issue now yaar.
 
I don't see any benefit for the common people of Pakistan in maintaining a united country, especially if the ongoing bloodshed continues. Perhaps Pakistan should be divided again, as it was in 1971. India could have liberated Balochistan, Sindhudesh, and Pakhtunistan back then, had the U.S. not intervened. While the U.S., the West, and even China may have strategic interests in a united Pakistan, such unity doesn't seem to serve the interests of the ordinary people living there.
So, if you have four rattlesnakes instead of one in your attic, you will sleep sounder?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top