Indian false flag and current Indo-Pak stand-off updates

[Master Chief]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Did BBC invite anyone to actually put forward the Pakistani viewpoint, or just some "neutral" Indian to speak on our behalf?

BBC UK is overrun by India origin senior editorial staff, completely - our fault for letting it happen - one may suggest this is not relevant, but it has introduced bias into their reporting agenda. Even when reporting on Pakistani events, these UK based Indians are deployed to compile the reports. BBC will proudly claim this is an example of ethnic diversity, but of course, in truth, it is the facilitation of biased journalism.

This is without even mentioning the influence of their overseas Bureau in India, which commandeers reportage across the whole subcontinent.

The watering down and "explaining away" of anti-muslim disenfranchisement and massacres in India is quite disgusting frankly. Then there is the outright banning in India of anything critical of the nationalised political position - Modi is beyond objective critique, as demonstrated by the banning of a recent BBC documentary on him. The Indian government has carried out its usual "tax raids" to enforce compliance of the India Bureau.

In a global sense, BBC has become ineffective as and unwilling to even try to be an independent news source on subcontinental matters.

India: The Modi Question - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

BBC India offices searched by income tax officials

The searches come weeks after a documentary in the UK looked at PM Modi's role in 2002 riots.

www.bbc.co.uk

"Foreign funding for digital news companies based in India was capped at 26% under new regulatory requirements.

The change effectively means any company publishing digital news content in the country must be majority-owned by Indian nationals."

BBC announces restructure to India operations

A new, wholly Indian-owned company has been set up containing the BBC's six Indian language services.

www.bbc.co.uk

...and somehow we are told that Indian media is vibrant and free and a demonstration of the 1.2billion stronk democracy.

 

[Khansaheeb]

Border heating up:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Master Chief]

To my Pakistani friends, there is a fear that we will be engrossed in this tactical battle (Indians will strike or not) and lose sight of the bigger and strategic picture.

The same thing, unfortunately happened in 2019. Pakistan achieved tactical success and controlled the escalation ladder but we were oblivious to Indian’s strategic moves.

Coming to 2025, the Indian government was looking at this incident to make a strategic move, which was to suspend the IWT. The water terrorism has drawn no criticism by the world powers. Though the Indians have no storage capacity to hold Pakistan’s water yet, they will be in the position to block it in 5-10 years.

Unfortunately Pakistan’s diplomatic arm has completely lost sight of this topic nor there is any thought of taking this issue seriously on the world stage.

Bombing of dams and other useless comments won’t suffice, as that will lay the blame squarely on Pakistan.

There is an option Pakistan can take, that is to deny Indian commercial ships through its extended economic zone and in an extreme scenario even through its extended continental shelf.

Agree 100%.

India has already played its hand.

 

[r3alist]

Did BBC invite anyone to actually put forward the Pakistani viewpoint, or just some "neutral" Indian to speak on our behalf?

BBC UK is overrun by India origin senior editorial staff, completely - our fault for letting it happen - one may suggest this is not relevant, but it has introduced bias into their reporting agenda. Even when reporting on Pakistani events, these UK based Indians are deployed to compile the reports. BBC will proudly claim this is an example of ethnic diversity, but of course, in truth, it is the facilitation of biased journalism.

This is without even mentioning the influence of their overseas Bureau in India, which commandeers reportage across the whole subcontinent.

The watering down and "explaining away" of anti-muslim disenfranchisement and massacres in India is quite disgusting frankly. Then there is the outright banning in India of anything critical of the nationalised political position - Modi is beyond objective critique, as demonstrated by the banning of a recent BBC documentary on him. The Indian government has carried out its usual "tax raids" to enforce compliance of the India Bureau.

In a global sense, BBC has become ineffective as and unwilling to even try to be an independent news source on subcontinental matters.

India: The Modi Question - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

BBC India offices searched by income tax officials

The searches come weeks after a documentary in the UK looked at PM Modi's role in 2002 riots.

www.bbc.co.uk

"Foreign funding for digital news companies based in India was capped at 26% under new regulatory requirements.

The change effectively means any company publishing digital news content in the country must be majority-owned by Indian nationals."

BBC announces restructure to India operations

A new, wholly Indian-owned company has been set up containing the BBC's six Indian language services.

www.bbc.co.uk

...and somehow we are told that Indian media is vibrant and free and a demonstration of the 1.2billion stronk democracy.

These are valid concerns well explained but whether India is portrayed softer or Pak is not, is not in the control of senior brown BBC staff , these are bigger agendas

The tension to pay attention to is how much India thinks it can stick it to the western media at no cost versus how important India is seen by the west

See my previous post but India is playing a high offensive line, or playing aggressively first ball of innings and uses the heft of its nation to get shrill

the outrage and reaction over one BBC documentary on modi, that really not many people bothered for including me, is a great example of mobilising mass outrage

Honestly modi has a deep connection to the Indian psych, more than Imran khan in Pakistan, it's real


I have seen fairly inert UK Indians get behind Modi because he makes Indians look powerful and they really yearn that deep down... Just pretend not to care, they lose reason, if it's an irrational love you know they are enchanted

It's that very irrationality and unnatural tough guy talk that has to come to good or collapse

Enter Pakistan and china.....

 

[Maarkhoor]

Border heating up:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

After Indian aggression we beat them to run away and now every night they are trying to recapture their posts.

 

[Yasser76]

Had 4 Indians say action was imminent yesterday. Quiet today

 

[CombatCorner]

More tantrums from Delhi drama queens.
Cameras always present to show Indian aggressive attitude in the form of a dry dam.... meanwhile....

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[r3alist]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[hydrabadi_arab]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

How any of this prove Pakistan was behind pahalgam? like what stupid low IQ logic is that.

 

[Maarkhoor]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[CombatCorner]

Some sane Indians are seeing through the policies of Mad Modi .

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[maverick]

i think everyone has failed to understand one critical situation.

while everyone is focusing on river indus, the two other rivers Jehlum and Chenab have kishenganga and baligha dams on them. These two dams have the capability to stop and divert some of pakistani waters allowed under IWT to Pakistan, towards India.

Indias suspension of IWT has allowed india to stop water on Jehlum and Chenab river. The main purpose if suspension are these two rivers. Water terrorism has already started, India will focus on River indus to complete the stranglehold

Pakistan has to go to war sooner or later, the nation has to prepare for it now, mandatory draft of upto 3 Million Pakistanis should take place btw the age of 18 till 24.. and train them for war in 2 years.. Sorry you have no choice…

Strikes are just a distraction, Pakistanis need a visionary leader, a strong one who can prepare the nation for war. i can assure u current non elected leaders wont save pakistan. high time pakistan work on its survival now and fight for Kashmir liberation, so 240Million people are able to survive, and avoid civil war… Hindutva and zionist are the same unfortunately

 

[Sharma Ji]

Modi zi doing tapasya for 1000 page thread on PDF

 

[Oracle]

Alert: Arnab Goswami is active in this thread

Dont act like indian crackhead k jab sahi baat kare to Aage se shugal lagao.

Am in Islamabad currently

 

[Dalit]

Did BBC invite anyone to actually put forward the Pakistani viewpoint, or just some "neutral" Indian to speak on our behalf?

BBC UK is overrun by India origin senior editorial staff, completely - our fault for letting it happen - one may suggest this is not relevant, but it has introduced bias into their reporting agenda. Even when reporting on Pakistani events, these UK based Indians are deployed to compile the reports. BBC will proudly claim this is an example of ethnic diversity, but of course, in truth, it is the facilitation of biased journalism.

This is without even mentioning the influence of their overseas Bureau in India, which commandeers reportage across the whole subcontinent.

The watering down and "explaining away" of anti-muslim disenfranchisement and massacres in India is quite disgusting frankly. Then there is the outright banning in India of anything critical of the nationalised political position - Modi is beyond objective critique, as demonstrated by the banning of a recent BBC documentary on him. The Indian government has carried out its usual "tax raids" to enforce compliance of the India Bureau.

In a global sense, BBC has become ineffective as and unwilling to even try to be an independent news source on subcontinental matters.

India: The Modi Question - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

BBC India offices searched by income tax officials

The searches come weeks after a documentary in the UK looked at PM Modi's role in 2002 riots.

www.bbc.co.uk

"Foreign funding for digital news companies based in India was capped at 26% under new regulatory requirements.

The change effectively means any company publishing digital news content in the country must be majority-owned by Indian nationals."

BBC announces restructure to India operations

A new, wholly Indian-owned company has been set up containing the BBC's six Indian language services.

www.bbc.co.uk

...and somehow we are told that Indian media is vibrant and free and a demonstration of the 1.2billion stronk democracy.

Do you expect impartiality from the Brits?