India - US Tariff and Relations | News + Updates

Ram ram ji,

A joint statement has now been put out , so the agreement is now much more clearly defined.


Frankly, to my mind, it is an even bigger win for India than initial headlines suggested. Unlike most other countries, India has been able to protect the highly employment-sensitive agricultural sector and secured a formal commitment that the US will consider lowering the reciprocal tariff rate even further. Furher, Indian exports in many sectors will enjoy lower preferential tariffs or be completely tariff -free.

The 500 bn dollar buying of US goods is an aspirational intention and not a formal commitment under the agreement, but, given the explicit reference to Indian purchases of GPUs from the US (rather than China), I expect a large proportion of that to be accounted for by the new technology ventures of the Tatas, Ambanis, Adanis, etc and also the Indian subsidiaries of companies like Amazon, Google and Microsoft who have each already pledged tens of billions of investments in India.

0% on all US goods entering India, but yeah, go on, tell me how you "won"....

This is like how you "won" in May last year right?
 
0% on all US goods entering India, but yeah, go on, tell me how you "won"....

This is like how you "won" in May last year right?

Where did you get '0% on all goods' from, Trump University? 😂
Even the big hype about agri exports has boiled down to marginal stuff like DDGS and sorghum for animal feed.
 
0% on all US goods entering India, but yeah, go on, tell me how you "won"....

This is like how you "won" in May last year right?
Ram ram ji,

The exact language used is "
  • India will eliminate or reduce tariffs on all U.S. industrial goods and a wide range of U.S. food and agricultural products, including dried distillers’ grains (DDGs), red sorghum for animal feed, tree nuts, fresh and processed fruit, soybean oil, wine and spirits, and additional products."
Notably, there will be no change to tariffs at all for dairy and major crops like wheat, rice, sugar, etc. Additionally the use of the phrase "eliminate or reduce" clearly implies that tariffs will continue to be levied even on the goods that are covered, though they will come down from the existing levels of upto 200% .

If you interpret this to mean that all US goods will be able to enter without any tariffs, then I can only marvel at your reading comprehension skills.
 
Ram ram ji,

The exact language used is "
  • India will eliminate or reduce tariffs on all U.S. industrial goods and a wide range of U.S. food and agricultural products, including dried distillers’ grains (DDGs), red sorghum for animal feed, tree nuts, fresh and processed fruit, soybean oil, wine and spirits, and additional products."
Notably, there will be no change to tariffs at all for dairy and major crops like wheat, rice, sugar, etc. Additionally the use of the phrase "eliminate or reduce" clearly implies that tariffs will continue to be levied even on the goods that are covered, though they will come down from the existing levels of upto 200% .

If you interpret this to mean that all US goods will be able to enter without any tariffs, then I can only marvel at your reading comprehension skills.

Like the word gymnastics Rakesh, India has effectively opened up it's entire economy to the US, Trump is over the moon. Spin it anyway you want....
 
Like the word gymnastics Rakesh, India has effectively opened up it's entire economy to the US, Trump is over the moon. Spin it anyway you want....
Ram ram Yasser76 ji,

I, for both ideological and selfish reasons, am one of the biggest proponets of India opening up its economy a lot more. Unfortunately for me and contrary to your wishes, while the US will certainly enjoy enhanced levels of access , the Indian economy can hardly be characterized as having been completely opened up to the US. Goods considered as luxuries will continue to be highly taxed and most of the agricultural sector will continue to be protected and remain as inefficient as it was.
 
Like the word gymnastics Rakesh, India has effectively opened up it's entire economy to the US, Trump is over the moon. Spin it anyway you want....

Honestly, I wish we had opened up properly instead of all this media wordplay on both sides. A real opening would help us integrate into global supply chains right now, but politically it’s almost suicide.

Funny how opening up the economy is seen as a bad thing, when it actually helps countries stop producing inefficient stuff and focus on their real strengths. Hopefully we’ll become more open over time.

Hoping your words come true soon
 
Honestly, I wish we had opened up properly instead of all this media wordplay on both sides. A real opening would help us integrate into global supply chains right now, but politically it’s almost suicide.

Funny how opening up the economy is seen as a bad thing, when it actually helps countries stop producing inefficient stuff and focus on their real strengths. Hopefully we’ll become more open over time.

Hoping your words come true soon
Right, protecting against dumping of cheap Chinese goods is one thing, but most American products, outside of agriculture, would hardly be price competitive in India. Why deny consumers more choice ? I guess the negotiators want to hold some leverage in reserve for the full BTA they are negotiating , which will, hopefully, bring down US tariffs even further.
 
@Yasser76 @RamBharose @vasanthm

I am happy to note that in spite of whatever differences Indians and Pakistanis have, at least on one subject and on one forum there is a complete consensus. Both Indians and Pakistanis are happy with the Indo-US trade deal and presumably believe that their own respective countries have been best served by this deal. Lets hope Indians continue to sign more such FTAs which bring mirth to Indians and Pakistanis alike on PDF.

Ram Ramji to everyone.

Regards
 

Modis Deal With Trump: Submission Sold as High Strategy​

M.K. Venu7 Feb 2026
Even the erstwhile East India Company might have envied India's one-sided trade deal with the United States.

The framework for an interim agreement on bilateral trade jointly released by India and the United States (US) does something unprecedented in the history of free and fair trade among nations. How can a nation give an omnibus commitment to buy USD 500 billion worth of goods at the rate of USD 100 billion each year over the next five years? Has free trade ever been conducted in this manner?

This entirely one-sided commitment by India to the US is problematic on many levels. At present, India has about USD 130 billion of two-way trade with the US and enjoys a trade surplus of about USD 45 billion. India's exports to the US are about USD 85 billion, and imports are USD 40 billion. Trump has had a problem with India having a substantial trade surplus with America, and he attributes this to unfair tariff and non-tariff barriers imposed by India, which prevent the US from exporting enough to India. Trump's advisor Peter Navarro is particularly focused on non-tariff barriers, which help protect India's big business groups.

From tree nuts and dried distillers’ grains to red sorghum and fresh and processed fruit, the U.S.-India Agreement will provide new market access for American products. pic.twitter.com/mqpP10LJp1

— United States Trade Representative (@USTradeRep) February 6, 2026
In any free or open trade arrangement, such barriers are reciprocally brought down. Once barriers are removed, the two sides are expected to compete on the basis of their competitiveness. This is how things normally happen. But India is doing something unprecedented by not only bringing down tariff and non-tariff barriers but also assuring Trump that India would buy, over the next five years, USD 500 billion worth of items in sectors such as energy, food and agriculture, aircraft as well as its components, precious metals, coking coal, etc.

In fact, by doing so, the Prime Minister Narendra Modi government may be effectively wiping out India's trade surplus of USD 45 billion and replacing it with a growing trade deficit with the US. Even the erstwhile British East India Company might have envied such a one-way deal.

No wonder the US Agriculture Secretary, Brooke Rollins, confidently posted on X 48 hours ago that India's offer to open up its agri sector will help America wipe out its trade deficit of USD 1.3 billion with India in the agriculture sector. The framework for an interim agreement gives enough indication that this is very much a possibility.

Thank you @POTUS for ONCE AGAIN delivering for our American farmers.

New US-India deal will export more American farm products to India's massive market, lifting prices, and pumping cash into rural America.

In 2024, America’s agricultural trade deficit with India was $1.3… https://t.co/Z04eNDfXjD

— Secretary Brooke Rollins (@SecRollins) February 2, 2026
Also read: India-US Trade Deal: Five Takeaways From the White House Statements

Just imagine: at present, the annual trade between India and the US is about USD 130 billion. US exports are about USD 40 billion. As per the framework agreement, the US could up its exports from USD 40 billion to USD 100 billion or more from year one. In order to buy USD 500 billion worth of goods over five years, India will have to bunch up big orders that are immediately in demand domestically. The obvious target in this respect would be to divert crude imports from Russia – which at peak were over USD 45 billion annually – almost entirely to the US. This has been Trump's persistent demand and was reiterated recently by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Diverting Russian oil purchases is the lowest-hanging fruit. One doesn't know how Russia will view this move by India. Though this is not mentioned in the joint framework statement, it is pretty much implied in the very nature of the one-sided deal the Modi government is making.

This deal does not even have reciprocity because America will charge an 18% import tariff on India's exports, and India will give low single-digit tariffs to the United States, almost matching what India has offered the European Union (EU). Trump claimed that India has offered zero tariffs, but the framework statement does not mention 'zero'. However, it has to be as good, if not better, than what India is offering the EU.

Also read: India-US Trade Deal: US Cuts Duty to 18%, India Slashes Tariffs on US Goods, Says Joint Statement

Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal claimed that India got a better deal than other Asian countries such as China, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, etc. The truth is India may have got 1 or 2 percentage points lower import tariff in the US, but the fact is, no East Asian economy has offered to dilute its trade surplus with the US like India has done. In fact, China, Vietnam and other countries have fortified their trade surpluses with the US in 2025. China has recorded a peak trade surplus of USD 1.2 trillion. Vietnam and others are also holding up well.

One really doesn't know what the Modi government's grand strategy is in deliberately eroding India's trade surplus with the US. If there is some hidden geopolitical strategy at play, it is far from clear.

Also, Piyush Goyal's assurance that India's agriculture sector is fully protected flies in the face of the confident assertion by the US that it will wipe out its agri trade deficit with India. The framework statement mentions many food and agriculture categories, but one can assume this is not an exhaustive list. The government needs to give a detailed account of how the new deal will impact agriculture.

There is also a passing mention of ironing out many disputes in digital trade. There is immense pressure from the US on India's digital sovereignty. The US has serious disagreements with India's data localization policy and wants Indian data to be freely stored and accessed by US big tech companies like Google and Amazon in their jurisdiction.

On Intellectual Property Rights, India has already diluted its compulsory licensing regime in favor of voluntary licensing in collaboration with foreign pharma companies in the India-EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA). This was also done in the FTA with the United Kingdom finalised last May. So the US will not accept anything less favourable than that. If anything, it will want even more. There are many such concerns regarding India's economic and trade sovereignty about which there is complete lack of transparency. These issues will need serious deliberation – as and when the Speaker of the Lok Sabha decides to invite PM Modi back to Parliament.

This article went live on February seventh, two thousand twenty six, at forty-seven minutes past four in the afternoon.

The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
 

Modis Deal With Trump: Submission Sold as High Strategy​

M.K. Venu7 Feb 2026
Even the erstwhile East India Company might have envied India's one-sided trade deal with the United States.

The framework for an interim agreement on bilateral trade jointly released by India and the United States (US) does something unprecedented in the history of free and fair trade among nations. How can a nation give an omnibus commitment to buy USD 500 billion worth of goods at the rate of USD 100 billion each year over the next five years? Has free trade ever been conducted in this manner?

This entirely one-sided commitment by India to the US is problematic on many levels. At present, India has about USD 130 billion of two-way trade with the US and enjoys a trade surplus of about USD 45 billion. India's exports to the US are about USD 85 billion, and imports are USD 40 billion. Trump has had a problem with India having a substantial trade surplus with America, and he attributes this to unfair tariff and non-tariff barriers imposed by India, which prevent the US from exporting enough to India. Trump's advisor Peter Navarro is particularly focused on non-tariff barriers, which help protect India's big business groups.


In any free or open trade arrangement, such barriers are reciprocally brought down. Once barriers are removed, the two sides are expected to compete on the basis of their competitiveness. This is how things normally happen. But India is doing something unprecedented by not only bringing down tariff and non-tariff barriers but also assuring Trump that India would buy, over the next five years, USD 500 billion worth of items in sectors such as energy, food and agriculture, aircraft as well as its components, precious metals, coking coal, etc.

In fact, by doing so, the Prime Minister Narendra Modi government may be effectively wiping out India's trade surplus of USD 45 billion and replacing it with a growing trade deficit with the US. Even the erstwhile British East India Company might have envied such a one-way deal.

No wonder the US Agriculture Secretary, Brooke Rollins, confidently posted on X 48 hours ago that India's offer to open up its agri sector will help America wipe out its trade deficit of USD 1.3 billion with India in the agriculture sector. The framework for an interim agreement gives enough indication that this is very much a possibility.


Also read: India-US Trade Deal: Five Takeaways From the White House Statements

Just imagine: at present, the annual trade between India and the US is about USD 130 billion. US exports are about USD 40 billion. As per the framework agreement, the US could up its exports from USD 40 billion to USD 100 billion or more from year one. In order to buy USD 500 billion worth of goods over five years, India will have to bunch up big orders that are immediately in demand domestically. The obvious target in this respect would be to divert crude imports from Russia – which at peak were over USD 45 billion annually – almost entirely to the US. This has been Trump's persistent demand and was reiterated recently by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Diverting Russian oil purchases is the lowest-hanging fruit. One doesn't know how Russia will view this move by India. Though this is not mentioned in the joint framework statement, it is pretty much implied in the very nature of the one-sided deal the Modi government is making.

This deal does not even have reciprocity because America will charge an 18% import tariff on India's exports, and India will give low single-digit tariffs to the United States, almost matching what India has offered the European Union (EU). Trump claimed that India has offered zero tariffs, but the framework statement does not mention 'zero'. However, it has to be as good, if not better, than what India is offering the EU.

Also read: India-US Trade Deal: US Cuts Duty to 18%, India Slashes Tariffs on US Goods, Says Joint Statement

Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal claimed that India got a better deal than other Asian countries such as China, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, etc. The truth is India may have got 1 or 2 percentage points lower import tariff in the US, but the fact is, no East Asian economy has offered to dilute its trade surplus with the US like India has done. In fact, China, Vietnam and other countries have fortified their trade surpluses with the US in 2025. China has recorded a peak trade surplus of USD 1.2 trillion. Vietnam and others are also holding up well.

One really doesn't know what the Modi government's grand strategy is in deliberately eroding India's trade surplus with the US. If there is some hidden geopolitical strategy at play, it is far from clear.

Also, Piyush Goyal's assurance that India's agriculture sector is fully protected flies in the face of the confident assertion by the US that it will wipe out its agri trade deficit with India. The framework statement mentions many food and agriculture categories, but one can assume this is not an exhaustive list. The government needs to give a detailed account of how the new deal will impact agriculture.

There is also a passing mention of ironing out many disputes in digital trade. There is immense pressure from the US on India's digital sovereignty. The US has serious disagreements with India's data localization policy and wants Indian data to be freely stored and accessed by US big tech companies like Google and Amazon in their jurisdiction.

On Intellectual Property Rights, India has already diluted its compulsory licensing regime in favor of voluntary licensing in collaboration with foreign pharma companies in the India-EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA). This was also done in the FTA with the United Kingdom finalised last May. So the US will not accept anything less favourable than that. If anything, it will want even more. There are many such concerns regarding India's economic and trade sovereignty about which there is complete lack of transparency. These issues will need serious deliberation – as and when the Speaker of the Lok Sabha decides to invite PM Modi back to Parliament.

This article went live on February seventh, two thousand twenty six, at forty-seven minutes past four in the afternoon.

The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Modi have sold sikh farmers to Trump. The sikh farmers shall begin new movement.

Its not Pakistan where you can ruin punjabi farmers with IMF reforms and get away with it. Sikhs are historically in victomhood state in India.
 
Modi have sold sikh farmers to Trump. The sikh farmers shall begin new movement.

Its not Pakistan where you can ruin punjabi farmers with IMF reforms and get away with it. Sikhs are historically in victomhood state in India.

Atleast you would hope so 😂
 
Modi have sold sikh farmers to Trump. The sikh farmers shall begin new movement.

Its not Pakistan where you can ruin punjabi farmers with IMF reforms and get away with it. Sikhs are historically in victomhood state in India.
Ram ram ji,

I humbly request you to do better research before you post. Sikh farmers are concentrated in Punjab, and the major crops grown in Punjab like wheat and rice are completely outside the purview of the trade agreement.
 
Honestly, I wish we had opened up properly instead of all this media wordplay on both sides. A real opening would help us integrate into global supply chains right now, but politically it’s almost suicide.

Funny how opening up the economy is seen as a bad thing, when it actually helps countries stop producing inefficient stuff and focus on their real strengths. Hopefully we’ll become more open over time.

Hoping your words come true soon

I agree, opening up is not a bad thing, but Modi put his flag on the hill of protecting Indian farmers and agri. They have been thrown under the bus
 
@hydrabadi_arab

Hydra bro,

Its not Pakistan where you can ruin punjabi farmers with IMF reforms and get away with it.

Not surprised to hear that. Pakistanis don't seem to be capable of reacting to any kind of injustice.

The sikh farmers shall begin new movement.

Let's hope that like their ancestor Maharaja Ranjit Singh they march towards Lahore and not Delhi.

Regards
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top