Dr. Shahiduzzaman: in order to change India’s habitual perception, our only answer as I feel is nuclearization.

[AjayGhatak]

You have no idea about nuclear research. Not your speciality so no need to try and understand it.

Huh? Lets hear it from you, when did you last join Los Alamos National Laboratory?

What experties do you have in this research to claim that simulations are as good as real tests?

Furthermore, what deep knowledge of Pakistan's nuclear weapons design and program that you have to make such intersting conclusions?

 

[AjayGhatak]

If our wet dreams is making yall so hot and bothered then I guess it’s working

Working what? Its not going to prevent India from say releasing dam-load of water to sink you folks. Notwithstanding whatever wet dreams you and your professors in Dhaka university have about nuclear condoms.

India's "Habitual Perception" of Bangladesh being a country of <put your favourite adjective here> people is not going to change one bit.

 

[Thinking]

Why does it hurt when yall can make fun of people wearing lungi? Class divide is part of your culture, don’t be so shocked when someone from outside uses your weapons against you

Besides I wasn’t even talking about hygiene but your anecdotal “heard from someone” vs the entire world knowing India for its hygiene practice is miles apart in comparison.

You are speaking gibberish since there is not a single post of mine praising hygiene of India, let lone one made in this particular thread. If anything, I am all too critical of cleanliness in India.

Again, no one got "hurt". You just insulted yourself and beloved Khalistani community because they are the ones who got labeled with that particular slur. It doesn't even work on Indians and if it somehow did, it will definitely apply to someone from Bangladesh. Thinking is always hard.

P.S: I am not even sure what lungi has to do with anything. All elders in my family wear it, at home.

 

[Pingle]

Whatever you say bro. The world doesn’t revolve around Indians. Accept the fact

Yes I know and this why I am telling you that no third world country with nukes can provide nuclear umbrella or station its nukes in third country... India too cannot do this.... these nukes are only for a self defense against other nuclear powers who are having disputes with each other...

Only top tier powers like US or NATO can do such stunts... so come out of this fantasy of Pakistan coming to Bangladesh or Saudi aid with nukes against India or Iran (Iran which is sure shot a nuclear power without test) ... leave it to big boys like America, UK, France....

 

[Pingle]

If I use the same self defense excuse you and your people would have problem with my defense so leave it

You can at least show some maturity by saying Nuclear umbrella from US or China.... or at least desire to have your own....

Pakistan is a nuclear power but cannot go against another nuclear power under the name of umbrella... Its no America who can nuke even other 2nd Tier nuclear powers like Pakistan, India, North Korea, Iran and get away with it without a fear of retaliation from them....

 

[Pataliputra]

You don't know what a second strike is.

Second strike - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I’m not even talking about a second strike; Pakistan doesn’t even have the capability to launch a nuclear weapon against India.
That's why India maintains a policy of not using nuclear weapons against Pakistan—because India knows Pakistan lacks any credible nuclear deterrence against it.

 

[Fallstuff]

I will rather opt for large inventory of hypersonic or conventional precision missiles.
It is a huge deterrent as we see in ME.

 

[Michael Corleone]

You can at least show some maturity by saying Nuclear umbrella from US or China.... or at least desire to have your own....

Pakistan is a nuclear power but cannot go against another nuclear power under the name of umbrella... Its no America who can nuke even other 2nd Tier nuclear powers like Pakistan, India, North Korea, Iran and get away with it without a fear of retaliation from them....

No one needs to go against anyone under a treaty arrangement. If their nukes kept you guys from engaging in war with them then same could work for us under an arrangement which both countries deem fit. Not for you or India to decide what’s appropriate

 

[Michael Corleone]

You are speaking gibberish since there is not a single post of mine praising hygiene of India, let lone one made in this particular thread. If anything, I am all too critical of cleanliness in India.

Again, no one got "hurt". You just insulted yourself and beloved Khalistani community because they are the ones who got labeled with that particular slur. It doesn't even work on Indians and if it somehow did, it will definitely apply to someone from Bangladesh. Thinking is always hard.

P.S: I am not even sure what lungi has to do with anything. All elders in my family wear it, at home.

AFAIK we don’t stink like pajeeits but indians do but whatever you say to cope with the stigma.

 

[Michael Corleone]

Working what? Its not going to prevent India from say releasing dam-load of water to sink you folks. Notwithstanding whatever wet dreams you and your professors in Dhaka university have about nuclear condoms.

India's "Habitual Perception" of Bangladesh being a country of <put your favourite adjective here> people is not going to change one bit.

So now you admit that was intentional even though your government denied the claim. Hasina is gone. Can’t stop China from building dams to counter India so don’t worry, flash flood card isn’t going to work in the future

 

[AjayGhatak]

I will rather opt for large inventory of hypersonic or conventional precision missiles.
It is a huge deterrent as we see in ME.

You can certainly build conventional missiles, hypersonic will take sometime. Also if you buy from outside, it will be range limited to 300 KM. Still very useful.

That being said, India will only need 150 KM range rocket artillery to cover entire Bangladesh due to geography.

So economics of this kind of war favours INdia.

 

[Michael Corleone]

Huh? Lets hear it from you, when did you last join Los Alamos National Laboratory?

What experties do you have in this research to claim that simulations are as good as real tests?

Furthermore, what deep knowledge of Pakistan's nuclear weapons design and program that you have to make such intersting conclusions?

Before I answer that, tell me what you know of Pakistans tests?

 

[AjayGhatak]

Before I answer that, tell me what you know of Pakistans tests?

I know about their yields which were of typical fission device and the fact that they only tested once. That is more than enough to tell which country will have more reliable and better tested weapon : Pakistan or North Korea.

Now tell me, when did you join Los Alamos?

 

[AjayGhatak]

AFAIK we don’t stink like pajeeits but indians do but whatever you say to cope with the stigma.

Oh you do! Equally badly. Atleast in the minds of all whites. The fact that you are muslims make them hate you even more. Not to mention in west, Bangladeshis are among poorest of subcontient people. Makes them even more vulnerable to white hate groups.

 

[Fallstuff]

You can certainly build conventional missiles, hypersonic will take sometime. Also if you buy from outside, it will be range limited to 300 KM. Still very useful.

That being said, India will only need 150 KM range rocket artillery to cover entire Bangladesh due to geography.

So economics of this kind of war favours INdia.

The key word is deterrence. Large neighbor has bad relations with everyone in the neighborhood.
That’s the only thing that will keep peace in the neighborhood.
After that we can all live happily ever after.