Unknowntruth
Full Member
- Dec 27, 2023
- 1,616
- 2,822
- Country of Origin
- Country of Residence
Attacking someone is not self defense. There is no self defense in nature. You said Arabs attacked them now you say self defense by nature. Why do you keep changing your story when you get called out for your lies?The preemptive strike was self defense in nature, considering Arab leagues' tendency to attack Israel in the past and the accumulation of military power in the borders.
Any country is allowed to have war games or anything of that nature on their own territory. Having a military buildup means nothing as long as they did not attack. Attacking Israel in the past? Egypt only attacked Israel in 1948 under pressure from the Nakba that Israel rolled out on the Palestinian people. Yes, that is not the same thing as you claim.Background of preemptive strike:
- Mobilization of Arab Forces: In the weeks leading up to the war, Egypt, along with other Arab states like Syria and Jordan, mobilized and positioned their armed forces near Israel's borders. This was perceived in Israel as a clear sign of an impending attack.
- Political Rhetoric: The rhetoric from Arab leaders, including Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser, was often aggressively anti-Israel and was interpreted as signaling an intent to go to war. Nasser's statements, in particular, were viewed as a direct threat to Israel's existence.
- Blocking the Straits of Tiran: Egypt's blockade of the Straits of Tiran, a crucial maritime passage for Israeli shipping, was considered by Israel as a casus belli. This act was perceived not only as an economic threat but also as a strategic and military provocation.
Egypt has every right to be anti anyone it wants especially one who kicked out 700,000 Palestinians and destroyed over 500 Palestinian villages. Egypt blocking the strait is within Egypts right because it is. EGYPTS TERRITORY. You have no say in another’s territory especially a colonizer. Even if internationally community ruled against Egypt, it does not give them the right to attack them. It was not an armed attack but as a result of your occupation of Palestine and the nakba you rolled out.
Side not:
You make the claim that it’s self defense to attack another country over their sovereign control of their territorial water?
Yet you are a hypocrite because not only is Israel laying siege on Gaza blocking anything from coming in and out. They close their airspace, control their movement, control the goods coming in, sea, and everything in between. You even restrict goods coming in and ban items like chocolate, wtf? It is also an occupying power. All of this yet Palestinians have no right to all these provactions on their own territory. The difference is you are actually controlling another people and their territory while Egypt is exercising their right on their own territory.
If Israel was justified to attack Egypt because of the control of it own territorial water. Hamas is 1 million times more justified to attack Israel for all the crimes and siege it lays on Palestinians in their own territory.
Hypocrite hypocrite hypocrite
Last edited: