Hezbollah-Israel Conflict 2024 - Lebanon & Occupied Palestine Territories

Israel’s Righteous War on Hezbollah

israeli-airstrike-lebanon.jpg
Smoke billows following Israeli strikes, seen from Tyre in southern Lebanon, September 23, 2024.(Aziz Taher/Reuters)

By Rich Lowry
September 24, 2024 6:30 AM

The Jewish state is under no obligation to tolerate the intolerable.

Israel is supposed to tolerate the intolerable.

A terror group has launched thousands of missiles into the Jewish state over the last year — catalyzed by a hideous pogrom against Israel carried out by another terror group — and we are told that it is Israel, finally hitting back in earnest, that is dangerously escalating the situation.

Since the Hamas atrocities on October 7, Lebanon-based Hezbollah has fired roughly 8,000 rockets at Israel. These indiscriminate attacks have forced tens of thousands of Israelis to flee the north of the country. In July, a missile killed twelve children and teenagers who were playing soccer in the Golan Heights, a random massacre with no military purpose whatsoever.

Israel retaliated for the horror in the Golan Heights but has generally absorbed Hezbollah’s attacks, since it’s been focused on the war against Hamas to its south while the Biden administration has been working to stay its hand in the north.

The theme, as ever, is that the Jewish state is expected to accept as background noise unprovoked attacks on its sovereign territory that no other state would ever abide.

What other country is asked to bear the rocketing of its civilian population as the price for faux regional comity?

Israel won’t abide by these rules, and nor should it. It began turning up the heat against Hezbollah with its Mission Impossible–worthy attacks on Hezbollah operatives via their pagers and other electronic devices.

The pager attack was an experiment in whether Israel could carry out perhaps the most carefully calibrated counterterrorist operation in the modern age and still get accused of committing war crimes. Sure enough, AOC and others have condemned the Jewish state.

Israel hits terrorist targets from the air — and it’s accused of war crimes.

Israel goes in on the ground — and it’s accused of war crimes.

Israel does neither, opting instead to target terrorists by using their own devices against them — and it’s accused of war crimes.

The assumption is that Israel’s role is to duck and cover and take whatever punishment its remorseless enemies dole out, lest things “escalate.”

The Israel Defense Forces could be fighting a delaying action as the Jewish state is being pushed into the sea by advancing forces committed to its destruction — and it would still be accused of war crimes.

This entire way of thinking is a deep moral perversion masquerading as nuanced strategic thought.

The idea that the pager attack is a violation of international law is preposterous. The philosopher Michael Walzer made the case against the operation in the New York Times, arguing that the operatives killed and wounded “had not been mobilized and they were not militarily engaged.” In the same breath, though, he conceded, “Yes, the devices most probably were being used by Hezbollah operatives for military purposes.”

This made them legitimate military targets. As a practical matter, there is no other way that Israel could have hit so many terrorists with so little collateral damage. It could have droned or sent sniper teams after just a few of them and — tragically — ended up causing more collateral damage. The targeting of the pager attack was effectively done by Hezbollah itself by distributing the devices to its own operators.

Taking advantage of the resulting disruption in Hezbollah communications and the reduction in its effective ranks, Israel has followed up with a bombing strike against a meeting of high-level Hezbollah leadership and the destruction from the air of Hezbollah munitions and missile launchers. To the Biden administration, this looks like a mere escalation because it doesn’t understand the concept of deterrence — making an enemy fear what you might do to him, rather than allowing the enemy to set the pace for a conflict or to constrain your actions out of worry over what he might do next.

If Israel can successfully deter Hezbollah, it could mean — this obviously isn’t guaranteed — that the conflict de-escalates. Regardless, the Jewish state is under no obligation to tolerate the intolerable.

© 2024 by King Features Syndicate
 
Given how intelligent Isreal’s Mossad is to carry out such a complicated and coordinated operation to take out hezbollah leaders, how the hell did they not know about October 7 beforehand?
Behavioral surprise. This is what becomes possible when the opponent's behavior seems inconsistent with the intelligence analyst's expectations, and suddenly everything that seemed illogical becomes absolutely real and reality takes you by surprise. Hamas acted irrationally from Israel's perspective in order to disguise it. The art of deception. This is how Israel's intelligence was taken by surprise.
 
🇱🇧/🇮🇱 NEW: Hezbollah used the 'Fadi-3' rocket for the first time in its attack on the 'Samson' base, located east of Haifa, approximately 30 minutes ago.

@Middle_East_Spectator

❗🇮🇱/🇱🇧 NEW: The IDF claims it killed Ibrahim Muhammad Qubaisy, the Commander of Hezbollah's missile and rocket array, in a strike on Beirut

@Middle_East_Spectator
 
Exactly but I don't think educating Israelis is what Palestinians are looking for here.

By that logic two state or one state, what difference does it make? If you create a Jewish elite in Palestine that'll simply be a military colony. It's not a South Africa like situation because Jews would still form a majority of the population. I don't see that working out given the current situation. But I do hope one peace prevail 🤞 someday
No they wont if refugees are allowed back

There are millions of state leas Palestine refugees in Eygpt and jordan

One state with one vote ia solution but won't happen for this reason

Regardless there has been too much killing so ultimately this will end only in 1 of two ways

Alll thr arabs dead (500million) or all jews killed and kicked out

So its probably going to have a nuclear war

Dictatorships Americans have propped up wont last for ever
 

Israel’s Righteous War on Hezbollah

israeli-airstrike-lebanon.jpg
Smoke billows following Israeli strikes, seen from Tyre in southern Lebanon, September 23, 2024.(Aziz Taher/Reuters)

By Rich Lowry
September 24, 2024 6:30 AM

The Jewish state is under no obligation to tolerate the intolerable.

Israel is supposed to tolerate the intolerable.

A terror group has launched thousands of missiles into the Jewish state over the last year — catalyzed by a hideous pogrom against Israel carried out by another terror group — and we are told that it is Israel, finally hitting back in earnest, that is dangerously escalating the situation.

Since the Hamas atrocities on October 7, Lebanon-based Hezbollah has fired roughly 8,000 rockets at Israel. These indiscriminate attacks have forced tens of thousands of Israelis to flee the north of the country. In July, a missile killed twelve children and teenagers who were playing soccer in the Golan Heights, a random massacre with no military purpose whatsoever.

Israel retaliated for the horror in the Golan Heights but has generally absorbed Hezbollah’s attacks, since it’s been focused on the war against Hamas to its south while the Biden administration has been working to stay its hand in the north.

The theme, as ever, is that the Jewish state is expected to accept as background noise unprovoked attacks on its sovereign territory that no other state would ever abide.

What other country is asked to bear the rocketing of its civilian population as the price for faux regional comity?

Israel won’t abide by these rules, and nor should it. It began turning up the heat against Hezbollah with its Mission Impossible–worthy attacks on Hezbollah operatives via their pagers and other electronic devices.

The pager attack was an experiment in whether Israel could carry out perhaps the most carefully calibrated counterterrorist operation in the modern age and still get accused of committing war crimes. Sure enough, AOC and others have condemned the Jewish state.

Israel hits terrorist targets from the air — and it’s accused of war crimes.

Israel goes in on the ground — and it’s accused of war crimes.

Israel does neither, opting instead to target terrorists by using their own devices against them — and it’s accused of war crimes.

The assumption is that Israel’s role is to duck and cover and take whatever punishment its remorseless enemies dole out, lest things “escalate.”

The Israel Defense Forces could be fighting a delaying action as the Jewish state is being pushed into the sea by advancing forces committed to its destruction — and it would still be accused of war crimes.

This entire way of thinking is a deep moral perversion masquerading as nuanced strategic thought.

The idea that the pager attack is a violation of international law is preposterous. The philosopher Michael Walzer made the case against the operation in the New York Times, arguing that the operatives killed and wounded “had not been mobilized and they were not militarily engaged.” In the same breath, though, he conceded, “Yes, the devices most probably were being used by Hezbollah operatives for military purposes.”

This made them legitimate military targets. As a practical matter, there is no other way that Israel could have hit so many terrorists with so little collateral damage. It could have droned or sent sniper teams after just a few of them and — tragically — ended up causing more collateral damage. The targeting of the pager attack was effectively done by Hezbollah itself by distributing the devices to its own operators.

Taking advantage of the resulting disruption in Hezbollah communications and the reduction in its effective ranks, Israel has followed up with a bombing strike against a meeting of high-level Hezbollah leadership and the destruction from the air of Hezbollah munitions and missile launchers. To the Biden administration, this looks like a mere escalation because it doesn’t understand the concept of deterrence — making an enemy fear what you might do to him, rather than allowing the enemy to set the pace for a conflict or to constrain your actions out of worry over what he might do next.

If Israel can successfully deter Hezbollah, it could mean — this obviously isn’t guaranteed — that the conflict de-escalates. Regardless, the Jewish state is under no obligation to tolerate the intolerable.

© 2024 by King Features Syndicate
Humans apart from chosen jew people are goyim.

Jews are doing a favor to kill them

Goyim were born to serve the jews
 
Last edited:
🇱🇧/🇮🇱 NEW: Hezbollah used the 'Fadi-3' rocket for the first time in its attack on the 'Samson' base, located east of Haifa, approximately 30 minutes ago.

@Middle_East_Spectator

❗🇮🇱/🇱🇧 NEW: The IDF claims it killed Ibrahim Muhammad Qubaisy, the Commander of Hezbollah's missile and rocket array, in a strike on Beirut

@Middle_East_Spectator
Seems it one way show at this time
Not sure what Hezbollah original plan is anyway like whats the point of firing useless rockets
 
Watch the moment Hezbollah missiles fell on Kiryat Shmona.

Watch the moment Hezbollah missiles fell on Safad, Israel.
 
Watch the moment Hezbollah missiles fell on Kiryat Shmona.

Watch the moment Hezbollah missiles fell on Safad, Israel.
Nothing new.

Hizballah has been targeting Israel cities and civilians for about a year.

They are the ones that started this war.

~
 
Nothing new.

Hizballah has been targeting Israel cities and civilians for about a year.

They are the ones that started this war.

~
They didn't start the war

The war started because without asking the local population, they established a colonial apartheid ethnocentric Zionist state in the middle east

That's why their is war and conflict

Let's not make up crap about Palestinians or Lebanese fighting back against occupation is starting a war
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top