Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is either absolutely moronic or extremely dishonest PostWhat has been achieved with these democratic rights that you speak of?
Corruption, nepotism, inefficiency, siphoning of public funds, but worst of all - incompetence in public office.
Now that last trait has been demonstrated by a number of democratically elected leaders in Pakistan, of which Khan is the WORST case. Granted, he may have been poorly advised, but any educated and rational Pakistani would have been rolling their eyes (yes, like you do every other post) at his litany of diplomatic mis-steps during his term in office. Embarrassment after embarrassment, whether he was busy meeting Vlad or shunning the Saudis. Many of us had enough semblance of shame to balk at his tomfoolery. I wonder why you and your ilk saw fit to forgive the clownery just because he was handsome enough to draw a smile from Melania?!
The nation was left scrambling to defend his embarrassments while he marched ever onwards in his egotistical state of delusion.
With even a semi-competent global representative (and this is despite all my loathing of patwaris and the Sharifs and Bhuttos), such clownery can be averted and our officials can worry less about "diplomatic damage control" and instead actually get on with their jobs.
Yes, Pakistan needs to be controlled by a benevolent, non-egotistical, functional dictatorship. To hell with the demagoguery and jhalsas of the last three decades.
Doesnt matter as long as majority of youthias in kpk believe that itDo you seriously believe that or are just in youhtiaaa phase of life?
. Even BD with an autocrat-like democracy, has done well in 50 years.. while India has leapt miles in the 3d rate democracy setup.This is either absolutely moronic or extremely dishonest Post
Pakistan never had democracy and none of yhe developed country had autocratic governments
KPK people first expel all terrorists to avoid collateral damage (by their own army within the country).
Then PA can step in like Lords to kill/accetpt surrender from terrorists.
Then why do we need an army? If locals are that strong and macho, they would have done that themselves.
China is fully developed and has an autocratic government. North Korea and Iran are both better developed than Pakistan.This is either absolutely moronic or extremely dishonest Post
Pakistan never had democracy and none of yhe developed country had autocratic governments
So spare me what pakistan has achieved..the most corrupt organization by any international organizations reports first hand reports and pure common sense is military and military controls the country it never had a democracy ever
Those who were honest were killed jailed or forced to leave by military
Even the politicians brought in wereall corrupt forcefully elected by the military especially in Karachi to run its opium export business smoothly
Now i refuse to acceot your IQ can be this bad
Locals support terrorists. If support is ended terrorists will be forced to flee, then army can drop a bomb and kill them avoiding collateral damage. The ball is in tribal court. Die with TTP or live depend on tribals.
Remember zarb-e-azb? its like that basically.
China is fully developed and has an autocratic government. North Korea and Iran are both better developed than Pakistan.
Lunatics like you who think the country has time and resources to waste on jhalsas and jirgas and million man marches are PRECISELY the reason why Pakistan needs autocracy.
Regarding past "attempts" at democracy that you have listed - their failures simply illustrate the point I am making.
Feel free to assign me any IQ that you deem me worthy of. It remains your subjective inference and nothing more.
This must be the ONLY military of the world that keeps doing "internal" operations for the past 70+ years.preparation for operation zarb-e-azb 2.0 in full swing
Yes, even North Korea is starting to turn around even though it is the most autocratic country in the world. And why? Because they have the focus and continuity of policies. They suffered--like Cuba suffered--once the Soviet Teats were removed from them. But given a choice, I'd rather live in North Korea than in many so-called 'democratic' countries of the world--including the world's largest democracy India.China is fully developed and has an autocratic government. North Korea and Iran are both better developed than Pakistan.
Lunatics like you who think the country has time and resources to waste on jhalsas and jirgas and million man marches are PRECISELY the reason why Pakistan needs autocracy.
You said that better than me:KPK people first expel all terrorists to avoid collateral damage (by their own army within the country).
Then PA can step in like Lords to kill/accetpt surrender from terrorists.
Then why do we need an army? If locals are that strong and macho, they would have done that themselves.
This must be the ONLY military of the world that keeps doing "internal" operations for the past 70+ years.![]()
"Reforms" are simply not possible in a perpetual establishment aligned country like PakistanHe was working with some top Generals to retain power for at least 10 years and make drastic reforms.
You have it all upside down. These Jirgas, Jalsas, Marches happen PRECISELY because the people of Pakistan are duly tired of military led autocracy in the country...Lunatics like you who think the country has time and resources to waste on jhalsas and jirgas and million man marches are PRECISELY the reason why Pakistan needs autocracy.
What next.. J&K people should expel IA? so that PA can win Kashmir for them?Locals support terrorists. If support is ended terrorists will be forced to flee, then army can drop a bomb and kill them avoiding collateral damage. The ball is in tribal court. Die with TTP or live depend on tribals.
Remember zarb-e-azb? its like that basically.