No harm in speaking but Iran must take a clear stance and strong action to discourage Israel from repeating their terrorist activities in Iran.
Nobody will argue with that. However, there's a deeper strategic issue that's affecting Iran negatively: Iran is responding to a security failure by military means which:
- first and foremost puts the country in a REACTIVE position. This is very significant since reactivity, by very definition, culls available options in a big way (unlike proactivity).
- disrupts long term (expensive) strategy very cheaply--i.e. The Resistance
- brings the country closer to war (very expensive)
- requires an 'outsized' military response which would not have been needed if the opponent attacked militarily. This is why we perceive Iranians as 'trigger shy'--not because of some inherent deficiency but because of the nature of response required.
As for Zionia, itself, it's trying to make up for its huge strategic defeat by piling up a bunch of tactical wins. It's POSSIBLE it can-- but still unlikely, at this stage, given the depth of their ongoing defeat.
Of all the conversations and chatter I hear out of Iran, 'retaliation' is the word of the day. I hear nothing about the simplest solution: Tightening internal security and processes. It's incredible we see no progress after all these years. Very concerning.
