TallGuy
Registered Member
what you are missing is when we have "duel use policy" that means minimum deterence is maintained, so limited numbers are produced to be used as nuclear strike option.If you read what you wrote yourself, you simply implying that "dual use" weapons can only be used in nuclear domain. Which is farce. What is the purpose of them to be "dual use" to begin with?
What conditions would satisfy you to use babur against India in conventional role when its can be used in nuclear role? Think very carefully before you answer this.
2) Indian army was using their tactical cruise missile brahmos extensively, your point is?
now again? what do you think how many Ballistic missiles & cruise missile we can afford to manufacture? how many Shaheen 1A and shaheen II Ballistic missiles in service? how many Ghaznavi Missile system in service and how many Babur GL-LACM is in service.
do you think under duel use policy we would have manufactured stockpile worth the conventional warfare.
you have to understand the situation with Pakistan, we do not have deep pockets. so we induct enough weapons to create a deterrence in nuclear exchange.
do you know PAF purchased total 60 CM400AKG. do you understand?






