j_hungary
Professional
Well, if you have to say that, then that only mean you are not neutral.Dont be naive. Israel is committing genocide, straight up. They have stopped food, water and medical supplies, shot children in the heads with sniper rounds, drove tanks over dead bodies, flattened housing complexes with people still in them, starved people to death, occupied territory of the Palestinians, Jordanians, and Syrians. All these are textbook definition of genocide and all these events are reported by international media yet you are happy with a ‘neutral’ response. Shame on you. If it were not censored, it should have mentioned the overwhelmingly one sided death toll of the supposed ‘war’, dead children, lies told, and exposed, by the Israeli government, using fake news of dead beheaded babies as an excuse to start this genocide and more. All these are cold hard accepted truths worldwide.
Because one would say it's up to the law, are you a judge or lawyer? Is ChatGPT a judge or lawyer? Cause I ain't, you can say whatever you want, but at the end of the day, I don't go out of my way and comment on something I do not process professional knowledge on.
So unless you are a better panel than the entire 34 panel of judge with ICJ, I would defer the "Decision" to them. But if you don't think that's neutral, than well, I guess we are all biased then











