Indian false flag and current Indo-Pak stand-off updates

[RescueRanger]

This peace-loving! Bhakt is looking for trouble. The best the Bhakts can do is paste our flags on the road.

Oh bhai border par aao an khushboo laga kae.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

I can never endorse insulting the flag of another nation, there is just no need for it. This is all the can do to vent their frustrations.

 

[Sharma Ji]

This peace-loving! Bhakt is looking for trouble. The best the Bhakts can do is paste our flags on the road.

Oh bhai border par aao an khushboo laga kae.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

that's disgusting

lolwtf

 

[r3alist]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[RescueRanger]

3 saying "bhai, tu rehnde"

1 got a case of the badhazmi, he want an alcaseltzer

Agar itni gas hain to Hajimola Kha ley... You once raised the point of biological weapons.

Is the biological weapon you elluded to India launching a massive FART attack against us after 2 weeks of constipation?

 

[Chandragupt Maurya]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

General Musharraf miscalculated the concept of nuclear deterrence during the 1999 Kargil War. Most Pakistanis believe that launching a nuclear weapon at India is straightforward, but that’s far from the truth. India’s Air Force, Navy, and ground forces are fully capable of preventing Pakistan from even preparing for a nuclear launch. While India’s air defense systems are designed to intercept missiles mid-air, it’s important to note that India can also target and destroy Pakistan’s nuclear installations on the ground.
Pakistan lacks nuclear submarines, which are essential for a credible deterrent. actual threat of a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan is zero.

Some Pakistanis claim that they have underground nuclear installations and they are safe even from a nuclear attack. Even if that were true, a nuclear missile must surface before launch—and it can be targeted and destroyed at that very moment.

 

[RescueRanger]

General Musharraf miscalculated the concept of nuclear deterrence during the 1999 Kargil War. Most Pakistanis believe that launching a nuclear weapon at India is straightforward, but that’s far from the truth. India’s Air Force, Navy, and ground forces are fully capable of preventing Pakistan from even preparing for a nuclear launch. While India’s air defense systems are designed to intercept missiles mid-air, it’s important to note that India can also target and destroy Pakistan’s nuclear installations on the ground.
Pakistan lacks nuclear submarines, which are essential for a credible deterrent. actual threat of a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan is zero.

Mush retire ho key chal bassa dunya sey. Instead of giving us a history lesson, live in the present please.

 

[Sparten]

Europe is busy with Ukraine
US with internal infighting, and houthis
They said do what you want and Trump got a call from MBS - he asked them to tackle it.
China is semi in on Pakistan -

And Goswamis shrill has not been accompanied by a good dossier which Pakistan’s below average ones have outshined for now.

You are missing two points. First, the "irrelevance" of Pakistan that Indians and self loathing Pakistanis love to sprout cuts both ways, Western powers have very little leverage anymore wrt Pakistan. At least here. And secondly, its Feb 2019, everyone knows we can hit back and hard.

 

[RescueRanger]

I'm normally on my good behavior, but you Sir are a dirty, disgusting Indian Hindu. I can almost smell you from my screen sitting in another continent. I wish the Mods perm ban you and your silly, foolish views. I'm utterly convinced you participated in gang-gRapes in the self-proclaim proud Rape capital of the World, India!

Yaar we have Hindus in Pakistan and some Indian Hindus have actually spoken out against GODIs march to oblivion. So please brother, dont insult all Hindus like this instead use the term Hindutva terrorists.

Just like they like to use the term "Islamists" respond in kind with similar tropes.

 

[Sharma Ji]

Agar itni gas hain to Hajimola Kha ley... You once raised the point of biological weapons.

Is the biological weapon you elluded to India launching a massive FART attack against us after 2 weeks of constipation?

Ok, serious comment.

The Pahalgam event, horrific and tragic as it was (hope you agree)

was/is just not enough to merit an military strike on Pak fauj proper.. threshold se bhot neechay wala event.

 

[Chandragupt Maurya]

Mush retire ho key chal bassa dunya sey. Instead of giving us a history lesson, live in the present please.

Musharraf repeatedly threatened nuclear retaliation, yet India continued bombing Pakistani positions with full impunity. Nawaz Sharif later revealed that around 4,000 Pakistani soldiers were martyred in the Kargil conflict. To this day, Pakistan Army continues to hide the true number of casualties from Kargil.

 

[RescueRanger]

Ok, serious comment.

The Pahalgam event, horrific and tragic as it was (hope you agree)

was/is just not enough to merit an military strike on Pak fauj proper.. threshold se bhot neechay wala event.

Jani,

Phir wohi baat, terrorism is terrorism. People were killed, it should be condemned and OUR government condemned it multiple times.

But your second part, that is where I take issue.

A) You have not proved Pakistan orchestrated this
B) you do not launch military attacks on the infrastructure of a neighbouring army because of an act committed by unknown actors. Because that is tantamount to declaring WAR!

Read part B..

The sensible approach is the invite independent bodies to conduct a fair and impartial investigation.

 

[RescueRanger]

Musharraf

Musharraf is DEAD. Welcome to 2025. A lot has changed since then.

 

[FOOLS_NIGHTMARE]

 

[Scorched_Earth]

General Musharraf miscalculated the concept of nuclear deterrence during the 1999 Kargil War. Most Pakistanis believe that launching a nuclear weapon at India is straightforward, but that’s far from the truth. India’s Air Force, Navy, and ground forces are fully capable of preventing Pakistan from even preparing for a nuclear launch. While India’s air defense systems are designed to intercept missiles mid-air, it’s important to note that India can also target and destroy Pakistan’s nuclear installations on the ground.
Pakistan lacks nuclear submarines, which are essential for a credible deterrent. actual threat of a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan is zero.

All Pakistani land-based nuclear missile systems are road mobile and the ground launched theatre nuclear forces are canisterized. The U.S. with all their satellite and ISR capabilities failed to locate and destroy several Iraqi mobile Scud launchers in the 1991 Gulf War. Pakistan is much bigger with an incredibly diverse geography.

As for nuclear submarines, Pakistan has a diversified and highly survivable nuclear force that is designed to survive a pre-emptive first strike and a massive Indian second strike. There will always be residual survivable capacity for inflicting unacceptable damage in "counter-massive retaliation". Gen Kidwai is on record of having stated Pakistan's will and ability for "counter-massive retaliation."

During the 1960s, the US was forced to rethink its massive retaliation strategy in favor of flexible response when it became clear to them that all Soviet nuclear forces could not be completed destroyed in a first strike, and the Soviets at that time did not have very many ICBMs or SSBNs--they were just getting started in closing the gap.

 

[Yasser76]

All Pakistani land-based nuclear missile systems are road mobile and the ground launched theatre nuclear forces are canisterized. The U.S. with all their satellite and ISR capabilities failed to locate and destroy several Iraqi mobile Scud launchers in the 1991 Gulf War. Pakistan is much bigger with an incredibly diverse geography.

As for nuclear submarines, Pakistan has a diversified and highly survivable nuclear force that is designed to survive a pre-emptive first strike and a massive Indian second strike. There will always be residual survivable capacity for inflicting unacceptable damage in "counter-massive retaliation". Gen Kidwai is on record of having stated Pakistan's will and ability for "counter-massive retaliation."

During the 1960s, the US was forced to rethink its massive retaliation strategy in favor of flexible response when it became clear to them that all Soviet nuclear forces could not be completed destroyed in a first strike, and the Soviets at that time did not have very many ICBMs or SSBNs--they were just getting started in closing the gap.

Don't feed the troll. He will drag you down to his level of ignorance and out dumb you.

Unsure why he is not banned yet