ChineseTiger1986
Trusted Member
During Deng, Jiang and Zhu's eras, there were rampant corruptions that are true even today to some extent, that corruptions and also uncontrolled inflations at the time were what really fueled the 1989 protest. I thought Jiang and Zhu had a good work relationship starting their partnership in Shanghai as party secretary and mayor.
Without Jiang, China would be fully privatized by Deng and Zhu, and would become a true servant to the US.
Jiang wasn't an anti-US champion himself, he also admired the US strength during his time, but he was just a sane person who believed that full privatization and westernization that championed by Deng and Zhu was wrong.
Xi also wasn't anti-US during his first term, until Trump and other anti-China hardliners in the US forced him to become fully vigilant.
I am from Shanghai, and Shanghai is de facto a very bipolarized place.
The rich from Shanghai were mostly Hanjian who supported the KMT and loved Deng's promise of full privatization.
The Petite bourgeoisie in Shanghai were oxymorons who got brainwashed by the rich Hanjian in Shanghai.
All working class in Shanghai staunchly support Mao, and CPC also chose Shanghai to be its birthplace because of the support from the working class.
BTW, I am a descendant of the KMT, but I have to admit that KMT is full of Hanjian and deserved to be overthrown by the Chinese people.
And the only Hanjian that I see as sh1tty as the KMT are the rich oligarch protected by Deng and Zhu.
Last edited:


